Oh dear, your obsession gets worse.

Even some of the Hudds fans on your forum are sick of you.

Are they. Oh dear. I feel their pain.

Sadly you still have the 'compulsion' to write about me. Do try and stick to the topic....the finances of wakey. Or open a seperate thread?

Don’t get into these personal insults, don’t see the need tbf. But you have avoided some post made I wonder why.!?

Bibb and Rooney are no loss what so ever.

Petersen has not exactly been brilliant since he has got here but seems to be picking up but overall again would not be much of a loss

Would like us to keep Winto but if it means we will develop a younger player from within our ranks then sound. He has not exactly had the game time and is now out for the season

We have players signed up so it puts the money issue to bed

Because you do not know what you are 'talking about'.

I cannot see the posts were you challenge wakey fans for resorting to insults - hopeyou are not a hypocrite



Clubs do not release several players at the business end of the season unless there is a problem.

Signing players for next year does not show that you are good or bad financially. there is a bit more to it.

Care to enlighten us who have been released?

Winterstein has a broken jaw hasn't he? How's that down to cashflow MG?

Come on fella's don't baffle her with facts!

As far as I'm aware the only player who has definitely left is Pitts. A promising young player and a blow to lose, but what can you do when the club states they want to keep him and offer him a new improved contract, but he decides he wants to join Leeds?

Winterstein is injured until the end of the season and some reports have guessed he may have played his last game for the club.

Bibb and Rooney were both well down the pecking order and have gone out on loan to play first team rugby.

Sculthorpe has joined Huddersfield on loan while Korkidas has come the other way.

Petersen is still playing in the first team.

Those are the facts as far as I'm aware and in no way whatsoever points to any financial problems. Our recent on the field form would suggest that we aren't missing any of the players who have gone out on loan..

I know what I am talking about



And I am talking about other posters you have not replied to.


No hypocrite, just don't see the need to challenge them and make it worse.


Grtting rid of players we don't need makes great sense but of course you can't see that.

We don't need Rooney, Biib or Pitts. Let Pitts go now for money or he would leave for free come end of season. Now I know what every club would chose been in that situation

That is when she starts repeating her self over and over

Exactly. She's obsessed and making up 'facts'

Daft mare

Not wanting to pour petrol on the flames BUT Marsden Giant has been right about one thing which was Liam Fulton would have more of an impact than Winterstein did..

I thought it would be better to mention it on here rather than either of our boards for obvious reasons.

Crikey, that was one hell of a prediction. Who would have thought that a seasoned NRL pro who has won a GF would make more of an impact than an unknown trialist.....

Mystic Meg better watch her back.

Nowt to do with me but it kept MG and the Wakey fans going for about 12 pages. This discussion had become a bit boring, just trying to give them something else to get their teeth into

yeah the crystal ball of fartown!
heard there getting a new hooker for the next season,
shes just waiting to find out which end of street shes working.

and to real constructive supportive hudds fans thanks! .. genuine!

When several players exit and they are not replaced. Most likely reason...finances.

It is hypocritical.

With several players out you have money available. A club who want to do well in the play offs would look to strengthen - unless they think themselves perfect

. wakey are not taking such an opportunity.

All these 'low grade' players you will not miss. Who signed them in the first place? Who's been paying their wages all season?

Exactly. Obvious isn't it.

Yet if you go through the Winterstein threads you will see many wakey fans wetting themselves over Winterstein and others bagging Fulton or claiming parity. They were clueless. few would have the guts to admit it.

No it's not but if I started with the insults it would be.

Pitts came through academy and made a good impression last season he is the only one out of the 3 that I would have liked to have kept. Like anyone he wanted to play at the club he supported as a kid.

Bibb is lazy offers nothing what so ever so get rid this does not weaken the team at all IMO.

Rooney let him go and get him self in the shop window for a contract at another club for next season.

It all makes sense if your not MG

maybe , maybe not .. Korki as made more impact in a month than scully did in a year.

different players will give you different results depending on club and coach , thornman is a true example of this.

BTW MG may be right but 1/1000 is a poor return.

Nice avatar BTW

edited (free of charge)

Please wash your hands after playing with it, i've heard Eagle flu is very serious and leaves a bitter taste in the mouth.

I suppose some people look at crowds down, shareholder schemes and several players being removed hastily from the pay roll etc and see a financially healthy club that can easily thrive and raise capital for a new stadium. I do not.

It would appear that stating this point gets up the noses of some wakey fans so much that all they can do is resort to childish insults (grist to my mill). ho hum.



let's see how things pan out.

You really don't have a clue do you.



Only thing you are right about is the attendances been down, but there is nothing us on here can do about that apart from attend the games which the majority of us do

Didn't they start the season with a few injuries and thus bring players in to cover for the start of the season?

Thus when these injuries clear up they would reduce the playing quota back down to their normal level.

It's that also a theory?

It is, but not one that suits Mardys obsession with Wakefield's (supposed) demise.