[quote="FIL":17xd76a2]There was a mini excavator parked in the South East corner today so it looks like they are on with that too [/quote:17xd76a2] Good news. A few hundred extra fans in the south will only add to the atmosphere.

[quote="Trojan Horse":3cgzgq0j]Good news. A few hundred extra fans in the south will only add to the atmosphere.[/quote:3cgzgq0j] It’s 500 apparently.

[quote="vastman":23l4dj91]It’s 500 apparently.[/quote:23l4dj91] Nice boost that. Can’t see that we willl need more capacity for a few years.

[quote="Trojan Horse":3rcmtyu1]Nice boost that. Can’t see that we willl need more capacity for a few years.[/quote:3rcmtyu1] It is good to see, and probably won't. However, I wouldn't be surprised, further dowm the line, to see something more permanent there, to incorporate a stand or terrace, mixed in with offices/hospitality. Like thats being previously mentioned, the Benidorm flats were meant to be a temporary measure That though costs time and more importantly money.

[quote="Eastern Wildcat":2k22ld99]It is good to see, and probably won't. However, I wouldn't be surprised, further dowm the line, to see something more permanent there, to incorporate a stand or terrace, mixed in with offices/hospitality. Like thats being previously mentioned, the Benidorm flats were meant to be a temporary measure That though costs time and more importantly money.[/quote:2k22ld99] Once the west is done and the south east, club shop/cafe it’s going to be a nice tidy stadium. A base we can truly build from.

[quote="Eastern Wildcat":24llgc94]It is good to see, and probably won't. However, I wouldn't be surprised, further dowm the line, to see something more permanent there, to incorporate a stand or terrace, mixed in with offices/hospitality. Like thats being previously mentioned, the Benidorm flats were meant to be a temporary measure That though costs time and more importantly money.[/quote:24llgc94] They may have started that way but the flats are pretty permanent now. He wouldn't be adding a lift and refurbing it if he had plans to remove it.

the East stand hospitality is going to look awesome when refaced after that over charged botch job morgan Sindall did.

[quote="God":33c3jhtb]the East stand hospitality is going to look awesome when refaced after that over charged botch job morgan Sindall did.[/quote:33c3jhtb] Does God know something the rest of us don’t. I have not heard anything regarding work on East Stand hospitality.

The work has started in corner already the plans look amazing chandeliers panelled walls etc, havent any of you took a trip to the biggest kitchen showroom in the uk (South Kirkby) to see what design flare the Ellis family has you owe it to them to buy a kithchen they would have never done a hospitality suite out like a council office. Even if you u saw their various office premises they are so good.

[quote="God":3scbz3dn]The work has started in corner already the plans look amazing chandeliers panelled walls etc, havent any of you took a trip to the biggest kitchen showroom in the uk (South Kirkby) to see what design flare the Ellis family has you owe it to them to buy a kithchen they would have never done a hospitality suite out like a council office. Even if you u saw their various office premises they are so good.[/quote:3scbz3dn] Wow, sounds like the family are really going for it. Really can't wait to see how the whole stadium pans out over the coming years

Noticed at yesterday's game that we've dug ip a squar in the middle of the car park. Not sure what it's for.

[quote="wakeytrin":3brypd8r]Noticed at yesterday's game that we've dug ip a squar in the middle of the car park. Not sure what it's for.[/quote:3brypd8r] Wish I’d known I would have walked out that way with the wife

[quote="Big lads mate":2h319a09]Wish I’d known I would have walked out that way with the wife [/quote:2h319a09] Why? Did you intend to jump in and give your good lady a laugh , only kidding, I know you think the world of her.

[quote="Dunkirk Spirit":2bzhxrbr]Why? Did you intend to jump in and give your good lady a laugh , only kidding, I know you think the world of her.[/quote:2bzhxrbr] You know me too well DS

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sean-smi ... er_android

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sean-smi ... er_android

[quote="Big lads mate":2fq5lmq2]Wish I’d known I would have walked out that way with the wife [/quote:2fq5lmq2] Well, if it's owt like your passing, you'd have missed it.....

[quote="BarnsleyGull":c5xeb763]Well, it it's owt like your passing, you'd have missed it.....[/quote:c5xeb763] Always remember BG form is temporary class is permanent

[quote="Khlav Kalash":364pa8a5]https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sean-smith-zs-surveys_sports-construction-engineering-activity-7294432871170080768-QIgM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_android[/quote:364pa8a5] Love the comment that job has grown arms and legs, having attended some supporter sessions and listening to Matt there is no surprises there!

Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed. [url=https://ibb.co/LXj4PdP2:3d7z8zgo][img:3d7z8zgo]https://i.ibb.co/jP075k51/Snip-Image.jpg[/img:3d7z8zgo][/url:3d7z8zgo]

[quote="Khlav Kalash":1e2mkeb2]Revision to the gantry position. Less imposing on the houses behind, steeper incline of the roof. Also the roof of the original section is proposed to be redone. Still not sure how permanent this solution is but I guess with the objections it may be harder to get anything other than this passed. [url=https://ibb.co/LXj4PdP2:1e2mkeb2][img:1e2mkeb2]https://i.ibb.co/jP075k51/Snip-Image.jpg[/img:1e2mkeb2][/url:1e2mkeb2][/quote:1e2mkeb2] As I pointed out with the previous plans, it was impossible for the gantry to be accommodated in that design. This is a far neater solution and will look better also.

Although not shown, I wonder if a reprofile of the existing terracing is on the cards ala the NS.

[quote="Khlav Kalash":3imnh9a1]Although not shown, I wonder if a reprofile of the existing terracing is on the cards ala the NS.[/quote:3imnh9a1] It doesn’t look that way. Think I mentioned it when the plans went up there looks to be nothing to suggest that the bottom area will be raised or the terrace reprofiled. Seems like these adaptations to original gantry will cut down some space in the office/gantry area. I do like the idea of a raised roof angle though.

[quote="Trojan Horse":1qo5yrse]It doesn’t look that way. Think I mentioned it when the plans went up there looks to be nothing to suggest that the bottom area will be raised or the terrace reprofiled. Seems like these adaptations to original gantry will cut down some space in the office/gantry area. I do like the idea of a raised roof angle though.[/quote:1qo5yrse] No plans showed the north stand re-profile either. As I said it'll depends how permanent this arrangement is. If it's for 10 years or so then it's worth looking at, if there are bigger plans in the offing then it's not.

[quote="Khlav Kalash":15ieyvjz]No plans showed the north stand re-profile either. As I said it'll depends how permanent this arrangement is. If it's for 10 years or so then it's worth looking at, if there are bigger plans in the offing then it's not.[/quote:15ieyvjz] I was sure that in the documents it mentioned new terracing and new barriers in the north and in the drawings they were referenced for the north development. Out of excitement I had a real good nosey at them. I haven’t read the documents thoroughly on the west and only scanned the drawings so I may have a read later of all documents to see if there is anything at all.

[quote="Trojan Horse":2sdpy2gu]I was sure that in the documents it mentioned new terracing and new barriers in the north and in the drawings they were referenced for the north development. Out of excitement I had a real good nosey at them. I haven’t read the documents thoroughly on the west and only scanned the drawings so I may have a read later of all documents to see if there is anything at all.[/quote:2sdpy2gu] Apologies I meant formally submitted planning drawings. Of course there are working drawings which did show it.