This is what you posted halfway down this thread, hence me asking whether you thought stains were average as well as they only managed to beat Wakey in the last minute.

You really are a classic muppet as108.

=#FF0000Please refrain from name calling, and especially the use of that type of insult. Thank you. Karen

I have to say Wakefield look a pretty good side to me. Certainly greater than the sum of their parts.

Individually not too many would get into the so called big clubs but as a team they look pretty good.

I can see them putting in a very strong challenge for the playoffs.

to forget what he posted earlier is comical

You just said that Wakefield and Leeds are average sides earlier on in the thread. So if stains only managed to beat them recently in the last minute, it should tell you that stains are around the same level ie. the game was close. Please don't let me have to explain this again- you're making even more of a fool of yourself than normal.

Except I didn’t, I remember calling Wakefield average perfectly fine. They are. The lack of intelligence amongst some people is incredible.

And typical.

it is sweetheart

Keep digging

You really aren’t the smartest are you? Using your quite bizarre logic, Hull FC are a better side than Wigan and London are better than Wakefield. A game being close does not necessarily mean the two teams are on the same level. The table is a better measure of who’s better than who. Already after 4 games in, we are 4 points ahead of Wakefield and 6 ahead of Leeds with a game in hand. Similar to what I said before though, you don’t have the brain cells required to understand this as demonstrated in your previous posts on this thread.

Wakefield were good value for that win. A fast back line, a big forward pack and crafty set of halves.

Leeds were terrible. Poor structure in defence, and lazy defending the goal line.

It was that boring you felt the need to read it all and then respond to it. Brilliant.

You can't read anything into the table this early as each team has faced different opposition. The only time you can really use the table as a gauge is when everyone has played each other. Therefore, the only real comparisons that can be made at this moment in time, are those where two teams have faced each other.

You can attempt to insult me all you like; it still won't disguise the regular embarrassment you make of yourself on this forum AS108.

London are better than Wakefield then, do you agree or not?

You've posted eleven times on this particular thread, there's no substance to any of your posts' just bitterness and insults towards the 2 teams in question and the posters trying to discuss the game, are you competing with ruuBron to see who can be the biggest bore as well as being the biggest =#FF0000Please refrain from name calling. Thank you. Karen on here, or you two could simply go on your own board and bore each other to death, it's easy to see why it's dead on there

At that point, first game of the season yes. Certain teams are expected to do better as the season progresses though. After your narrow win against Leeds only last week, what makes you think they are average? Bearing in mind your narrow home win; what makes you think that Wakey are average after they convincingly beat Leeds at Headingly?

Well played Wakey, disappointed they put the cue on the rack with ten to go & Leeds down to 12, a top side would have put them to the sword but still well done to the Trin.

Leeds have spent their money in the wrong positions!

ASS108 hijacks another thread shock!

On another note, disrespectful question by Bill Arthur shot down in great fashion by Tom Johnstone.

The question wasn’t who was better at that point, the question was are London a better team than Wakefield because they beat them?. London were better on the day and Wakefield had an off day. Using your completely flawed logic, London are a better team than Wakefield end of. Except that isn’t true is it and your first sentence basically admits that. I’m struggling to see what it is that’s so hard for you to grasp. Teams play at different levels each week, clearly Leeds played better last week than today. Using a one off game to try and compare the level of teams is plain stupid as shown by the London va Wakefield game.

Again, if it’s that boring then scroll past and ignore. However, you’re still here reading, replying to my posts and looking to see how many times I’ve posted on a thread. Also, I think you’ll find Gazwire was the one asking questions that were completely irrelevant to both Leeds and Wakefield so I responded. If you don’t like that then tough.

There are exceptions to the rule, and yes, Wakey look stronger on paper than London. When Leicester won the Premier League title, they were labelled average throughout the season and it turned out they weren't- the table proves it- so my point is: only a fool would bluntly announce two descent looking sides to be average this early on in the season- especially when stains barely managed to beat them in recent games.

Wakey certainly look the more likely of the two to trouble the big clubs (and Warrington) this season.

They dismantled Leeds with ease who'll be lucky to finish mid-table. No doubt soon their fans will be calling for the return of McDermott after wanting him out from pretty much the day he got the gig.

Hope the Wakefield fans can now take a week off from their usual bleating about referees as their side were outstanding tonight and the scoreline flattered Leeds.

You’re saying there are exceptions to the rule because you know Wakey will finish above London by a pretty big distance, so for you to say otherwise would make you look like a fool. Saints are likely to finish above Wakey and Leeds by big distances so why aren’t the Saints vs Leeds and Saints vs Wakey games exceptions to the rule which doesn’t exist as well? That hasn’t been your point at all. Your point is that Saints must be an average side because I called Leeds and Wakefield average and Saints only just beat those sides which is a completely ridiculous point as I’ve just proved with the London vs Wakefield game. Also Leicester have absolutely zero relevance to what you’re trying to say.

F*** me just put a cork in it.