And swine flu.

Damn you Brown.

Nathan Brown taught Paul Wellens to kick.

I'll go with this. Think it makes sense.

Interesting also though from the Saints fans moaning about JD on Wellens. Because Cunningham actually did the same thing in the play immediately following his incident with the punch. He too fended off with the forearm, to get an offload in, where they scored a try. not too many moans about that from Saints fans.

It must be very frustrating for him now that referees are allowing defenders enough time to clear the ruck. Having made a very successful career out of exploiting weak/unset defences to suddenly now have to use skill to break down defences must be hugely frustrating.

However that isn't Stosic's fault.

Is Stosic in ITU yet?

Cunningham hasn't played like that for years.

Had you said Roby . . . .

If I were a giants fan I'd want the "tub 'o lard" available for the semi

Here is my question.

You are stranded on a desert island with Keiron Cunningham.

How long is it before you start fearing for your life when his gigantic need to fill his morbidly obese stomach starts to rumble?

I think this is a man that would kill another man to eat him.


I'm just putting it out there man.

It was very disappointing to see a cheap shot from KC. I'll put it down as a moment of madness but fully expect him to get 2/3 matches, i'd prefer 2 obvilously with the semi, but he deserves his punishment whatever it might be

At first sight, If it was you then it would be a real contest. I've seen you blubbering around the pool table on Youtube. Keiron's stickier than a stick insect compared to you.

But you're right - if it's a question of survival, Keiron would win hands down. He'd slam dunk your sorry ass at the first hand off. I'm not sure he'd eat you though. He'd have to scoop out all the crap you spew out on here on a dailiy basis and eating your brain would be like eating a plate of haute cuisine - looks pretty but there aint much of it there.

Even the first assertion may be dubious, if the rest of your post is reliable.

No charge


Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution




I find our disciplinary system funny.

Is that actually the verdict?
Shocking if so..

Yes indeed. www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1238

Yes indeed. www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... hp?id=1238

Absolute cack !!!!!
If burger king had of accidently hit him and stosic subsequently got a black eye, no one would bat an eye lid



But this has resulted in our prop suffering a broken cheekbone fractured eye socket (iirc) so the force ommited from KC must have been alot and sufficent to cause such injuries. And therefore burger kings actions werent accidental.

What a load of bull, dosent bother wakefield as a team we dont play st's again anytime soon, and st's play some of our rivals for top6 and of course is now on hand to beat huddersfield.

But its the disciplinary procedure as a whole in the NRL KC would have never got away with this, and maybe small club syndrome coming out here but if tevita leo-latu had done it, im sure he wouldnt have got off with a caution.

Another decision the RFL got wrong.

There's going to be a lynching!
more seriously though, has t'other fella's injury been confirmed?

Not from the club as it takes them weeks to get anything on website, but a few people from our forum are related to our players and they have come out with this news, so id take it as certain.

NOT GUILTY

Player intentionally has a jab at the Wakefield player and as such is guilty of misconduct; however the Panel are giving him the benefit of the doubt that contact with the eye is accidental and as such consider that it is appropriate to deal with this matter by way of a caution

In other words, he accidentally threw a punch on purpose.

Simples!

How does an intentional jab result in accidental contact.



Abit of a contradiction, dont we think ?

He meant to hit out, he didn't mean to hit his eye.

I don't see any contradiction there at all.

So which part of Stosic’s face did he mean to hit?

Everything except his eye