Noticed in one of the rugby papers that Andy Haigh has left Salford. Anyone know if a new conditioner has been appointed? Or any rumours who it may be?

Why make a generalised remark then suggesting 'the club' may have behaved amateurishly if it was a personal matter between two individuals? To me 'the club' constitutes more than two people and it comes across as unfair criticism to other people that work for or represent the club.

Ok, so now you are trying to spell out that the club is everyone including the fans, the players, the directors and even the guy who cleans the toilets. Whatever you class as 'the club', there is no way a disagreement between two important members of 'the coaching' team should have ended up with one of them leaving. In a results based industry, that is what I would class as amateurish.

I don't even know how true this all is, but you came on here trying to be a smart a$@e. How long do you want to keep this going?



I do like using these symbols, though, they are quite

Eddie would not go full time which is why Dean got the job. Dean was a nice bloke but not a good conditioner.

A good conditioner can make or break a season and make or break other peoples coaching careers. It is a crucial appointment and the right man is a must.

Karl wanted a more scientifically based training programme and that is the only reason Eddie left. People who think they fell out should have been at Eddies funeral where it's the closest I have ever seen Karl to tears. Karl loved Eddie to bits as did all the lads and Karl even admitted later that it was probably an error for him to leave.

I think everyone in league should read Wayne Bennetts comments about what makes a winning team (after all he'd know). He says it's the same now as in the early part of his career.

The ironic part being Dean was scientifically very weak.