Whether a challenge is hard or soft is not the basis for whether it is legal or illegal. You and the Sky commentators should bear that in mind.

For example Stevo in commentary seemed to react to another challenge by Poore on Ellis where it was a good hard shot but perfectly legal imo, but of course Stevo was shouting for a penalty and bleating how the referee missed it.

There are too many soft penalties given in UK games as it is at the moment but there seems to be more and more dissection of petty incidents looking for reasons to penalise folk, especially on this forum.

so when aiton isn't their next time and he breaks a players neck what will be the excuse to justify it????

give over sill person - RFL no charge

Unless you've perfected that flux capacitor and fitted it to a DeLorean, I fail to see how the disciplinary panel can penalise for offences that haven't yet happened; he was warned to his future conduct - with the current technology available to us, I'm reasonably sure that's as far as they can go.

The point is to make a correct decision with the benefit of hindsight. Job done, anyone who understands the game will tell you it was nothing more than a messy slam tackle - common sense prevails.

You mate want it all ways.

Shocking tackle, lifted players legs over the horizontal, only his team mate prevented serious injury. Shocking decision by the disciplinary panel.

I bet the wakey fans wouldn't be so defensive if it was a hull player doing the same to one of their players!

it was a dangerous tackle, should've carried atleast a 1 game ban!

To be honest I’d expected a match, maybe a couple due to previous indiscretions, clumsy yes, malicious no. Lauitiiti copped a worse one last week but I didn’t see Agar bleating to the press about it & there wasn’t a six page thread about it on the V.T.

So again, just like the Poore incident with Farrell where Poore was kneed in head and then retaliated.
Bearing in mind how much time you spend on here analyzing stuff, you still are clueless aren't you?

That's nice, I'm not sure what that has to do with, but its nice of you to bring it up?

You find me anywhere in that disciplinary report which says that Farrell punched Poore, which is what Vasty asserted. Crack on.

There are plenty of videos of 'said' incident on a certain website which clearly shows Farrell punch Poore first if you care to look?
Crack on.

Poore

Ultimate chomper 2013

Edited for accuracy.

You cant possibly know that.

Way too many different scenarios that [ucould[/u have occurred had Aiton not been there.
I would say there would be a strong possibilty that had Aiton not been there,Poore wouldnt have even gone for the legs and there would have been no dangerous tackle.

Rich coming from you. Really.

You have me confused with Vastman

Nah. Vastman isn't a ginger turd disliked by most of his fellow supporters.

Ha ha, the gang gathers quickly doesn't it............

Like deliverance

Bless, your that significant I don't even know who you are

Indeed. Being insignificant to you is the only way to be.

Keep them coming! You'll be asking for one of your players to be up for Man Of Steel next

If it'd have happened the other way I'd have expected a penalty at most. Only if he had been dropped on his head would I have expected a more serious outcome.

No it wasn't hence the verdict - why exactly would the RFL show Poore or Waker any favours - never happened before.

Don't bother you're dealing with Smokies less able brother so you can only imagine just how simple he actually is. Prepare yourself for a series of predictable mind games where it the end he will unilaterally claim he owns you or some such nonsense - all very sad.