I didn't say fill in the forms for them but to create a blueprint process rather than let everyone spend time learning what could have been documented before they needed to do it. THEN let the clubs follow the process using their knowledge of the players. For instance not every club knows the criminal past of their players as some players may have spent convictions that they 'forgot' about. Also it can take weeks/months to get the paperwork to prove that a conviction is, indeed, spent, as you may have to go to the courts to get it. As the criteria seems to include being charged, not just convicted, someone could work out the documentation that would be needed in such a case where the player was charged but no further action was taken,etc. One doesn't need the details of the players, nor have the insight of mystic meg to work this stuff out in advance and run a workshop with clubs, or just document and circulate to pass on the knowledge and to get feedback to improve the process.

P.S. I doubt that the clubs do know about these issues that create difficulties. A friend of mine is coach at a side that went to Canada and they didn't know, and from what he was told by coaches from other clubs, neither did the other clubs.

Oh sorry thought you had a problem with employing criminals, obviously only have a problem with clubs not being able to sort paperwork for the criminals they employ

I'm still working out how HKR can get branded as tinpot for not starting the process sooner, when the earliest they will have known their dates of travel was last Wednesday.

Simple. All the SL teams should have allowed for being in the Middle 8's and sorted out the paperwork pre-season!

Good suggestion, miles better than mine...

I was going to suggest sending talent scouts to the Toronto Masters to see if there were any disgruntled tennis managers

I'm sure that Wigan & Saints had it all sorted, pre-season!

Mind you, they most likely don't have any 'undesirables' on their books. Tell you what though, I bet Leeds hadn't thought of the possible need for visas, during pre-season!!



Incidentally, one of our (Leigh) players couldn't travel to Toronto, and it was most likely because of a 'personal' issue. You now have that player!

A specialist immigration consultant is at the disposal of all the clubs who have to travel to Canada who know far more about the process than The RFL ever will. And yet players are still struggling to get an eTA.

He's not one of the players that I've heard. Crooks travelled to Toronto, whilst Hall's a former Wolfpack player, so you would assume both of those will be OK. However stranger things have happened!

Crooks played for us at Toronto. Hall didn't.

Hall would have (almost certainly) had a work permit when he played for TWP which will have expired when he left the club. To get back into the country he will have to apply for an eTA and if he has to answer 'yes' to any of the questions on the application that could well complicate matters.

When Hall left Wolfpack and signed for Leigh, we heard that it was part of the agreement that he would not travel with Leigh to any future Toronto games. Now he's signed for Hull KR so we don't know if that condition still stands.

Yes it will.

The 'not travel to play for Leigh against TWP' part of the deal is now irrelevant. Whether he can get an eTA is very relevant.

Mr Tim Sheens (and the many years of top class experience he has) is clearly annoyed by the situation and thinks the RFL haven't really thought through all of the implications of a Canadian based team. He does not blame Toronto though.

Quote ="Gallanteer"Mr Tim Sheens (and the many years of top class experience he has) is clearly annoyed by the situation and thinks the RFL haven't really thought through all of the implications of a Canadian based team. He does not blame Toronto though.'" why just blame the rfl? aren't the majority of clubs in the league part to blame too? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/39019432

Quote ="Gallanteer"Mr Tim Sheens (and the many years of top class experience he has) is clearly annoyed by the situation and thinks the RFL haven't really thought through all of the implications of a Canadian based team. He does not blame Toronto though.'" why just blame the rfl? aren't the majority of clubs in the league part to blame too? https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/39019432

Maybe it wasn't part of the deal between Leigh and Toronto. Maybe he has reasons for not wanting to travel there, which are not visa-related?

The “agreement “ wasn’t not to play for Leigh it was not go to Toronto, it is still valid.

I doubt that would be enforceable - see Sam Barlow circa 2011

TRUE