Is this true
anyone else heard this

if it is i hope they can get them selves together and work they way back on stronger foundations.

Although i dont agree with RL in the capital, i think they have tried very hard in recent years to kick it off, obviously its not been enough to save the club by the looks of it if this is true, it is a sad day to see when any club is in dire, as its bad on the sport we love. imho

How can you be against RL in the capital?

What exactly is there to liquidate, they have no ground, no players...not exactly a lot of ingredients to chuck in the blender!

Just because its been a waste of time over there era in SL, low crowds, poor travelling support, poor team, just think how can they make money as it is run as a business aswell, fev halifax leigh oldham sheffield a few of these teams should get there chance at the big time again. imho.

Interesting that it happened at the same time the senior team were at the RFL meeting...

Therefore, I'd suggest it may not be true.

Heard from whom???

Linky!!

Has it been a waste of time in Fev, Fax, Oldham, Sheffield etc? They've all had low crowds, poor travelling support and a poor team in the top flight before.

Are you against RL in those areas?

As for running it as a business, there's only 2 or 3 clubs max can currently do that, and they're not from Humberside either.

And they dropped out because they werent good enough, thats the point

I am not saying they havent had low crowds etc.. but London have never kicked on i mean the club havent even said your in SL for 2014 it was our CEO that said you was before yours did, you havent had a regular home either your own or rented isnt a sustainable business to require assets along the way, your youth as churned out a few good stars but nothing to write home about, your players are jumping further then Greg Rutherford, so what does that say?? it is sad for the game, but in a sport that makes very little clubs like yours are milking the funds, if fev was in SL they would attract the stars as the other clubs are, its SL and salaries that attract RL players not towns or cities M62 corridor or RL hotbed towns, imho RFL have tried for to long kicking it off in the wrong areas, again imo.

They were relegated weren't they?
But anyway he said he doesn't "agree with RL in the capital", it's a strange choice of words. As is thinking it's been a waste of time there but not at other clubs.

You mean like Fev, Fax, Oldham, Sheffield etc have kicked on?

Has Adam Pearson said Hull will be in SL for 2014?
Hull FC don't own their own home and sod all assets too. Oh apart from the players of course, which means the auditors won't sign off their accounts.

Milking the funds? Unlike those successful, profit-making, thriving heartland clubs eh?

If Fev was in SL they would attract stars? Why?

Which wrong areas are we on about? London or the heartland clubs that have had over a century to have a go?

London have massive issues, mainly down to mismanagement, and a spell in the Championships looks inevitable, but I don't see why it's a "waste of time" or "milking funds" in London but not when it's a club up North.

By the way, I'm not a London fan.

His Spirit Guide.

Hardly in the best of health at present. The total debt will be nearer 14 million by now, all of it owing to David Hughes.....I'd call him a nutter, but apparently he is wealthy enough to be referred to as an eccentric


[urlhttp://companycheck.co.uk/company/05322378/LONDON-RUGBY-LEAGUE-LIMITED/financial-accounts#company-accounts-table[/url

That is one nasty looking graph

True and he may turn out to be correct but just posting the thread title and no supporting evidence is crass. Mind you it's a regular feature on here in the close season.

You are so funny pal, are you Peter Kay ?
cracking one liner that.

Jesus, do you know nothing.

In the season before superleague fev finished 11th in a league of 16 teams. they where dumped to make way for London and Paris, neither of whom where in the top flight.

Fev over spent trying to get SL and almost went bust after losing int he playoff final to Wakefield. Now redeveloping their OWN ground and are ready for SL, just need the chance. would attract the players and the fans.

2013 average attendance an highest attendance where both bigger than Londons this season

Hold on, hold on. According to the flat-cappers the RFL have pumped millions onto LondonRL. It's not showing there

I bet they have had more than the flat-cappers

12 of out 13 SL visitors to London each year have 400+ miles travel......ALL Fevs opponents this year had less than 50 miles.....of course they will average more than London.....

Billions and Billion mate...we're absolutely rolling in it

So are we to assume the OP started this rumour on the VT after reading a rumour on the centurion MB?

Cracking read either way......off season highlight the annual blame London thread. Surprised we haven't been blamed for Gareth Hocks brain fart

Quote ="gutterfax"Cracking read either way......off season highlight the annual blame London thread. Surprised we haven't been blamed for Gareth Hocks brain fart'" ah you haven't been to the site: www.garethhocksslondonsfault.co.uk then

Quote ="gutterfax"Cracking read either way......off season highlight the annual blame London thread. Surprised we haven't been blamed for Gareth Hocks brain fart'" ah you haven't been to the site: www.garethhocksslondonsfault.co.uk then