Its all just a bit of fun, glad it is making you laugh!

Wigan
Catalans
St Helens
Castleford
Warrington
Leeds
Huddersfield
Hull FC
Hull KR
Widnes
Wakefield
Salford

Leeds
Wigan
Saints
Cas
Warrington
Hudds
Catalans
HKR
Hull
Widnes
Wakey
Salford

Wigan
Huddersfield
Leeds
St Helens
Warrington
Catalans
Castleford
Hull
Hull kr
Widnes
Wakefield
Salford

Wigan
Huddersfield
Leeds
Warrington
Saints
Catalans
Castleford
Hull FC
Widnes
Hull KR
Wakefield
Salford

For the first time in Radfords reign I am confident that Hull will do something. A trophy is probably out of reach, but it should be a much improved year. And if it isn't then it probably spells the end for Radford. So its win win.

Wigan
Saints
Leeds
Hull
Warrington
Huddersfield
Catalans
Castleford
Hull KR
Salford
Widnes
Wakefield

That Radford is still in charge is the reason why I placed Hull outside the Top 8. Hull always seem to try add a few good recruits every year and spend money on them but go for the cheap option in the coaching staff. Doesn't strike me as a coach who'll get them pushing for top 4.....at best squeezing into the top 8.

*likewise for Catalans. As good as Todd Carney is I don't think the Catalans coach is good enough to get them into the top 4.

We might have imported some great players in from the NRL and are developing our youngsters really effectively but it will take a couple more years for our youngsters to reach their full potential so I would give Hull a little improvement and two massive crossed fingers at actually doing something in the players but ultimately we will fall just short again. Every year I say that Warrington are finally going to win the league but I am not saying it again... I don't think, although they will be round about there.

Wigan
St Helens
Warrington
Leeds
Castleford
Hull
Huddersfield
Catalans
HKR
Salford
Wakefield
Widnes

I don't see the top 8 teams changing this year, I don't think any team that finished outside the 8 have recruited well enough to remove one of the teams that finished 8th. I just hope Hull can get 2/3 more wins than last year and at least have a chance of finishing in the top 4 after the changes.

Wigan, Leeds and Saints will be top 3, with Warrington, Hull, Catalans, Hudds and Cas fighting for the 4th spot.

Wigan
Leeds
Saints
Warrington
Huddersfield
Catalans
Castleford
Hull KR
Hull FC
Wakefield
Salford
Widnes

CC- Saints
GF- Leeds

Wigan
Leeds
Warrington
Catalans
Saints
Castleford
Hudds
Hull FC
Hull KR
Salford
Wakefield
Widnes

Anybody
Wigan

Finished 7th before the split last season, pack has improved this season, I'd be happy if we get 4th to 6th


We had close results last season being on the wrong side of them, 3 more wins would have seen us top 4, losses teams in the bottom 4 didn't help either

Agreed. Same goes for people writing Cas off.

I'd be happy to take bets on Hull finishing above either the Giants or Cas.

Warrington, Catalans, and Hull. What do those three have in common, eh?

Leigh
Bradford
Halifax
Sheffield
London
Dewsbury
Featherstone
Batley
Workington
Whitehaven
Oldham
Swinton


Middle 8s - Hammering, Hammering, Curious victory for championship team, Hammering, Hammering....

Million Pound game Wakefield 32 - Leigh 16

Another great post.

just look at his username, explains all



dont see much in rovers signings to say they will improve on last season

3 of your wins were also by 4 or less points so that logic can go both ways.

Yeah I see what you meen like if we had won an extra 10 games we would have won the LLS

Almost as good as yours. Top 4 my ar$e

I don't know what do those three have in common?

1. St Helens
2. Wigan
3. Leeds
4. Warrington
5. Huddersfield
6. Catalans
7. Castleford
8. Hull FC
9. Hull KR
10. Salford
11. Widnes
12. Wakefield

Probably won't be far off, though Cas could finish in top four. in 2016 Warrington are effectively 'starting again' as the all-Brit halfback policy they tried after Briers' s retirement did not work. If the new structure clicks early they could do well, but a lot of new players to bed in at once may lead to disappointment.

But we won those games so it doesn't really. The games ww list v cas away for instance we should have won but we had a winger who couldn't or would defend

So, the close games you lost could have gone the other way but, the close games as you won couldn't?
Fantastic dullard logic on show there.

Look at this for instance.

At BV Wakey beat you by small margin. You say that could've gone the other way.

At the KC you beat us by a small margin. But you say that can't have gone the other way.