panda panda oooohh likkle panda

sorry pal im busy

whats your

panda

It's quite clearly a question mark.

oh great so what is your

mark

Clarity usually requires a degree of competent cognisance.

You're wasting your time

A question mark is a symbol used as punctuation, in order to show a written question. In my case, I was questioning what you were on about.




and i'm laughing at the irony of an earlier post of mine.

I know I am.



If I wasn't on the pc anyway, I'd have stopped replying by now.

i am fully aware thanks coddy

very good, you are not as thick as a panda,but you still have a very stupid name, you can blame your parents

What's a stupin name?

And I'm still waiting to see how O'Meley was somehow affecting this tackle!

You know, the other Hull KR fans are probably looking at this thread and thinking "what a to$$er this wilde-robin is, I wish he would shut up and stop making a fool of himself!"

whats a stupin pal ??

do i care what other peeps think?? get a life you moron

You're currently arguing with people you don't know on an internet forum.....

im not arguing !!

You tell me? I was asking you first...



You can edit your posts, but it doesn't stop them being quoted!

sorry panda



get a life, most hull fc fans would think you are a complete to$$er with your uneducated rugby comments.

Clearly, or else you wouldn't talk to anybody about anything.

who cares realy?? to$$er

no i will talk,but i dont give a f**k what any one thinks,

I can't believe how far this has blown up.

Its a nothing incident, whether or not Bailey meant to elbow him in the head 3 times is a different arguement. However put yourself in Radford's position, you tackle a supposed cheap shot merchant and all of a sudden feel an elbow in the back of your head three times. These guys ain't machines and are human and his reaction is normal to what most humans would do if they thought they were getting elbowed in the head. Radford gets sent off and that should just be the end of it, it was an incident on an RL pitch would got too heated it happens week in and week out.

I really don't understand why people are calling him a coward, Radford would have stood toe to toe with him no problem. What makes it even worse is these same people who call him a coward also cheer and see one of there players as hero. This hero attacked a defenceless man with a friend for no reason at all, now that is a coward.

All those who call Radford a coward will have no problem offering him a boxing match, because he's a coward they is no way he'd accept.

As posted on the FC board, the original decision given it was a grade A offence was utter bollox. The gravitas and articulate reasoning from The Rulester presented at the Red Hall appeal was all that was required to sort it out. Well done James, and good luck on Saturday to Radders. Assuming he's selected of course.

Can that be backed up at all?

well i can back up that you are a to$$er