Yes it would be: the most common statement on here regarding Salford (apart from the lie we do not develop young players) is that we have very few fans. It follows we have a small population from which the persons with sufficient wealth would appear.
(Cue comments telling supporters to put in a £1000 each; as usual we're generous with other people's money.)

There's a very good discussion on fan funded clubs here:
www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... 960&page=3

If the good Doctor walks, or if any businessman walks, that club is probably toast.

Yes it would be: the most common statement on here regarding Salford (apart from the lie we do not develop young players) is that we have very few fans. It follows we have a small population from which the persons with sufficient wealth would appear.
(Cue comments telling supporters to put in a £1000 each; as usual we're generous with other people's money.)

There's a very good discussion on fan funded clubs here:
www.totalrl.com/forums/index.php ... 960&page=3

If the good Doctor walks, or if any businessman walks, that club is probably toast.

I think you are right.

If the other solutions were so easy to achieve, surely Mr Koukash would never have been needed a few years ago.
Of course, everything is easier in hindsight but, Salfords situation would have been better served had Dr K embraced the sport, instead of
being so abrasive from the start.
I know that when Trinity visited the new ground for the first time, not long after he had taken over, there was a good buzz about the place and lots of families with kids were at the game with a decent crowd (around 7000) and Salford won.

Something changed within a couple of months and you crowds dropped back to 3500ish.
Was this down to the accesibility of the ground or drop in form ?

The work done up to that point had been excellent.

Also, how do Sale cope with the access issues and are their crowds much better and if so, why ?

I think you are right.

If the other solutions were so easy to achieve, surely Mr Koukash would never have been needed a few years ago.
Of course, everything is easier in hindsight but, Salfords situation would have been better served had Dr K embraced the sport, instead of
being so abrasive from the start.
I know that when Trinity visited the new ground for the first time, not long after he had taken over, there was a good buzz about the place and lots of families with kids were at the game with a decent crowd (around 7000) and Salford won.

Something changed within a couple of months and you crowds dropped back to 3500ish.
Was this down to the accesibility of the ground or drop in form ?

The work done up to that point had been excellent.

Also, how do Sale cope with the access issues and are their crowds much better and if so, why ?