|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Pepe"The link you provided:
[urlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/super_league/4556801.stm[/url
The RFL, and Richard Lewis in particular, are clearly announcing that licencing will be going ahead in 2009, when the current (at that time, 2005) television deal with BSkyB expires at the end of 2008. This isn’t suggesting that they are merely considering moving to a licence system, but they’re announcing this plan as a fait accompli. The plan had been discussed with all the clubs and the go-ahead given, with definite time-lines, leading to it happening in 2009 and after the licence process being gone through in 2008.
There is no mention of uncertainly about a deal being reached with BSkyB for this and, as such, this would suggest that some sort of agreement had been made with them already.
The article even mentions that a club, in based Bridgend, will be considered. They hadn’t even played a game by then!
After reading that article, it is far from being paranoid to suggest the whole process and outcome was decided in 2005, if not before.'" Im not disputing they had decided to move to a licensing system. In fact that is what that press release is about. What I am disputing is your clearly paranoid assumption that they had decided how many and which clubs at this point in 2005. They hadnt, that didnt happen until a) negotiations had been completed with sky so that they could decide how many in 2008, and B) the bids had been sumbitted and judged so they could decided who,
Quote I believe that we can dramatically increase the number and quality of players coming through the system from the Widnes area. Given that the Club is now also developing young players across all the schools in the entire borough of halton, and developing links on across our boarders to the South and West, where there is no competition from professional RL or RU, Yes.
Wales, due to its strong love RU, is not a free and unfettered area. There will be a lot of competition for the best young athletes, particularly in the South. They may even lose the young players they produce themselves to RU. I would hope that the RFL now set up a strong amateur base in the North, where there would be much less competition from other pro sports clubs.
A lot will depend on the effort made by the two clubs, and the coaching and academy set-ups. This is why a club needs to be financially viable. It is a very costly and time-consuming business trying to bring your own youth through, and with no guarantee of success. This is why many clubs choose the easy option of bringing in ready-made players from outside their areas.'"
there are 119,000 people in Halton Borough, there are 3million in Wales. To say there are more potential players in Halton than Wales is nonsense.
Quote I actually LOL’d when I reads this. How on earth can you be surrounded on only two sides?
This sort of thing sums you up.
However, it is a very important point. We are not surrounded on two sides; this means that we have very little, or no, competition for both fans and young players from other Super league clubs. This puts us in an, almost, unique and advantageous position.
This is why I challenged you on it. '" It isnt a 'very important point' it is a nonsense point. There are three SL clubs, all bigger than Widnes in the immediate area. The Market in that area is very saturated. There arent going to be a lot of young people in the area that dont play RL because they dont know of the game, there arent going to be many who dont get scouted. The fact there is no club in some of the three hundered and 60 degrees of direction is irrelevant.
Quote I’m concentrating on the club that made the bid, and that wasn’t in Wrexham. Therefore, bringing in their ground as a defence for the Celtic Crusaders, is meaningless. '" i have no idea what point you are making here, or certainly what point you think i was making.
Quote This ‘overall judgement’ is what is confusing me. I cannot, for the life of me, see what on earth they had to offer, other than expansion – when compared to some of the clubs they rejected. We now know that it is very likely that they must have already been heading for financial meltdown, from their attempt to meet their end of the bargain and achieve promotion to NL1 and also look to be impressive there too, even as their bid was made. '" first of all, no we dont. Thats your speculation.
But you cannot see that they had the potential to have good crowds, their attendance in NL1 was only a couple of hundred less the Catalans were in the elite. That they had the potential to have fantastic youth development, opening up a brand new player pool, they had great marketing potential with being the only club in wales and the 'welsh' club. Look at what they had acheived with S4C.
on the flip side, what are the other clubs offering us? as a positve? what is the RFL to sit back and look at say Leigh's or Halifax's bid and say 'you know what, that will really add to the league, thats something we dont already have in abundance done better'?
Quote I agree that the company now running the Widnes Vikings is completely different but, unlike the the Celtic Crusaders/Crusaders, they play in the same stadium, in the same town, in the same colours and with the same fans. It is still exactly the same club. The Crusaders are not. '" it isnt exactly the same club, the club closed down, the playing staff and the name were sold on, just like Crusaders, you may not like it, and i would understand why, but that is how it is.
Quote I agree with what you say about the W/Crusaders. They looked much better right from the start from the shambles of a club the Celtic Crusaders were. They now have a good ground and a better support base. I even thought their playing kit and new look emblem looked great. This is the club they could have been from the start, if the RFL had done as I had suggested'" and they wouldnt have got here without being where they were. Similarly Widnes wouldnt be in the position they were without going all the problems they had.
Quote Now that they will have a clean financial bill of health, it is time for the RFL to come clean and tell us all that they will have a ring-fenced place in Super League, along with the Harlequins and les Catalans'" why would they tell us something they havent done?.
Quote
The problem is, is they have been in a constant state of rebuilding since they entered SL. As a result, it will take much longer. I admit it would be unfair to expect instant results, and that they could never have produced many quality players within the 3 year licence period they were given. Given the poor youth set up they inherited from the Celtic Crusaders, it is hardly surprising. I’m not sure what else they have in place, to recruit young players from their local area, but the setting up of the Scorpions was a step in the right direction. They probably have the first real feeder club in British RL. '" So, even though it was a struggle, we are now in a very good position to move forward. None of this would have been achieved had we not taken the risk.
Quote Yes, I found it strange that some clubs were allowed to have promises, in the form of computer generated stadium images, considered as actual substance, while other clubs already had them in place and they were ignored. Completely baffling. I could see that most of these clubs did have other redeeming areas that surround their clubs but, what Celtic had to offer other than expansion, with all its ambiguous possibilities, I could not see or understand. '" maybe the potential of Wakefield in a new stadium was better than the guarantee of Leigh in a new stadium?
I've already told you what Crusaders offer, you just ignore it or put it under a very vague and broad label of expansion.
Quote I’m not arguing that the Crusaders should have been left in the Championship. Seeing how that league has deteriorated, since the licence era begun, it is nearly impossible for any club to grow there now, imo. '" Glad you agree they should have been promoted.
Quote I think, with the salary cap, it should be easier for smaller clubs to compete. I’m not sure that I entirely agree with the salary cap, but it has been an ever present since the Super league era. '" they can compete, they cant win. And they wont win.
Quote But, unless the RFL quantify this, it will always look like they lack transparency'" That is the point of a qualitative and subjective judgement, it cant be quantified.
Quote Well, no wonder many question the integrity of the bid process. Can you provide a link that confirms that the RFL have stated, once they ave found out who the C grades were, they will just pick the clubs they feel like picking, regardless of its merits (as represented by the bid process)?'" ive already posted one for you, see the YEP link, also try the RFL website,
Quote Then, as the Celtic Crusaders only lasted half a season before requiring financial assistance (in the form of an RFL financial team), does that not cast doubt as to the rigour and, to a certain extent, the integrity of the licence process under the RFL?
When they are running a, supposedly, ‘Stringent’ licence process it is certainly their duty to ensure that the clubs they grant a licence to are financially fit for purpose. '" Or it says things changed in the meantime.
Quote I’m sure they could give us an explination without revealing too much. Anyway, that company no longer exists, so why would it matter anymore?'" but it would exist at the time you wanted them to give you the info. And they couldnt give any opinion without revealing too much, it is far far far beyond the RFLs role to start making public their opinion of a companies financial position.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5870 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="SmokeyTA" Im not disputing they had decided to move to a licensing system. In fact that is what that press release is about. What I am disputing is your clearly paranoid assumption that they had decided how many and which clubs at this point in 2005. They hadnt, that didnt happen until a) negotiations had been completed with sky so that they could decide how many in 2008, and B) the bids had been sumbitted and judged so they could decided who, '"
So you have now moved from this position:
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Again, you are making a massive, frankly a little ridiculous leap from the conclusions of a 2005 strategy document for SL that came from the SL clubs and the RFL, before the franchise system had even been proposed, let alone agreed.'"
To this potision:
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Im not disputing they had decided to move to a licensing system.'"
And now you’re admitting that the franchise system had been proposed, as early as 2005.
As far as the BskyB deal goes, there must have been some agreement reached in 2005, if not earlier, that would run after the current deal they had with them ran out in 2008. There is no way the RFL would be making such bold announcements and giving time-lines out to the press and stating that the licence process will go ahead in 2009, only to look like fools when BskyB turned them down. I would say that the main thing the RFL and BskyB would have to wait for, would be to see if they could get their new expansion clubs in a position to be able to make a licence bid.
All the timelines fit like a glove too.
They make plans to set up a club in France in 2004, which will be entered into SL in 2006, with a 3 year non-relegation clause to take them right up to 2009.
They then approach Leighton Samuel and ask him to set up an RL club in Bridgend, with a 3 year plan to get to SL (provided LS kept his side of the bargain and got the club up to NL1) Leighton Samuel later admitted this in an interview.
They then announce that they have written up a document that states they will be setting up a SL with 2 more clubs, taking it to 14, and that the heartlands wouldn’t be able to provide enough viable clubs to make up the expanded league.
Does this not suggest that they thought they were short of 2 new expansion clubs to take up the slack which they thought the heartlands couldn’t cover?
If they thought that new expansion clubs were needed to take up the slack, as it couldn’t be provided by the heartlands, then what other conclusion could be drawn?
They clearly needed to set up one or more new expansion clubs to make up the shortfall they regarded was there. So they set up two new clubs in les Catalans and the Celtic Crusaders, which would have been up and running for three years and ready for their installment into SL in 2009. It is doubtful that they would go to the trouble of doing this, just to turn them down in 2009. In fact, they were cast iron certs, imo. They had to be, because they had stated back in 2005 that the heartland wouldn’t be able to supply enough clubs which would be of SL standard in 2009.
Or it could be just a happy coincidence that both of these clubs were fit for SL after just over 2 years in existence, and in a position to make up the short fall that the RFL says was there from the heartland clubs?
Yeah, Right!
They knew how many heartland clubs they wanted and how many expansion clubs they needed before 2005. They then took steps to set up the expansion clubs they thought they needed and released a document to tell us all it was necessary. They then began the PR routine with the press and dropping the names of a few new expansion clubs, which they said will also be looked at for a licence, even before they had played a game of RL. That was the primer. There’s nothing definite, but it is obvious where this was leading to, given their past record and method of trying to shoehorn expansion clubs into SL, whether they are ready or not.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" there are 119,000 people in Halton Borough, there are 3million in Wales. To say there are more potential players in Halton than Wales is nonsense.
It isnt a 'very important point' it is a nonsense point. There are three SL clubs, all bigger than Widnes in the immediate area. The Market in that area is very saturated. There arent going to be a lot of young people in the area that dont play RL because they dont know of the game, there arent going to be many who dont get scouted. The fact there is no club in some of the three hundered and 60 degrees of direction is irrelevant.
'"
I have already explained why this could happen. Simply ignoring what I have said, doesn’t make what you are saying here right.
You can have a catchment area of a billion but, if you don’t put the funding and effort into developing youngsters, and lack the quality in infrastructure and coaching, or the club doesn’t have the will to take a chance on playing them in the first team, because they have a policy of no short term pain for long term gain, then the amount of people in your catcment area is irrelevant.
If a club has the serous will to exploit an advantage of being able to make the most of having no completion in an area that consists of 200,000, or more, then that is more than enough to bring a substantial amount of new players to the game.
Your tactic here is to refuse to even acknowledge what I actually said in my earlier reply on the subject. You barely addressed a single point. Either read it again and address the points properly, or admit that you are completely wrong.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" It isnt a 'very important point' it is a nonsense point. There are three SL clubs, all bigger than Widnes in the immediate area. The Market in that area is very saturated. There arent going to be a lot of young people in the area that dont play RL because they dont know of the game, there arent going to be many who dont get scouted. The fact there is no club in some of the three hundered and 60 degrees of direction is irrelevant. '"
So, what about the areas in North and West Cheshire, the Wirral or South West Liverpool, are they saturated?
Is there no opportunity whatsoever there?
Do you think that they are full of RL clubs?
Quote ="SmokeyTA"first of all, no we dont. Thats your speculation.
But you cannot see that they had the potential to have good crowds, their attendance in NL1 was only a couple of hundred less the Catalans were in the elite. That they had the potential to have fantastic youth development, opening up a brand new player pool, they had great marketing potential with being the only club in wales and the 'welsh' club. Look at what they had acheived with S4C. '"
Most of which is dubious, to say the least. I have already told you that Leighton Samuel admitted only having 200 season ticket holders in their first season in SL, at the same time he announced the club was £700k in debt, so god knows how many they will have had in NL1. It doesn’t really fill me with any sort of confidence in their figures.
The S4C link up ended as soon as they entered SL, didn’t it?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" on the flip side, what are the other clubs offering us? as a positve? what is the RFL to sit back and look at say Leigh's or Halifax's bid and say 'you know what, that will really add to the league, thats something we dont already have in abundance done better'?'"
I think that both of these clubs would’ve lasted more than half a season, before needing a team of accountants to keep them afloat, and them move them 150 miles away.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" it isnt exactly the same club, the club closed down, the playing staff and the name were sold on, just like Crusaders, you may not like it, and i would understand why, but that is how it is. '"
It’s not like the Celtic Crudsaders, though is it?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" and they wouldnt have got here without being where they were. Similarly '"
They could have tried there first, and then gone down the route which I have explained that I think they should have taken. Maybe we wouldn’t have had the Games reputation dragged through the mud every few months, in the media, due to one scandal and crisis after another being exposed, which has ultimately led to that clubs financial ruin. I bet the big name sponsors are just queuing up now to get involved with the game, as a result.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" maybe the potential of Wakefield in a new stadium was better than the guarantee of Leigh in a new stadium? '"
And obviously better than Widnes’cast iron financial guarantee (in the form of a £500k bond) from SOC, too.
That’s the RFL’s licence process for you. The indefinite is fine, depending who you are, while the definite is worthless, depending who you are.
I think this had more to do with the politics of setting up the licence system.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" I've already told you what Crusaders offer, you just ignore it or put it under a very vague and broad label of expansion. '"
Little of which had any substance.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Glad you agree they should have been promoted. '"
If the RFL had said they were in from the start, and ensured they weren’t in a position of having to run up crippling debts, in order to live up to being put into SL ahead of several worthy heartland clubs, yes.
The club that presented itself in 2008, no.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" That is the point of a qualitative and subjective judgement, it cant be quantified. '"
It can’t be quantified because the licence process is an ambiguous mountain of sh\te which, imo, the RFL needed it to be. It simply means that the RFL can pick whom they want with complete impunity.
In other words, it lacks even the veneer of transparency. It also failed on several areas.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Or it says things changed in the meantime. '"
What, within 3 months of being granted a licence?
Due diligence would have uncovered the problems CC had, if they were really interested in the first plaace.
Quote ="SmokeyTA"but it would exist at the time you wanted them to give you the info. And they couldnt give any opinion without revealing too much, it is far far far beyond the RFLs role to start making public their opinion of a companies financial position. '"
Quote ="SmokeyTA"'"
There’s nothing stopping them explaining this to us now, after the club has finally gone into administration and out again.
I mean, they may make this mistake again. It would be nice to know that they could explain why they failed to spot the financial problems they had, despite having a fiancial team of their own involved in the club – perhaps it was them who ed them up?
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Pepe"So you have now moved from this position:
To this potision:
And now you’re admitting that the franchise system had been proposed, as early as 2005. '" A franchising system, not the franchising system,
Quote As far as the BskyB deal goes, there must have been some agreement reached in 2005, if not earlier, that would run after the current deal they had with them ran out in 2008. There is no way the RFL would be making such bold announcements and giving time-lines out to the press and stating that the licence process will go ahead in 2009, only to look like fools when BskyB turned them down. I would say that the main thing the RFL and BskyB would have to wait for, would be to see if they could get their new expansion clubs in a position to be able to make a licence bid.
All the timelines fit like a glove too. '" It only 'must' if we agree with your paranoid hypothesis, A perfect example of your circular reasoning. It becomes even more apparent when you the source you are using as evidence explicitly states [iLewis also stressed that plans for expansion were unlikely to take place until the current television deal with BSkyB expires at the end of 2008.[/i
Quote They make plans to set up a club in France in 2004, which will be entered into SL in 2006, with a 3 year non-relegation clause to take them right up to 2009.'" They were due to join in 2005, they chose to delay it by a year. Doesnt quite fit like a glove.
Quote They then approach Leighton Samuel and ask him to set up an RL club in Bridgend, with a 3 year plan to get to SL (provided LS kept his side of the bargain and got the club up to NL1) Leighton Samuel later admitted this in an interview. '" considering your propensity for simply mis-reading/making up statements i will have to ask for evidence
Quote They then announce that they have written up a document that states they will be setting up a SL with 2 more clubs, taking it to 14, and that the heartlands wouldn’t be able to provide enough viable clubs to make up the expanded league.
Does this not suggest that they thought they were short of 2 new expansion clubs to take up the slack which they thought the heartlands couldn’t cover?
If they thought that new expansion clubs were needed to take up the slack, as it couldn’t be provided by the heartlands, then what other conclusion could be drawn?'" "If we don't believe it is sustainable and we don't believe that enough players will come through to give us 14 clubs, we won't do it," he added.
Quote They clearly needed to set up one or more new expansion clubs to make up the shortfall they regarded was there. So they set up two new clubs in les Catalans and the Celtic Crusaders, which would have been up and running for three years and ready for their installment into SL in 2009. It is doubtful that they would go to the trouble of doing this, just to turn them down in 2009. In fact, they were cast iron certs, imo. They had to be, because they had stated back in 2005 that the heartland wouldn’t be able to supply enough clubs which would be of SL standard in 2009.
Or it could be just a happy coincidence that both of these clubs were fit for SL after just over 2 years in existence, and in a position to make up the short fall that the RFL says was there from the heartland clubs?
Yeah, Right!'" Except they didnt, UTC (as they were) were admitted to start in 2005, not 2006, they asked for a delay of one year. They also explicitly told us they didnt know how many clubs they would admit in 2009, in 2005, they didnt decide that until 2008. Your time line is off every step of the way.
Quote They knew how many heartland clubs they wanted and how many expansion clubs they needed before 2005. They then took steps to set up the expansion clubs they thought they needed and released a document to tell us all it was necessary. They then began the PR routine with the press and dropping the names of a few new expansion clubs, which they said will also be looked at for a licence, even before they had played a game of RL. That was the primer. There’s nothing definite, but it is obvious where this was leading to, given their past record and method of trying to shoehorn expansion clubs into SL, whether they are ready or not'" Other than every actual bit of evidence proving you wrong, its a nice story.
Quote I have already explained why this could happen. Simply ignoring what I have said, doesn’t make what you are saying here right.
You can have a catchment area of a billion but, if you don’t put the funding and effort into developing youngsters, and lack the quality in infrastructure and coaching, or the club doesn’t have the will to take a chance on playing them in the first team, because they have a policy of no short term pain for long term gain, then the amount of people in your catcment area is irrelevant.
If a club has the serous will to exploit an advantage of being able to make the most of having no completion in an area that consists of 200,000, or more, then that is more than enough to bring a substantial amount of new players to the game.
Your tactic here is to refuse to even acknowledge what I actually said in my earlier reply on the subject. You barely addressed a single point. Either read it again and address the points properly, or admit that you are completely wrong. '" I think you will find, when you look back, that the tactic you are describing is the one you are using. This isnt an argument over whether you think there is enough space for Widnes, you clearly do, i dont but that wasnt the point you were addressing. Which was again, there is more potential in Wales than in Widnes.
Quote So, what about the areas in North and West Cheshire, the Wirral or South West Liverpool, are they saturated?
Is there no opportunity whatsoever there?
Do you think that they are full of RL clubs?'" No they arent, but there are enough clubs in the area to 'pick up the slack' in these areas as the game grows.
Quote Most of which is dubious, to say the least. I have already told you that Leighton Samuel admitted only having 200 season ticket holders in their first season in SL, at the same time he announced the club was £700k in debt, so god knows how many they will have had in NL1. It doesn’t really fill me with any sort of confidence in their figures.
The S4C link up ended as soon as they entered SL, didn’t it?
'" Of course it is dubious to you, everything which can possibly mean the RFL thought Crusaders were a better bet than Widnes seemed dubious to you. But its irrelevant, the reasons where there, they were valid.
Quote I think that both of these clubs would’ve lasted more than half a season, before needing a team of accountants to keep them afloat, and them move them 150 miles away. '" Whoop di dooo, its not like SL is crying out for small northern towns putting out middling teams in front of mediocre crowds. If thats all they would have offered it simply confirms that Crusaders were the right decision
Quote It’s not like the Celtic Crudsaders, though is it?'" if it makes you feel better
Quote They could have tried there first, and then gone down the route which I have explained that I think they should have taken. Maybe we wouldn’t have had the Games reputation dragged through the mud every few months, in the media, due to one scandal and crisis after another being exposed, which has ultimately led to that clubs financial ruin. I bet the big name sponsors are just queuing up now to get involved with the game, as a result.'" The big name sponsors avoided the game like a plague before hand, so we have lost nothing there. They could have put a club in inner mongolia but nobody was willing to fund one, someone in South Wales was, then on the back of that someone in north wales was, and other people in south wales were. Sounds positive to me.
Quote And obviously better than Widnes’cast iron financial guarantee (in the form of a £500k bond) from SOC, too. '" Widnes were bust, less than a year old, and it tells you something they needed to offer £500k guarantee,
Quote That’s the RFL’s licence process for you. The indefinite is fine, depending who you are, while the definite is worthless, depending who you are.'" Yes, indeed, things are judged as whole.
Quote I think this had more to do with the politics of setting up the licence system.'" you seem to need to.
Quote If the RFL had said they were in from the start, and ensured they weren’t in a position of having to run up crippling debts, in order to live up to being put into SL ahead of several worthy heartland clubs, yes. '" Well, yes, if your paranoid hypothesis was true, the RFL should have done that, but considering it isnt, it would have been silly of them to do so.
BTW who are these worthy heartland clubs?
Quote It can’t be quantified because the licence process is an ambiguous mountain of sh\te which, imo, the RFL needed it to be. It simply means that the RFL can pick whom they want with complete impunity.
In other words, it lacks even the veneer of transparency. It also failed on several areas. '" Well, know, as i just explained to you, it cant be quantified because it was a qualitative judgement, its kind of how qualitative judgements work.
Quote What, within 3 months of being granted a licence?
Due diligence would have uncovered the problems CC had, if they were really interested in the first plaace.'" yes, things can change
Quote
There’s nothing stopping them explaining this to us now, after the club has finally gone into administration and out again.
I mean, they may make this mistake again. It would be nice to know that they could explain why they failed to spot the financial problems they had, despite having a fiancial team of their own involved in the club – perhaps it was them who loved them up?'" Other than it not being there information to give away yes. Other them likely being sued by leighton Samuels for releasing their opinion on private financial information of a company which belonged to him, and of course there being no real reason to do so. Yes they could have done
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Transparency is probably the wrong word for what we actually want
Honest is probably better
Less likely of course
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5870 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="SmokeyTA"A franchising system, not the franchising system'"
It’s pretty clear that, what was proposed, was what happened. Therefore, it was the THE franchising system.
The difference between me and thee now, is that you seem to believe that, in 2005, there was nothing definite. This is despite the RFL and Richard Lewis giving a very detailed account of what it was about, when it would happen, how it would happen and dropping hints as to the inclusion of two new expansion clubs, both of which hadn’t yet played a single game.
Quote ="SmokeyTA"It only 'must' if we agree with your paranoid hypothesis, A perfect example of your circular reasoning. It becomes even more apparent when you the source you are using as evidence explicitly states Lewis also stressed that plans for expansion were unlikely to take place until the current television deal with BSkyB expires at the end of 2008. '"
What’s your point?
Quote ="SmokeyTA"They were due to join in 2005, they chose to delay it by a year. Doesnt quite fit like a glove. '"
That makes little difference. The new clubs are being set up within months of each other, and within months of a report the RFL have released that states the need to expand SL to 14 clubs and, at the same time, states that the heartland areas lack enough SL quality teams to fill those 14 places.
You may regard this as a happy coincidence but I, and many others, do not.
Quote ="SmokeyTA"considering your propensity for simply mis-reading/making up statements i will have to ask for evidence '"
I’ll ignore yet another one of your slurs. I recall reading an article from a link someone on here, or maybe the TIW board, where LS discussed this. I think it was just before, or just after, he bailed out of the club. It may have been on the BBC Sport website, as I’m sure there was a recorded interview as well as a written article. He even mentioned the names of the people who the RFL asked to approach him.
I’ll have a Google when I get time, unless some kind soul who remembers where it is posts it up.
Quote ="SmokeyTA""If we don't believe it is sustainable and we don't believe that enough players will come through to give us 14 clubs, we won't do it," he added. '"
We know that the RFL thought that the heartlands couldn’t provide enough players to a standard that would make competitive clubs for SL. They may, or may not have been right. That’s probably why the RFL thought it better to go with expansion clubs, as they can just recruit a team of antipodeans to make up for the lack of local talent. Heartland clubs don’t have this luxury, or not quite to the same extent anyway – nor should they.
This would have been a good argument to give the new expansion clubs a ring-fenced place. Imo, they knew full well who they wanted and how many clubs they wanted. This doesn’t really change that much, and was probably the RFL’s get out clause, should their new expansion clubs go tits up before 2009, as they clearly didn’t want to fill the extra places with heartland clubs. That would go against everything they have been trying to do since the Super League era started.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Except they didnt, UTC (as they were) were admitted to start in 2005, not 2006, they asked for a delay of one year. '"
It makes no difference. As I have already explained, this process could have been in the making well before 2005. There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever, that Les Catalans were set up to be installed in a licenced SL in 2009. Why you think this makes a difference, I don’t understand.
Aren’t Les Catalans an amalgamation of two French clubs, not just one?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" They also explicitly told us they didnt know how many clubs they would admit in 2009, in 2005, they didnt decide that until 2008. Your time line is off every step of the way '"
I dealt with this matter yesterday, when I pointed out that the RFL would have had to have already gained some sort of initial agreement with BskyB. The main worry, for both parties, would have been that one or both of newly created expansion clubs failed before 2009. Neither party could be sure this wouldn’t happen. We both know that BskyB and the RFL weren’t looking to expand Super league for the benefit of heartland clubs in NL1. This whole process was about expansion; they wouldn’t say so, of course, but do you really think that this isn’t the case?
Therefore, if these expansion clubs were not available at the time of licencing, the league would not be expanded, until they had more expansion clubs in place. They’d already stated that the heartlands couldn’t provide the 14 clubs for expansion anyway. So why would they expand to 14 clubs, when they believe the heartlands cannot sustain 14 clubs?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Other than every actual bit of evidence proving you wrong, its a nice story. '"
Neither of us are in a position to know which one of us is right. You either believe what the RFL tell you, or you don’t.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" I think you will find, when you look back, that the tactic you are describing is the one you are using. This isnt an argument over whether you think there is enough space for Widnes, you clearly do, i dont but that wasnt the point you were addressing. Which was again, there is more potential in Wales than in Widnes. '"
Potential means nothing without the means, determination and ability to use it.
You are ignoring the fact that in South Wales there will be even stiffer competition for players, from local RU clubs, than there is in the heartland RL areas from RL clubs. RU is their national sport and has more money to spend. Most South Walian lads would be more tempted by what RU can offer them, probably even those which may come through the Crusaders’ own youth structure.
Then there’s the North, where no infrastructure for playing the game exists yet. There’s no proper service area or amateur game there. Even if none of this were true, they’d still have to have the right set up to make the most of it.
Widnes, and indeed, the whole of Halton now does have this infrastructure, and a club which is now dedicated to bringing youth through. They also have a first rate infrastructure for bringing them through. This is why we have so many of them in our squad these days, and why they have just had four of it’s young academy players selected for the 2011 England Academy squad for the forthcoming international games against Wales and France.
www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=3392
You must admit that it is impressive to be able to do this from the Championship.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" No they arent, but there are enough clubs in the area to 'pick up the slack' in these areas as the game grows. '"
This depends on the other clubs desire to do so in a meaningful way. It is very unlikely that many Scousers, or people from the Wirral peninsular, would be interested in Warrington unless they lived there. St Helens yes, Warrington, Wigan no.
I know that St Hellens have been active in promoting themselves in the areas of Liverpool which they boarder, particularly in the northern areas. This is why James Graham is now playing for them, who is from that area of Liverpool (maghull). This shows what potential there can be in that area, with a lot of effort. However, I have not heard of any push into South Liverpool, in the areas where Widnes boarder them, or into the Wirral or West Cheshire. These are free from interference from any other local RL clubs and would be more inclined to support Widnes and travel, with their youngsters to play for local amateur clubs, &c.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Of course it is dubious to you, everything which can possibly mean the RFL thought Crusaders were a better bet than Widnes seemed dubious to you. But its irrelevant, the reasons where there, they were valid. '"
It’s not just about Widnes. The way the licence decisions are made, will be of grave concern to every ambitious heartland club, and its fans, below SL.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Whoop di dooo, its not like SL is crying out for small northern towns putting out middling teams in front of mediocre crowds. If thats all they would have offered it simply confirms that Crusaders were the right decision '"
I believe, that if there were no CC or LC at the time of the licence decisions, SL wouldn’t have been expanded to 14 clubs anyway. This was never about them. I just would have liked to have been told this, by the RFL, openly.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" The big name sponsors avoided the game like a plague before hand, so we have lost nothing there. '"
Well, it’s even less likely now!
Quote ="SmokeyTA" They could have put a club in inner mongolia but nobody was willing to fund one, someone in South Wales was, then on the back of that someone in north wales was, and other people in south wales were. Sounds positive to me. '"
Not when they are dealing with a man of Leighton Samuel’s history of running a rugby club. For what he did to the Warriors, he was hated by most in the town they planted the new club too.
There is no reason that they couldn’t have approached someone else, maybe even at Wrexham. It would have even been easier for that club to take them on, as there would have been no baggage from the Bridgend fiasco. It was easy enough to set up the Scorpions fairly quickly. If they had done so, said they will be in SL in 2009, help fund the local RL infrastructure as they did for CC with 7 new amateur clubs along the M4 corridor, plus didn’t force them to have to get to NL1 to make a bid, they may have been in a better financial position and perhaps lasted longer than a season in SL.
I just think they went about the whole thing the wrong way.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Widnes were bust, less than a year old, and it tells you something they needed to offer £500k guarantee, '"
So, the Crusaders are screwed for 2012 then?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Other than it not being there information to give away yes. Other them likely being sued by leighton Samuels for releasing their opinion on private financial information of a company which belonged to him, and of course there being no real reason to do so. Yes they could have done '"
We’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one. It’s difficult to have any faith in a system that goes as disastrously wrong as this did in such a short time. If they can’t be bothered to give us a reason why they failed so miserably, to spot how poor CC’s finances were, then I see no reason to chance my perspective.
|
|
Quote ="SmokeyTA"A franchising system, not the franchising system'"
It’s pretty clear that, what was proposed, was what happened. Therefore, it was the THE franchising system.
The difference between me and thee now, is that you seem to believe that, in 2005, there was nothing definite. This is despite the RFL and Richard Lewis giving a very detailed account of what it was about, when it would happen, how it would happen and dropping hints as to the inclusion of two new expansion clubs, both of which hadn’t yet played a single game.
Quote ="SmokeyTA"It only 'must' if we agree with your paranoid hypothesis, A perfect example of your circular reasoning. It becomes even more apparent when you the source you are using as evidence explicitly states Lewis also stressed that plans for expansion were unlikely to take place until the current television deal with BSkyB expires at the end of 2008. '"
What’s your point?
Quote ="SmokeyTA"They were due to join in 2005, they chose to delay it by a year. Doesnt quite fit like a glove. '"
That makes little difference. The new clubs are being set up within months of each other, and within months of a report the RFL have released that states the need to expand SL to 14 clubs and, at the same time, states that the heartland areas lack enough SL quality teams to fill those 14 places.
You may regard this as a happy coincidence but I, and many others, do not.
Quote ="SmokeyTA"considering your propensity for simply mis-reading/making up statements i will have to ask for evidence '"
I’ll ignore yet another one of your slurs. I recall reading an article from a link someone on here, or maybe the TIW board, where LS discussed this. I think it was just before, or just after, he bailed out of the club. It may have been on the BBC Sport website, as I’m sure there was a recorded interview as well as a written article. He even mentioned the names of the people who the RFL asked to approach him.
I’ll have a Google when I get time, unless some kind soul who remembers where it is posts it up.
Quote ="SmokeyTA""If we don't believe it is sustainable and we don't believe that enough players will come through to give us 14 clubs, we won't do it," he added. '"
We know that the RFL thought that the heartlands couldn’t provide enough players to a standard that would make competitive clubs for SL. They may, or may not have been right. That’s probably why the RFL thought it better to go with expansion clubs, as they can just recruit a team of antipodeans to make up for the lack of local talent. Heartland clubs don’t have this luxury, or not quite to the same extent anyway – nor should they.
This would have been a good argument to give the new expansion clubs a ring-fenced place. Imo, they knew full well who they wanted and how many clubs they wanted. This doesn’t really change that much, and was probably the RFL’s get out clause, should their new expansion clubs go tits up before 2009, as they clearly didn’t want to fill the extra places with heartland clubs. That would go against everything they have been trying to do since the Super League era started.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Except they didnt, UTC (as they were) were admitted to start in 2005, not 2006, they asked for a delay of one year. '"
It makes no difference. As I have already explained, this process could have been in the making well before 2005. There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever, that Les Catalans were set up to be installed in a licenced SL in 2009. Why you think this makes a difference, I don’t understand.
Aren’t Les Catalans an amalgamation of two French clubs, not just one?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" They also explicitly told us they didnt know how many clubs they would admit in 2009, in 2005, they didnt decide that until 2008. Your time line is off every step of the way '"
I dealt with this matter yesterday, when I pointed out that the RFL would have had to have already gained some sort of initial agreement with BskyB. The main worry, for both parties, would have been that one or both of newly created expansion clubs failed before 2009. Neither party could be sure this wouldn’t happen. We both know that BskyB and the RFL weren’t looking to expand Super league for the benefit of heartland clubs in NL1. This whole process was about expansion; they wouldn’t say so, of course, but do you really think that this isn’t the case?
Therefore, if these expansion clubs were not available at the time of licencing, the league would not be expanded, until they had more expansion clubs in place. They’d already stated that the heartlands couldn’t provide the 14 clubs for expansion anyway. So why would they expand to 14 clubs, when they believe the heartlands cannot sustain 14 clubs?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Other than every actual bit of evidence proving you wrong, its a nice story. '"
Neither of us are in a position to know which one of us is right. You either believe what the RFL tell you, or you don’t.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" I think you will find, when you look back, that the tactic you are describing is the one you are using. This isnt an argument over whether you think there is enough space for Widnes, you clearly do, i dont but that wasnt the point you were addressing. Which was again, there is more potential in Wales than in Widnes. '"
Potential means nothing without the means, determination and ability to use it.
You are ignoring the fact that in South Wales there will be even stiffer competition for players, from local RU clubs, than there is in the heartland RL areas from RL clubs. RU is their national sport and has more money to spend. Most South Walian lads would be more tempted by what RU can offer them, probably even those which may come through the Crusaders’ own youth structure.
Then there’s the North, where no infrastructure for playing the game exists yet. There’s no proper service area or amateur game there. Even if none of this were true, they’d still have to have the right set up to make the most of it.
Widnes, and indeed, the whole of Halton now does have this infrastructure, and a club which is now dedicated to bringing youth through. They also have a first rate infrastructure for bringing them through. This is why we have so many of them in our squad these days, and why they have just had four of it’s young academy players selected for the 2011 England Academy squad for the forthcoming international games against Wales and France.
www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=3392
You must admit that it is impressive to be able to do this from the Championship.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" No they arent, but there are enough clubs in the area to 'pick up the slack' in these areas as the game grows. '"
This depends on the other clubs desire to do so in a meaningful way. It is very unlikely that many Scousers, or people from the Wirral peninsular, would be interested in Warrington unless they lived there. St Helens yes, Warrington, Wigan no.
I know that St Hellens have been active in promoting themselves in the areas of Liverpool which they boarder, particularly in the northern areas. This is why James Graham is now playing for them, who is from that area of Liverpool (maghull). This shows what potential there can be in that area, with a lot of effort. However, I have not heard of any push into South Liverpool, in the areas where Widnes boarder them, or into the Wirral or West Cheshire. These are free from interference from any other local RL clubs and would be more inclined to support Widnes and travel, with their youngsters to play for local amateur clubs, &c.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Of course it is dubious to you, everything which can possibly mean the RFL thought Crusaders were a better bet than Widnes seemed dubious to you. But its irrelevant, the reasons where there, they were valid. '"
It’s not just about Widnes. The way the licence decisions are made, will be of grave concern to every ambitious heartland club, and its fans, below SL.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Whoop di dooo, its not like SL is crying out for small northern towns putting out middling teams in front of mediocre crowds. If thats all they would have offered it simply confirms that Crusaders were the right decision '"
I believe, that if there were no CC or LC at the time of the licence decisions, SL wouldn’t have been expanded to 14 clubs anyway. This was never about them. I just would have liked to have been told this, by the RFL, openly.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" The big name sponsors avoided the game like a plague before hand, so we have lost nothing there. '"
Well, it’s even less likely now!
Quote ="SmokeyTA" They could have put a club in inner mongolia but nobody was willing to fund one, someone in South Wales was, then on the back of that someone in north wales was, and other people in south wales were. Sounds positive to me. '"
Not when they are dealing with a man of Leighton Samuel’s history of running a rugby club. For what he did to the Warriors, he was hated by most in the town they planted the new club too.
There is no reason that they couldn’t have approached someone else, maybe even at Wrexham. It would have even been easier for that club to take them on, as there would have been no baggage from the Bridgend fiasco. It was easy enough to set up the Scorpions fairly quickly. If they had done so, said they will be in SL in 2009, help fund the local RL infrastructure as they did for CC with 7 new amateur clubs along the M4 corridor, plus didn’t force them to have to get to NL1 to make a bid, they may have been in a better financial position and perhaps lasted longer than a season in SL.
I just think they went about the whole thing the wrong way.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Widnes were bust, less than a year old, and it tells you something they needed to offer £500k guarantee, '"
So, the Crusaders are screwed for 2012 then?
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Other than it not being there information to give away yes. Other them likely being sued by leighton Samuels for releasing their opinion on private financial information of a company which belonged to him, and of course there being no real reason to do so. Yes they could have done '"
We’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one. It’s difficult to have any faith in a system that goes as disastrously wrong as this did in such a short time. If they can’t be bothered to give us a reason why they failed so miserably, to spot how poor CC’s finances were, then I see no reason to chance my perspective.
|
|
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2016 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Jun 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| smokey, pepe...................get a room and get it on for gods sake!
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4389 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Dec 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Pepe"It’s pretty clear that, what was proposed, was what happened. Therefore, it was the THE franchising system. '" what was proposed. There doesnt seem a proposal with any meat on the bones at all.
Quote The difference between me and thee now, is that you seem to believe that, in 2005, there was nothing definite. This is despite the RFL and Richard Lewis giving a very detailed account of what it was about, when it would happen, how it would happen and dropping hints as to the inclusion of two new expansion clubs, both of which hadn’t yet played a single game. '" lets see some detail then from the 2005 release. The things which had been decided, not things preceeded with uncertain adverbs like if, or maybe, no plans. But you decided detaila.
Quote What’s your point?'" well pretty much what i said. That the decision over how many teams were to participate in the franchised league wasnt made until 2008 as Richard Lewis explicitly states, not 2005 as you proposed. Once we get passed that, your time line and theory descends in to bigger nonsense.
Quote That makes little difference. The new clubs are being set up within months of each other, and within months of a report the RFL have released that states the need to expand SL to 14 clubs and, at the same time, states that the heartland areas lack enough SL quality teams to fill those 14 places. '" So what you were sarcastically referring to as 'coincidence' didnt actually happen at all. The reason for it not being a coincidence no longer applies but it is just dismissed. I like your circular reasoning, its funny.
And again, there werent 14 places yet to fill. We know this, we were explicitly told this.
Quote You may regard this as a happy coincidence but I, and many others, do not.
'"
a coincidence that isnt quite a coincidence. If setting them up to enter in 2006 with a three year no relegation clause, and 2009 being the year franchising starts is your coincidence then your coincidence isnt even that. Les Cats were planned to set up in 2005 with a three year no relegation clause. which only takes them up to 2008. Its a very ill fitting glove you have there.
Quote I’ll ignore yet another one of your slurs. I recall reading an article from a link someone on here, or maybe the TIW board, where LS discussed this. I think it was just before, or just after, he bailed out of the club. It may have been on the BBC Sport website, as I’m sure there was a recorded interview as well as a written article. He even mentioned the names of the people who the RFL asked to approach him. '" shouldnt be too difficult to provide me with evidence then should it.
Quote We know that the RFL thought that the heartlands couldn’t provide enough players to a standard that would make competitive clubs for SL. They may, or may not have been right. That’s probably why the RFL thought it better to go with expansion clubs, as they can just recruit a team of antipodeans to make up for the lack of local talent. Heartland clubs don’t have this luxury, or not quite to the same extent anyway – nor should they.
This would have been a good argument to give the new expansion clubs a ring-fenced place. Imo, they knew full well who they wanted and how many clubs they wanted. This doesn’t really change that much, and was probably the RFL’s get out clause, should their new expansion clubs go tits up before 2009, as they clearly didn’t want to fill the extra places with heartland clubs. That would go against everything they have been trying to do since the Super League era started. '" Yes, maybe that it what they felt, in 2009 when they had viewed the franchise bids. They clearly didnt make this decision in 2005. They have explicitly told us so.
and as such your paranoid hypothesis is shown to be false.
Quote It makes no difference. As I have already explained, this process could have been in the making well before 2005. There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever, that Les Catalans were set up to be installed in a licenced SL in 2009. Why you think this makes a difference, I don’t understand.
Aren’t Les Catalans an amalgamation of two French clubs, not just one?'" of course it makes a difference, your contention was that the Les Catalans were set up to enter in 2006 with a three year exemption taking them up to 2009 when the already decided 14 club SL including 3 expansion clubs would begin (which was decided in 2005). This is proved to be nonsense as A) the RFL have told us they didnt know how many clubs would be in SL in 2009 until 2008. B) they have told us no expansion plans would be made until 2008, and C) Les Catalans were due to join in 2005 with a three year exemption taking them to 2008, a year before the licences. Your idea that everything was already decided is proved wrong every step of the way.
Quote I dealt with this matter yesterday, when I pointed out that the RFL would have had to have already gained some sort of initial agreement with BskyB. The main worry, for both parties, would have been that one or both of newly created expansion clubs failed before 2009. Neither party could be sure this wouldn’t happen. We both know that BskyB and the RFL weren’t looking to expand Super league for the benefit of heartland clubs in NL1. This whole process was about expansion; they wouldn’t say so, of course, but do you really think that this isn’t the case?
'" except they have explicitly told us that they hadnt. They have explicitly told us that this decision hadnt been made. But yes if we ignore all actual evidence and invent our own you do make sense.
Quote Therefore, if these expansion clubs were not available at the time of licencing, the league would not be expanded, until they had more expansion clubs in place. They’d already stated that the heartlands couldn’t provide the 14 clubs for expansion anyway. So why would they expand to 14 clubs, when they believe the heartlands cannot sustain 14 clubs?'" exactly. Why would they? they would likely look at the bids, see if there were 14 which were good enough and if there were let them in. If not dont. I.E they hadnt made any decision until they had viewed the bids
Quote Neither of us are in a position to know which one of us is right. You either believe what the RFL tell you, or you don’t. '" no, you either look at the evidence or you make it up. The fact is you are making it up, Thats why you are dismissed as paranoid.
Quote Potential means nothing without the means, determination and ability to use it. '" well yes it does. It is kind of the point of potential. It is unknown whether or not you can fulfil it.
Quote You are ignoring the fact that in South Wales there will be even stiffer competition for players, from local RU clubs, than there is in the heartland RL areas from RL clubs. RU is their national sport and has more money to spend. Most South Walian lads would be more tempted by what RU can offer them, probably even those which may come through the Crusaders’ own youth structure. '" im not ignoring it. I understand it. You still havent put forward any kind of argument that explains why a small town with a low population with plenty of bigger RL clubs in the immediate area has more potential for growth than a large area with a large population, and no RL clubs.
Then there’s the North, where no infrastructure for playing the game exists yet. There’s no proper service area or amateur game there. Even if none of this were true, they’d still have to have the right set up to make the most of it.
Part of the reason of bringing in a welsh club is to get that infrastructure in place
Quote Widnes, and indeed, the whole of Halton now does have this infrastructure, and a club which is now dedicated to bringing youth through. They also have a first rate infrastructure for bringing them through. This is why we have so many of them in our squad these days, and why they have just had four of it’s young academy players selected for the 2011 England Academy squad for the forthcoming international games against Wales and France.'" good for you. Would all have those been missed if it werent for Widnes?
Without the Crusaders there wouldnt be a welsh squad of any note to play them.
Quote www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=3392
You must admit that it is impressive to be able to do this from the Championship.
'" good on them, well done widnes.
Quote This depends on the other clubs desire to do so in a meaningful way. It is very unlikely that many Scousers, or people from the Wirral peninsular, would be interested in Warrington unless they lived there. St Helens yes, Warrington, Wigan no.
'" But they would Widnes for some reason?
Quote I know that St Hellens have been active in promoting themselves in the areas of Liverpool which they boarder, particularly in the northern areas. This is why James Graham is now playing for them, who is from that area of Liverpool (maghull). This shows what potential there can be in that area, with a lot of effort. However, I have not heard of any push into South Liverpool, in the areas where Widnes boarder them, or into the Wirral or West Cheshire. These are free from interference from any other local RL clubs and would be more inclined to support Widnes and travel, with their youngsters to play for local amateur clubs, &c. '" it will happen as the game grows.
Quote It’s not just about Widnes. The way the licence decisions are made, will be of grave concern to every ambitious heartland club, and its fans, below SL.
I believe, that if there were no CC or LC at the time of the licence decisions, SL wouldn’t have been expanded to 14 clubs anyway. This was never about them. I just would have liked to have been told this, by the RFL, openly. '" who cares what you believe, you have shown you are happy to simply making things up. Show some evidence or this is simply put with the rest of your delusions.
Quote Well, it’s even less likely now!
'" yes, cause sponsors really give a about the financial travails of a single RL club.
Quote Not when they are dealing with a man of Leighton Samuel’s history of running a rugby club. For what he did to the Warriors, he was hated by most in the town they planted the new club too.
There is no reason that they couldn’t have approached someone else, maybe even at Wrexham. It would have even been easier for that club to take them on, as there would have been no baggage from the Bridgend fiasco. It was easy enough to set up the Scorpions fairly quickly. If they had done so, said they will be in SL in 2009, help fund the local RL infrastructure as they did for CC with 7 new amateur clubs along the M4 corridor, plus didn’t force them to have to get to NL1 to make a bid, they may have been in a better financial position and perhaps lasted longer than a season in SL. '" neither wrexham nor scorpions existed or had any interest prior to Crusaders. You do realise time is linear dont you>?
Quote So, the Crusaders are screwed for 2012 then? '" Unless they can offer something Widnes couldnt.
Quote We’ll just have to agree to disagree on this one. It’s difficult to have any faith in a system that goes as disastrously wrong as this did in such a short time. If they can’t be bothered to give us a reason why they failed so miserably, to spot how poor CC’s finances were, then I see no reason to chance my perspective.'" yet you have continued to have faith in a system like P+R despite its years of proven failure. Wierd
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4389 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Dec 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="SmokeyTA"Rambled on for half a page....'"
Give it a bone mate ffs
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 20966 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Feb 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Barry_McKenzie"Give it a bone mate ffs'"
tred to ignore this thread...I blame you for me even looking at it again
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2912 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2024 | Jan 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Reading this thread it is interesting that the "Flat Cap anti-expansionists" mostly want expansion teams to be given a place in SL because they're expansion teams, that fact being important enough to override all other considerations, but the "Pro-expansion" lobby want expansion teams to have to compete with established clubs on criteira they are clearly disadvantaged by.
Which begs the question "who exactly are the anti-expansionists?"
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5506 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Barnacle Bill"Reading this thread it is interesting that the "Flat Cap anti-expansionists" mostly want expansion teams to be given a place in SL because they're expansion teams, that fact being important enough to override all other considerations, but the "Pro-expansion" lobby want expansion teams to have to compete with established clubs on criteira they are clearly disadvantaged by.
Which begs the question "who exactly are the anti-expansionists?"
'"
good question BB - I can only assume they are M62 clubs who want to keep it all to themselves - just in the backyards of Yorks & Lancs folk
just a thought,is it better to have TO13 in SL with 5000 + crowds or Leigh,Fev,Widnes etc etc with 5000 + crowds ? what would be best for the game ?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 9721 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2020 | Apr 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Barnacle Bill"
Which begs the question "who exactly are the anti-expansionists?"
'"
Widnes fans?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1749 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2014 | Nov 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Which begs the question "who exactly are the anti-expansionists?"'"
The RFL ? Cannot expand the game in England but only in those foreign countries that have
their own politicians and a desire for sport.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Barnacle Bill"Reading this thread it is interesting that the "Flat Cap anti-expansionists" mostly want expansion teams to be given a place in SL because they're expansion teams, that fact being important enough to override all other considerations, but the "Pro-expansion" lobby want expansion teams to have to compete with established clubs on criteira they are clearly disadvantaged by.
Which begs the question "who exactly are the anti-expansionists?"
'" I think for a change, you have massively misunderstood what has been said.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1270 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2012 | Jan 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Leaguefan"Widnes fans?'"
awwwww bless
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5870 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
OK, I’m sorry to everyone who is sick of this argument and I will make this my last comment on the matter. Smokey TA can blow smoke through is for the rest of this thread if he wants, but I’ll just ignore it, as we seem to be annoying people.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" lets see some detail then from the 2005 release. The things which had been decided, not things preceeded with uncertain adverbs like if, or maybe, no plans. But you decided detaila.
what was proposed. There doesnt seem a proposal with any meat on the bones at all.'"
Christ, how much flesh do you want on those bones?
Do you think they would say all this, if it wasn’t actually decided that it would be done?
From the 2005 article:
On how many clubs they will expand to:
“The RFL also confirmed plans to expand Super League from 12 to 14 clubs.
On how long P&R would last for, until the licence era began and information about where the new clubs will come from. Presumably, these clubs would be the ones, which the RFL thought would take up the slack, which the heartlands could not supply.
“Promotion and relegation will remain in place for the next four seasons but then potential new clubs are likely to come from London, Wales or France”
On how long each licence period will run and what teams will be judged on.
“Thereafter, the RFL will only consider admitting new teams on a three-yearly franchise system based on clubs' infrastructure, finance and results.”
Names of the actual clubs, which will be setting up as pro RL clubs, with a view to being ready for 2009:
“Toulouse have expressed their desire to join Perpignan, who will join the elite division next February, and an application from a Welsh club to be based in Bridgend will be considered by the RFL Council in July.”
On the chances of ambitious lower league clubs still being able to reach Super League, with the hint that it will not be a closed shop:
“But executive chairman Richard Lewis insists ambitious non-Super League clubs will still be able to reach the top and says the National League clubs have given their backing to the blueprint.”
On when preliminary assessments for SL clubs will take place:
“He added that all 12 Super League clubs will undergo an assessment in 2006”
On how it will affect SL fixtures:
“The increase in the number of teams will lead to a reduction in Super League fixtures, since it will remove the need for additional games and enable clubs to play each other home and away.”
…And there’s more that I could have put up, and that is just from that 2005 article!
I would suggest that the 2005 strategy document for Super League report would probably contain a much more detailed, account. That, which was put to the media was more than enough to show that there was plenty of meat on the bones, which shows that, barring disaster, this would definitely be going ahead in 2009. This was, and is not, some far away whimsical fancy, which may or may not take place.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" well pretty much what i said. That the decision over how many teams were to participate in the franchised league wasnt made until 2008 as Richard Lewis explicitly states, not 2005 as you proposed. Once we get passed that, your time line and theory descends in to bigger nonsense.'"
The decision to go to 14 clubs was clearly made in 2005, as outlined by the Strategy For Super League document. The only proviso was that SL wouldn’t expand to 14 if they didn’t believe there was enough clubs who would have access to enough quality players in order to make them competitive. They had already stated, in the SFSL report, that the heartland clubs would not be able to provide this. That can only lead to one conclusion; they needed the new expansion clubs which, coincidently, they had already begun the process of setting up in 2004.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" shouldnt be too difficult to provide me with evidence then should it.'"
You have me over a barrel on this one, Smokey. I have had a brief scout across the net, but haven’t found it yet. As it means reading every Celtic Crusaders report over the last 18 months or so, I may not find it. I can’t be bothered doing that for the sake of a daft argument. By now, it may even have been removed from whatever website it was on. All I will say, is that what I have said is true. Obviously, you will not believe it. I will keep looking though.
However, I did find this link, while looking for the other, where LS states that:
"I was approached in 2004 to start up a club that was capable of getting into Super League by 2009," said Samuel.
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 134656.stm
This basically confirms that the RFL wanted them ready to be included in SL by 2009. Not 2007, 2010, 2012 or 2020, but by the year they had planned for SL expansion and licences a year later, in the 2005 report.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" So what you were sarcastically referring to as 'coincidence' didnt actually happen at all. The reason for it not being a coincidence no longer applies but it is just dismissed. I like your circular reasoning, its funny.
And again, there werent 14 places yet to fill. We know this, we were explicitly told this.'"
Here’s the timeline. Coupled with Leighton Samuels admission that the Celtic Crusaders were being set up for the purpose of being placed in SL, even as early as 2004, shows there is something in what I am suggesting. So, it is safe to say that the the RFl had been thinking about the licence process, and whom they want to see in SL, as early as 2004.
2004: The RFL set up two new expansion clubs, telling at least one of them that they need to be capable of getting into Super league in 2009.
2005: they come up with the Strategy For Super league report, which states that “that the competition should be expanded to 14 clubs and said it was not felt the heartland would be able to sustain that number of Super League clubs.” . It also announces that Super League will now be a licenced franchise competition from 2009 onwards. This ties in nicely with the setting up of two new expansion clubs the year before.
2006: The SL clubs go through a dummy run of submitting licence bids, which would allow all parties to assess what is needed for 2008. This seems to be confirmation that the process is a rock solid policy of their intentions to go ahead with a full scale bid process in 2008.
2008: more details are given to the press, which leads to speculation that both the Celtic Crusaders and Les Catalans are both favourites to gain licences. Later on in the year, this is proven to be correct.
2009: the licence era begins as promised. The heartland did not take up all 14 places, and the two new clubs, set up in 2004 were both included.
Again, is it a coincidence that they had these two clubs approached and set up, just a year before announcing their plans in 2004, which states categorically that the heartland clubs could not fill the a 14 club SL?
If you think that this is a coincidence, and these clubs were never destined from the outset to receive a licence in 2009, as long as they were still in business, then I honestly see no further point in arguing with you. It looks as obvious as the nose on my face, to me.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Yes, maybe that it what they felt, in 2009 when they had viewed the franchise bids. They clearly didnt make this decision in 2005. They have explicitly told us so.
and as such your paranoid hypothesis is shown to be false.'"
No, they clearly felt in the 2005 SFSL report, and, undoubtedly, in 2004, when they decided they needed to set up two new expansion clubs that year to be ready for the 2008 licence process.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" of course it makes a difference, your contention was that the Les Catalans were set up to enter in 2006 with a three year exemption taking them up to 2009 when the already decided 14 club SL including 3 expansion clubs would begin (which was decided in 2005). This is proved to be nonsense as A) the RFL have told us they didnt know how many clubs would be in SL in 2009 until 2008. B) they have told us no expansion plans would be made until 2008, and C) Les Catalans were due to join in 2005 with a three year exemption taking them to 2008, a year before the licences. Your idea that everything was already decided is proved wrong every step of the way.'"
It Makes no difference at all how many years Les Catalans would have a non-relegation clause for. Whether it was for three or four is irrelevant. What matters, is they were approached to be set up, along with the Celtic Crusaders, a year before they released a document which stated they would be extending the league to 14, and that there weren’t enough quality heartland clubs to fill it. The main thing is that Les Catalans were given up until 2009 which took them up nicely to when they would be secure of a place forever. Whether that period started from 2005 or 2006 is irrelevant. My conclusions still stand.
The RFL didn’t decide on SL expansion to 14 in 2008, it was in 2005 when they announced it in the SFSL document and to the media. They stated, at the time (2005), that it would not begin until after 2008, when the current TV contract ends. That is not the same thing as you are saying.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" except they have explicitly told us that they hadnt. They have explicitly told us that this decision hadnt been made. But yes if we ignore all actual evidence and invent our own you do make sense.'"
Where did the RFL ‘explicitly’ tell us in 2005 that they hadn’t had an agreement in place, to begin the process of moving to a licence system with 14 clubs?
They must have had some sort of agreement in place with BskyB in order to begin this process, otherwise it would have been a very expansive waste of time, effort and money, over a 3 year period. I’ve no doubt that they would have had to thrash out the finer detail with them later on, but they must already have come to an initial agreement. RL is one of Sky Sports’ flagship sports and must be in constant touch with the RFL on any changes to the structure of the game, which may be taking place. It would be extremely naive to suggest that they wouldn’t. I would suggest that the whole idea of licencing and league expansion probably came about at a meeting between RFL and BskyB officials sometime in 2003-2004.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" exactly. Why would they? they would likely look at the bids, see if there were 14 which were good enough and if there were let them in. If not dont. I.E they hadnt made any decision until they had viewed the bids'"
…Or, which is more likely in my opinion, they had decided that the heartlands wouldn’t be able to sustain 14 SL clubs and they needed a couple more expansion clubs, as early as 2004, when they went about setting them up. From then on, providing they were still around, both of these clubs would be licenced for 2009. It is probable, imo, that this made negotiations with people like Leighton Samuel and the LC officials easier, if they were promised a licence in 2009. There is no way LS would have bought into RL without that promise, imo.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" no, you either look at the evidence or you make it up. The fact is you are making it up, Thats why you are dismissed as paranoid.'"
I’m not paranoid and I’m not making things up. I am commenting on what we know to have happened and on statements given to the press by those involved. I am clearly stating what I ‘m saying as merely being my opinion. As neither of us know the exact details of what went on, we can only use the timelines and history of events which took place, along with all the strange decisions made by the RFL, and draw our own conclusions.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" well yes it does. It is kind of the point of potential. It is unknown whether or not you can fulfil it.'"
Correct!
Therefore, it’s not the best way to judge if a club is suitable for a 3 year licence in SL, as you are suggesting. If it was, all those clubs with potential like Paris, Celtic Crusaders, Gateshead and Fulham or the London Broncos would still be around in SL and thriving. They’re not though, are they?
This is because the RFL just looked at what they thought was their potential and threw them in at the deep end, while trying to pretend that they were as good as some of the best lower league clubs, when they clearly weren’t.
I think the RFL need to take a broader look at the way they are trying to expand the game in non heartland areas.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" im not ignoring it. I understand it. You still havent put forward any kind of argument that explains why a small town with a low population with plenty of bigger RL clubs in the immediate area has more potential for growth than a large area with a large population, and no RL clubs.
Then there’s the North, where no infrastructure for playing the game exists yet. There’s no proper service area or amateur game there. Even if none of this were true, they’d still have to have the right set up to make the most of it. '"
I did explain it, it’s just that you won’t accept that you are wrong.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Part of the reason of bringing in a welsh club is to get that infrastructure in place '"
Then they are putting the cart before the horse.
To be fair, I think that the RFL wouldn’t have done this, if they intended to put the club in Wrxham in the first place. Because they were to go to South Wales, they did put in some amateur clubs in the area.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" good for you. Would all have those been missed if it werent for Widnes?'"
Evidently, or they would have been in someone else’s academies and not at Widnes.
There is only so many places for young players, and there is only a finite number of places for each position available at those local SL clubs, yet there is an abundance of talent which will miss out. This area, in particular, is not as saturated with RL clubs as it is in Yorkshire, and there is plenty of room for the three local clubs outside of their boundaries to find young talent and bring in more fans.
There is also the question of how much effort the other SL clubs are willing to put into bringing through youngsters, particularly from outside there boundaries. If the other clubs don’t bother, then all that potential goes to waste.
Then there’s the quality of coaching and the support given to these youngsters as well as the infrastructure and environment in which they are learning. This is all top notch now at Widnes. They are trying new things too, with some of our young players being put in positions with NRL clubs and learning from the best youth coaches in the sport. We have already started this process, with Anthony Mullally now in the Brisbane Broncos youth set up.
There’s far more to than just how many people you have within a clubs boundaries. None of this suits you simplistic argument though.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" But they would Widnes for some reason?'"
Yes, because they are the most local team and one which they are very aware of. Many people already come to watch Widnes from these areas, and as a percentage, I would bet it is more than any club in this area, except maybe St Helens. You only have to spen a short while on the TIW board to find out where many of the fans come from. Runcorn, Liverpool, West Cheshire and the The Wirral, even parts of Warrington and Wales!
This is before a concerted attempt to woo them begins in earnest. They’re already here and more of them will be coming shortly. This is a stated aim of Steve O’Connor.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" who cares what you believe, you have shown you are happy to simply making things up. Show some evidence or this is simply put with the rest of your delusions.'"
You apparently.
I’m not telling lies or making things up. I am putting over my point of view. I am stating what I think is has happened from the events which have actually taken place and the things which, those people in the know, have said. Unlike you, I am not willing to take the RFL’s word on everything they say.
If Richard Lewis was caught red handed humping a live chicken, and he said that he was merely checking for eggs, you’d believe him.
neither wrexham nor scorpions existed or had any interest prior to Crusaders. You do realise time is linear dont you?
Did either the people who run the Scorpions or the people at Wrexham actually approach the RFL, or did the RFL approach them?
It is my contention that the RFL made enquiries with the people concerned, only in desperation and as it was clear that the Celtic Crusaders were heading for the rocks. I wish they had done it sooner rather than later.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" yet you have continued to have faith in a system like P+R despite its years of proven failure. Weird'"
I love the concept of P&R and I think the RFL could have still moved the game forward using it. The only thing I think is an advantage with this system is the fact it helps protect expansion clubs from relegation. Now that is a very good reason for having it in place, but I find the concept a tad sterile. I like the end of season relegation battles and I like to see fresh blood in Super League every year. I am at odds with the chairman of my own club on this one. He thinks the licence system is a great idea.
For what it’s worth, I regard expansion as necessary if the game is to remain fully pro and with a lucrative TV deal as well as attracting top sponsorship money. The world has changed and it’s not 1960 anymore. There’s a million TV channels to choose from and we have many other avenues of pleasure we can pursue, which were just not available in those days.
TV companies need lots of advertising revenue to make their broadcasts pay. A better demographic, that would come with a national footprint would help the RFL negotiate a better deal and help keep our sport on the air. It would also help its profile in the media which, in turn, gives the game a higher profile which is what potential sponsors want. It is just the way that I believe the RFL go about the business of expanding the game that I take issue with.
I wish all the expansion clubs well, and hope they prosper.
|
|
OK, I’m sorry to everyone who is sick of this argument and I will make this my last comment on the matter. Smokey TA can blow smoke through is for the rest of this thread if he wants, but I’ll just ignore it, as we seem to be annoying people.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" lets see some detail then from the 2005 release. The things which had been decided, not things preceeded with uncertain adverbs like if, or maybe, no plans. But you decided detaila.
what was proposed. There doesnt seem a proposal with any meat on the bones at all.'"
Christ, how much flesh do you want on those bones?
Do you think they would say all this, if it wasn’t actually decided that it would be done?
From the 2005 article:
On how many clubs they will expand to:
“The RFL also confirmed plans to expand Super League from 12 to 14 clubs.
On how long P&R would last for, until the licence era began and information about where the new clubs will come from. Presumably, these clubs would be the ones, which the RFL thought would take up the slack, which the heartlands could not supply.
“Promotion and relegation will remain in place for the next four seasons but then potential new clubs are likely to come from London, Wales or France”
On how long each licence period will run and what teams will be judged on.
“Thereafter, the RFL will only consider admitting new teams on a three-yearly franchise system based on clubs' infrastructure, finance and results.”
Names of the actual clubs, which will be setting up as pro RL clubs, with a view to being ready for 2009:
“Toulouse have expressed their desire to join Perpignan, who will join the elite division next February, and an application from a Welsh club to be based in Bridgend will be considered by the RFL Council in July.”
On the chances of ambitious lower league clubs still being able to reach Super League, with the hint that it will not be a closed shop:
“But executive chairman Richard Lewis insists ambitious non-Super League clubs will still be able to reach the top and says the National League clubs have given their backing to the blueprint.”
On when preliminary assessments for SL clubs will take place:
“He added that all 12 Super League clubs will undergo an assessment in 2006”
On how it will affect SL fixtures:
“The increase in the number of teams will lead to a reduction in Super League fixtures, since it will remove the need for additional games and enable clubs to play each other home and away.”
…And there’s more that I could have put up, and that is just from that 2005 article!
I would suggest that the 2005 strategy document for Super League report would probably contain a much more detailed, account. That, which was put to the media was more than enough to show that there was plenty of meat on the bones, which shows that, barring disaster, this would definitely be going ahead in 2009. This was, and is not, some far away whimsical fancy, which may or may not take place.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" well pretty much what i said. That the decision over how many teams were to participate in the franchised league wasnt made until 2008 as Richard Lewis explicitly states, not 2005 as you proposed. Once we get passed that, your time line and theory descends in to bigger nonsense.'"
The decision to go to 14 clubs was clearly made in 2005, as outlined by the Strategy For Super League document. The only proviso was that SL wouldn’t expand to 14 if they didn’t believe there was enough clubs who would have access to enough quality players in order to make them competitive. They had already stated, in the SFSL report, that the heartland clubs would not be able to provide this. That can only lead to one conclusion; they needed the new expansion clubs which, coincidently, they had already begun the process of setting up in 2004.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" shouldnt be too difficult to provide me with evidence then should it.'"
You have me over a barrel on this one, Smokey. I have had a brief scout across the net, but haven’t found it yet. As it means reading every Celtic Crusaders report over the last 18 months or so, I may not find it. I can’t be bothered doing that for the sake of a daft argument. By now, it may even have been removed from whatever website it was on. All I will say, is that what I have said is true. Obviously, you will not believe it. I will keep looking though.
However, I did find this link, while looking for the other, where LS states that:
"I was approached in 2004 to start up a club that was capable of getting into Super League by 2009," said Samuel.
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 134656.stm
This basically confirms that the RFL wanted them ready to be included in SL by 2009. Not 2007, 2010, 2012 or 2020, but by the year they had planned for SL expansion and licences a year later, in the 2005 report.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" So what you were sarcastically referring to as 'coincidence' didnt actually happen at all. The reason for it not being a coincidence no longer applies but it is just dismissed. I like your circular reasoning, its funny.
And again, there werent 14 places yet to fill. We know this, we were explicitly told this.'"
Here’s the timeline. Coupled with Leighton Samuels admission that the Celtic Crusaders were being set up for the purpose of being placed in SL, even as early as 2004, shows there is something in what I am suggesting. So, it is safe to say that the the RFl had been thinking about the licence process, and whom they want to see in SL, as early as 2004.
2004: The RFL set up two new expansion clubs, telling at least one of them that they need to be capable of getting into Super league in 2009.
2005: they come up with the Strategy For Super league report, which states that “that the competition should be expanded to 14 clubs and said it was not felt the heartland would be able to sustain that number of Super League clubs.” . It also announces that Super League will now be a licenced franchise competition from 2009 onwards. This ties in nicely with the setting up of two new expansion clubs the year before.
2006: The SL clubs go through a dummy run of submitting licence bids, which would allow all parties to assess what is needed for 2008. This seems to be confirmation that the process is a rock solid policy of their intentions to go ahead with a full scale bid process in 2008.
2008: more details are given to the press, which leads to speculation that both the Celtic Crusaders and Les Catalans are both favourites to gain licences. Later on in the year, this is proven to be correct.
2009: the licence era begins as promised. The heartland did not take up all 14 places, and the two new clubs, set up in 2004 were both included.
Again, is it a coincidence that they had these two clubs approached and set up, just a year before announcing their plans in 2004, which states categorically that the heartland clubs could not fill the a 14 club SL?
If you think that this is a coincidence, and these clubs were never destined from the outset to receive a licence in 2009, as long as they were still in business, then I honestly see no further point in arguing with you. It looks as obvious as the nose on my face, to me.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Yes, maybe that it what they felt, in 2009 when they had viewed the franchise bids. They clearly didnt make this decision in 2005. They have explicitly told us so.
and as such your paranoid hypothesis is shown to be false.'"
No, they clearly felt in the 2005 SFSL report, and, undoubtedly, in 2004, when they decided they needed to set up two new expansion clubs that year to be ready for the 2008 licence process.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" of course it makes a difference, your contention was that the Les Catalans were set up to enter in 2006 with a three year exemption taking them up to 2009 when the already decided 14 club SL including 3 expansion clubs would begin (which was decided in 2005). This is proved to be nonsense as A) the RFL have told us they didnt know how many clubs would be in SL in 2009 until 2008. B) they have told us no expansion plans would be made until 2008, and C) Les Catalans were due to join in 2005 with a three year exemption taking them to 2008, a year before the licences. Your idea that everything was already decided is proved wrong every step of the way.'"
It Makes no difference at all how many years Les Catalans would have a non-relegation clause for. Whether it was for three or four is irrelevant. What matters, is they were approached to be set up, along with the Celtic Crusaders, a year before they released a document which stated they would be extending the league to 14, and that there weren’t enough quality heartland clubs to fill it. The main thing is that Les Catalans were given up until 2009 which took them up nicely to when they would be secure of a place forever. Whether that period started from 2005 or 2006 is irrelevant. My conclusions still stand.
The RFL didn’t decide on SL expansion to 14 in 2008, it was in 2005 when they announced it in the SFSL document and to the media. They stated, at the time (2005), that it would not begin until after 2008, when the current TV contract ends. That is not the same thing as you are saying.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" except they have explicitly told us that they hadnt. They have explicitly told us that this decision hadnt been made. But yes if we ignore all actual evidence and invent our own you do make sense.'"
Where did the RFL ‘explicitly’ tell us in 2005 that they hadn’t had an agreement in place, to begin the process of moving to a licence system with 14 clubs?
They must have had some sort of agreement in place with BskyB in order to begin this process, otherwise it would have been a very expansive waste of time, effort and money, over a 3 year period. I’ve no doubt that they would have had to thrash out the finer detail with them later on, but they must already have come to an initial agreement. RL is one of Sky Sports’ flagship sports and must be in constant touch with the RFL on any changes to the structure of the game, which may be taking place. It would be extremely naive to suggest that they wouldn’t. I would suggest that the whole idea of licencing and league expansion probably came about at a meeting between RFL and BskyB officials sometime in 2003-2004.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" exactly. Why would they? they would likely look at the bids, see if there were 14 which were good enough and if there were let them in. If not dont. I.E they hadnt made any decision until they had viewed the bids'"
…Or, which is more likely in my opinion, they had decided that the heartlands wouldn’t be able to sustain 14 SL clubs and they needed a couple more expansion clubs, as early as 2004, when they went about setting them up. From then on, providing they were still around, both of these clubs would be licenced for 2009. It is probable, imo, that this made negotiations with people like Leighton Samuel and the LC officials easier, if they were promised a licence in 2009. There is no way LS would have bought into RL without that promise, imo.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" no, you either look at the evidence or you make it up. The fact is you are making it up, Thats why you are dismissed as paranoid.'"
I’m not paranoid and I’m not making things up. I am commenting on what we know to have happened and on statements given to the press by those involved. I am clearly stating what I ‘m saying as merely being my opinion. As neither of us know the exact details of what went on, we can only use the timelines and history of events which took place, along with all the strange decisions made by the RFL, and draw our own conclusions.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" well yes it does. It is kind of the point of potential. It is unknown whether or not you can fulfil it.'"
Correct!
Therefore, it’s not the best way to judge if a club is suitable for a 3 year licence in SL, as you are suggesting. If it was, all those clubs with potential like Paris, Celtic Crusaders, Gateshead and Fulham or the London Broncos would still be around in SL and thriving. They’re not though, are they?
This is because the RFL just looked at what they thought was their potential and threw them in at the deep end, while trying to pretend that they were as good as some of the best lower league clubs, when they clearly weren’t.
I think the RFL need to take a broader look at the way they are trying to expand the game in non heartland areas.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" im not ignoring it. I understand it. You still havent put forward any kind of argument that explains why a small town with a low population with plenty of bigger RL clubs in the immediate area has more potential for growth than a large area with a large population, and no RL clubs.
Then there’s the North, where no infrastructure for playing the game exists yet. There’s no proper service area or amateur game there. Even if none of this were true, they’d still have to have the right set up to make the most of it. '"
I did explain it, it’s just that you won’t accept that you are wrong.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" Part of the reason of bringing in a welsh club is to get that infrastructure in place '"
Then they are putting the cart before the horse.
To be fair, I think that the RFL wouldn’t have done this, if they intended to put the club in Wrxham in the first place. Because they were to go to South Wales, they did put in some amateur clubs in the area.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" good for you. Would all have those been missed if it werent for Widnes?'"
Evidently, or they would have been in someone else’s academies and not at Widnes.
There is only so many places for young players, and there is only a finite number of places for each position available at those local SL clubs, yet there is an abundance of talent which will miss out. This area, in particular, is not as saturated with RL clubs as it is in Yorkshire, and there is plenty of room for the three local clubs outside of their boundaries to find young talent and bring in more fans.
There is also the question of how much effort the other SL clubs are willing to put into bringing through youngsters, particularly from outside there boundaries. If the other clubs don’t bother, then all that potential goes to waste.
Then there’s the quality of coaching and the support given to these youngsters as well as the infrastructure and environment in which they are learning. This is all top notch now at Widnes. They are trying new things too, with some of our young players being put in positions with NRL clubs and learning from the best youth coaches in the sport. We have already started this process, with Anthony Mullally now in the Brisbane Broncos youth set up.
There’s far more to than just how many people you have within a clubs boundaries. None of this suits you simplistic argument though.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" But they would Widnes for some reason?'"
Yes, because they are the most local team and one which they are very aware of. Many people already come to watch Widnes from these areas, and as a percentage, I would bet it is more than any club in this area, except maybe St Helens. You only have to spen a short while on the TIW board to find out where many of the fans come from. Runcorn, Liverpool, West Cheshire and the The Wirral, even parts of Warrington and Wales!
This is before a concerted attempt to woo them begins in earnest. They’re already here and more of them will be coming shortly. This is a stated aim of Steve O’Connor.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" who cares what you believe, you have shown you are happy to simply making things up. Show some evidence or this is simply put with the rest of your delusions.'"
You apparently.
I’m not telling lies or making things up. I am putting over my point of view. I am stating what I think is has happened from the events which have actually taken place and the things which, those people in the know, have said. Unlike you, I am not willing to take the RFL’s word on everything they say.
If Richard Lewis was caught red handed humping a live chicken, and he said that he was merely checking for eggs, you’d believe him.
neither wrexham nor scorpions existed or had any interest prior to Crusaders. You do realise time is linear dont you?
Did either the people who run the Scorpions or the people at Wrexham actually approach the RFL, or did the RFL approach them?
It is my contention that the RFL made enquiries with the people concerned, only in desperation and as it was clear that the Celtic Crusaders were heading for the rocks. I wish they had done it sooner rather than later.
Quote ="SmokeyTA" yet you have continued to have faith in a system like P+R despite its years of proven failure. Weird'"
I love the concept of P&R and I think the RFL could have still moved the game forward using it. The only thing I think is an advantage with this system is the fact it helps protect expansion clubs from relegation. Now that is a very good reason for having it in place, but I find the concept a tad sterile. I like the end of season relegation battles and I like to see fresh blood in Super League every year. I am at odds with the chairman of my own club on this one. He thinks the licence system is a great idea.
For what it’s worth, I regard expansion as necessary if the game is to remain fully pro and with a lucrative TV deal as well as attracting top sponsorship money. The world has changed and it’s not 1960 anymore. There’s a million TV channels to choose from and we have many other avenues of pleasure we can pursue, which were just not available in those days.
TV companies need lots of advertising revenue to make their broadcasts pay. A better demographic, that would come with a national footprint would help the RFL negotiate a better deal and help keep our sport on the air. It would also help its profile in the media which, in turn, gives the game a higher profile which is what potential sponsors want. It is just the way that I believe the RFL go about the business of expanding the game that I take issue with.
I wish all the expansion clubs well, and hope they prosper.
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5870 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Barnacle Bill"Reading this thread it is interesting that the "Flat Cap anti-expansionists" mostly want expansion teams to be given a place in SL because they're expansion teams, that fact being important enough to override all other considerations, but the "Pro-expansion" lobby want expansion teams to have to compete with established clubs on criteira they are clearly disadvantaged by.
Which begs the question "who exactly are the anti-expansionists?"
'"
You’re right.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5506 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Pepe
I think the RFL need to take a broader look at the way they are trying to expand the game in non heartland areas.
Then there’s the quality of coaching and the support given to these youngsters as well as the infrastructure and environment in which they are learning. This is all top notch now at Widnes. They are trying new things too, with some of our young players being put in positions with NRL clubs and learning from the best youth coaches in the sport. We have already started this process, with Anthony Mullally now in the Brisbane Broncos youth set up.
It is my contention that the RFL made enquiries with the people concerned, only in desperation and as it was clear that the Celtic Crusaders were heading for the rocks. I wish they had done it sooner rather than later.
I love the concept of P&R and I think the RFL could have still moved the game forward using it. The only thing I think is an advantage with this system is the fact it helps protect expansion clubs from relegation. Now that is a very good reason for having it in place, but I find the concept a tad sterile. I like the end of season relegation battles and I like to see fresh blood in Super League every year. I am at odds with the chairman of my own club on this one. He thinks the licence system is a great idea.
For what it’s worth, I regard expansion as necessary if the game is to remain fully pro and with a lucrative TV deal as well as attracting top sponsorship money. The world has changed and it’s not 1960 anymore. There’s a million TV channels to choose from and we have many other avenues of pleasure we can pursue, which were just not available in those days.
TV companies need lots of advertising revenue to make their broadcasts pay. A better demographic, that would come with a national footprint would help the RFL negotiate a better deal and help keep our sport on the air. It would also help its profile in the media which, in turn, gives the game a higher profile which is what potential sponsors want. It is just the way that I believe the RFL go about the business of expanding the game that I take issue with.
I wish all the expansion clubs well, and hope they prosper.'"
agree with most of what you say Pepe and I have included the most salient points as I see them :
P & R will be back,not yet unfortunately but in about five years when our minority sport is on it's knees and most of the C/C1 clubs are on the brink
SOC is obviously for franchising etc but what would he think of it if he was chairman at almost any of the other C/C1 clubs ? clubs whose only hope hope of hitting the big-time is by P & R ?
you have to have something to aim for in life - the dream or the acheivable has to be there if not,why bother ?
It's like watching yet another Industrial Area go up out of town with all the familiar brand names installed whilst watching the old high street shops close and boarded up,never to be seen again.......sad,or what ?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="Pepe"OK, I’m sorry to everyone who is sick of this argument and I will make this my last comment on the matter. Smokey TA can blow smoke through is booty for the rest of this thread if he wants, but I’ll just ignore it, as we seem to be annoying people.
Christ, how much flesh do you want on those bones?
Do you think they would say all this, if it wasn’t actually decided that it would be done?
From the 2005 article:
On how many clubs they will expand to:'"
“The RFL also confirmed plans to expand Super League from 12 to 14 clubs.'" Which they immediately explained was dependent upon talks which were to happen in 2008. Then they confirmed these PLANS in 2008 having had the talks. Again, nothing set in stone as you have claimed.
you are 0 for 1
Quote On how long P&R would last for, until the licence era began and information about where the new clubs will come from. Presumably, these clubs would be the ones, which the RFL thought would take up the slack, which the heartlands could not supply.
“Promotion and relegation will remain in place for the next four seasons but then potential new clubs are likely to come from London, Wales or France” '" These are POTENTIAL clubs, who are LIKELY to come from these places. It certainly mentions nothing about anything been decided which is your main contention.
you are 0 for 2
Quote On how long each licence period will run and what teams will be judged on.
“Thereafter, the RFL will only consider admitting new teams on a three-yearly franchise system based on clubs' infrastructure, finance and results.”'" so different to the actual process, But you are saying it was set in stone? 0 for 3
Quote Names of the actual clubs, which will be setting up as pro RL clubs, with a view to being ready for 2009:
“Toulouse have expressed their desire to join Perpignan, who will join the elite division next February, and an application from a Welsh club to be based in Bridgend will be considered by the RFL Council in July.”'" So Toulouse want to, but HAVENT, and didnt. Bridgened will be CONSIDERED
0 for 4
Quote On the chances of ambitious lower league clubs still being able to reach Super League, with the hint that it will not be a closed shop:
“But executive chairman Richard Lewis insists ambitious non-Super League clubs will still be able to reach the top and says the National League clubs have given their backing to the blueprint.”'" Doesnt mention anything about the process so is a little irrelevant, but are you really arguing that the RFL speaking to and getting back from the lower leagues is evidence of their lack of transparency
Quote On when preliminary assessments for SL clubs will take place:
“He added that all 12 Super League clubs will undergo an assessment in 2006”'" And?
0 for 5
Quote On how it will affect SL fixtures:
“The increase in the number of teams will lead to a reduction in Super League fixtures, since it will remove the need for additional games and enable clubs to play each other home and away.”'"
Quote …And there’s more that I could have put up, and that is just from that 2005 article!'" well you should have done, because nothing in their is evidence of anything been decided. Which is your main argument.
Quote I would suggest that the 2005 strategy document for Super League report would probably contain a much more detailed, account. That, which was put to the media was more than enough to show that there was plenty of meat on the bones, which shows that, barring disaster, this would definitely be going ahead in 2009. This was, and is not, some far away whimsical fancy, which may or may not take place. '" Yet it clearly changed from 2005 to 2008 and had scope to do so because they told us this. They said it to us.
Quote The decision to go to 14 clubs was clearly made in 2005, as outlined by the Strategy For Super League document. The only proviso was that SL wouldn’t expand to 14 if they didn’t believe there was enough clubs who would have access to enough quality players in order to make them competitive. They had already stated, in the SFSL report, that the heartland clubs would not be able to provide this. That can only lead to one conclusion; they needed the new expansion clubs which, coincidently, they had already begun the process of setting up in 2004. '" So they didnt decide then did they you bloody idiot.
They made a plan to do so, knowing that they couldnt confirm it until 2008 when had time to prepare for it and check they were ready. They told us all this
Quote =Lewis also stressed that plans for expansion were unlikely to take place until the current television deal with BSkyB expires at the end of 2008.'"
Quote "If we don't believe it is sustainable and we don't believe that enough players will come through to give us 14 clubs, we won't do it," he added'"
Quote You have me over a barrel on this one, Smokey. I have had a brief scout across the net, but haven’t found it yet. As it means reading every Celtic Crusaders report over the last 18 months or so, I may not find it. I can’t be bothered doing that for the sake of a daft argument. By now, it may even have been removed from whatever website it was on. All I will say, is that what I have said is true. Obviously, you will not believe it. I will keep looking though.
However, I did find this link, while looking for the other, where LS states that:
"I was approached in 2004 to start up a club that was capable of getting into Super League by 2009," said Samuel.
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 134656.stm
This basically confirms that the RFL wanted them ready to be included in SL by 2009. Not 2007, 2010, 2012 or 2020, but by the year they had planned for SL expansion and licences a year later, in the 2005 report. '" You mean 5 years from then. Seems a reasonable amount of time doesnt it? what it would also mean is your claim just got a little crazier by moving from the SL/RFL consultation deciding this. To it all being decided before even that had happened
but as long as we keep filling the gaps with our imaginations it does all fit.
Quote Here’s the timeline. Coupled with Leighton Samuels admission that the Celtic Crusaders were being set up for the purpose of being placed in SL, even as early as 2004, shows there is something in what I am suggesting. So, it is safe to say that the the RFl had been thinking about the licence process, and whom they want to see in SL, as early as 2004.
2004: The RFL set up two new expansion clubs, telling at least one of them that they need to be capable of getting into Super league in 2009.
2005: they come up with the Strategy For Super league report, which states that “that the competition should be expanded to 14 clubs and said it was not felt the heartland would be able to sustain that number of Super League clubs.” . It also announces that Super League will now be a licenced franchise competition from 2009 onwards. This ties in nicely with the setting up of two new expansion clubs the year before.
2006: The SL clubs go through a dummy run of submitting licence bids, which would allow all parties to assess what is needed for 2008. This seems to be confirmation that the process is a rock solid policy of their intentions to go ahead with a full scale bid process in 2008.
2008: more details are given to the press, which leads to speculation that both the Celtic Crusaders and Les Catalans are both favourites to gain licences. Later on in the year, this is proven to be correct.
2009: the licence era begins as promised. The heartland did not take up all 14 places, and the two new clubs, set up in 2004 were both included.
Again, is it a coincidence that they had these two clubs approached and set up, just a year before announcing their plans in 2004, which states categorically that the heartland clubs could not fill the a 14 club SL?
If you think that this is a coincidence, and these clubs were never destined from the outset to receive a licence in 2009, as long as they were still in business, then I honestly see no further point in arguing with you. It looks as obvious as the nose on my face, to me.
No, they clearly felt in the 2005 SFSL report, and, undoubtedly, in 2004, when they decided they needed to set up two new expansion clubs that year to be ready for the 2008 licence process.
It Makes no difference at all how many years Les Catalans would have a non-relegation clause for. Whether it was for three or four is irrelevant. What matters, is they were approached to be set up, along with the Celtic Crusaders, a year before they released a document which stated they would be extending the league to 14, and that there weren’t enough quality heartland clubs to fill it. The main thing is that Les Catalans were given up until 2009 which took them up nicely to when they would be secure of a place forever. Whether that period started from 2005 or 2006 is irrelevant. My conclusions still stand.
The RFL didn’t decide on SL expansion to 14 in 2008, it was in 2005 when they announced it in the SFSL document and to the media. They stated, at the time (2005), that it would not begin until after 2008, when the current TV contract ends. That is not the same thing as you are saying.
Where did the RFL ‘explicitly’ tell us in 2005 that they hadn’t had an agreement in place, to begin the process of moving to a licence system with 14 clubs?
They must have had some sort of agreement in place with BskyB in order to begin this process, otherwise it would have been a very expansive waste of time, effort and money, over a 3 year period. I’ve no doubt that they would have had to thrash out the finer detail with them later on, but they must already have come to an initial agreement. RL is one of Sky Sports’ flagship sports and must be in constant touch with the RFL on any changes to the structure of the game, which may be taking place. It would be extremely naive to suggest that they wouldn’t. I would suggest that the whole idea of licencing and league expansion probably came about at a meeting between RFL and BskyB officials sometime in 2003-2004. '"
Thats a lovely story. It really is. It doesnt even class as a co-incidence though.
UTC was 'set up' and later renamed Les Catalans in 2001. not in 2004. Les Catalans were due to enter in 2005 not 2006, with an exemption that only took them to 2008 not 2009 and Les Catalans were given the go ahead to join in 2002, 3 years before the SL/RFL consultation and 2 full years before the year you have randomly decided they were set up and told to enter.
They also didnt decide until 2008 that they would expand to 14 teams, they told us that in 2005 that they wouldnt decide until 2008, and then again in 2008 that they had decided.
they told us this in 2005 [iLewis also confirmed that he would like to see Super League expand from 12 to 14 clubs in the future.
"We would like to expand - it's an ambition," he said.
"We believe that the heartland clubs are going to get stronger and stronger but we also think there are opportunities to expand in London, in south Wales and in France." [/i
in fact in the beginning of 2008 they still told us they hadnt decided news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 207735.stm [iBut RFL chief executive Nigel Wood told BBC Sport: "We would not move from 12 to 14 if the quality was compromised.
"Subject to standard, we will be moving to 14 but that is not carte blanche on accepting inferior applications."[/i
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 459782.stm
Quote
…Or, which is more likely in my opinion, they had decided that the heartlands wouldn’t be able to sustain 14 SL clubs and they needed a couple more expansion clubs, as early as 2004, when they went about setting them up. From then on, providing they were still around, both of these clubs would be licenced for 2009. It is probable, imo, that this made negotiations with people like Leighton Samuel and the LC officials easier, if they were promised a licence in 2009. There is no way LS would have bought into RL without that promise, imo. '" WHich is just plain wrong as the decision to admit Les Catalans (or UTC as it were then) was made in 2002 and explicitly proved wrong as they have stated [iBut RFL chief executive Nigel Wood told BBC Sport: "We would not move from 12 to 14 if the quality was compromised.
"Subject to standard, we will be moving to 14 but that is not carte blanche on accepting inferior applications."[/i which is exactly what i said and you have argued against.
Quote I’m not paranoid and I’m not making things up. I am commenting on what we know to have happened and on statements given to the press by those involved. I am clearly stating what I ‘m saying as merely being my opinion. As neither of us know the exact details of what went on, we can only use the timelines and history of events which took place, along with all the strange decisions made by the RFL, and draw our own conclusions. '" you are making things up, like that Les Catalans were set up in 2004, or the decision to expand was made in 2005. or which clubs where to be admitted was made in 2005, in fact pretty much all your nonsense.
Quote Correct!
Therefore, it’s not the best way to judge if a club is suitable for a 3 year licence in SL, as you are suggesting. If it was, all those clubs with potential like Paris, Celtic Crusaders, Gateshead and Fulham or the London Broncos would still be around in SL and thriving. They’re not though, are they?'" what a ridiculous argument. If Widnes dont have the potential to grow, Like crusaders do, like Les Catalans do, like Quins do, like Gateshead did, like Paris did, then they shouldnt be admitted to SL. If 2k crowds and a mid-table Championship side is all they have to offer then there isnt a place for them. After all we cant admit them on what they have the potential to do can we?
Quote This is because the RFL just looked at what they thought was their potential and threw them in at the deep end, while trying to pretend that they were as good as some of the best lower league clubs, when they clearly weren’t. '" except they didnt.
Quote I think the RFL need to take a broader look at the way they are trying to expand the game in non heartland areas. '" i think other vague things. Explain 'broader'?
Quote I did explain it, it’s just that you won’t accept that you are wrong. '" no you didnt, why has a Small town more potential than a small country? you explained why Widnes may be further on in developing their area but that is a different thing entirely.
Quote Then they are putting the cart before the horse.
To be fair, I think that the RFL wouldn’t have done this, if they intended to put the club in Wrxham in the first place. Because they were to go to South Wales, they did put in some amateur clubs in the area. '" Why? there has been welsh RL for the past 100 years, it was simply very small. putting an SL club there has given it a real shot in the arm and the growth has come from their visible presence.
Quote
Evidently, or they would have been in someone else’s academies and not at Widnes. '" so Widnes dont compete for youngsters, they just pick up the scraps?
Quote There is only so many places for young players, and there is only a finite number of places for each position available at those local SL clubs, yet there is an abundance of talent which will miss out. '" . if We need an SL club every 10 miles to make sure we pick the talent as a game we are fsking youth development very very badly.Quote This area, in particular, is not as saturated with RL clubs as it is in Yorkshire, and there is plenty of room for the three local clubs outside of their boundaries to find young talent and bring in more fans. '"
Yo wont find me arguing west yorkshire isnt overly saturated with SL clubs. But you talk to Cas and Wakey fans and they will blame their struggles on the bigger boys nicking their talent.
Quote There is also the question of how much effort the other SL clubs are willing to put into bringing through youngsters, particularly from outside there boundaries. If the other clubs don’t bother, then all potential goes to waste
Then there’s the quality of coaching and the support given to these youngsters as well as the infrastructure and environment in which they are learning. This is all top notch now at Widnes. They are trying new things too, with some of our young players being put in positions with NRL clubs and learning from the best youth coaches in the sport. We have already started this process, with Anthony Mullally now in the Brisbane Broncos youth set up.
There’s far more to than just how many people you have within a clubs boundaries. None of this suits you simplistic argument though.
'" you wont find me arguing with any of this. I agree, clubs need to do more. But im not sure why you think Crusaders cant also do these things, which will clearly benefit us more as they have a whole country to work with, whereas Widnes have a very small area and a fair few competitors.
Quote Yes, because they are the most local team and one which they are very aware of. Many people already come to watch Widnes from these areas, and as a percentage, I would bet it is more than any club in this area, except maybe St Helens. You only have to spen a short while on the TIW board to find out where many of the fans come from. Runcorn, Liverpool, West Cheshire and the The Wirral, even parts of Warrington and Wales!
This is before a concerted attempt to woo them begins in earnest. They’re already here and more of them will be coming shortly. This is a stated aim of Steve O’Connor. '" Then why arent we seeing it?
Quote
You apparently.
I’m not telling lies or making things up. I am putting over my point of view. I am stating what I think is has happened from the events which have actually taken place and the things which, those people in the know, have said. Unlike you, I am not willing to take the RFL’s word on everything they say.
If Richard Lewis was caught red handed humping a live chicken, and he said that he was merely checking for eggs, you’d believe him. '" and if the game had had success years of profit, growth, massive investment, and had won millions of pounds from the government to invest in grass roots, had a revitalised international game and had grown to having a presence in france, wales and london, had more people playing the game, you would still death ride the game and get any dig possible, try and highlight every negative simply because you cant accept Widnes were left behind, not by the RFL but by professionalism.
Quote
Did either the people who run the Scorpions or the people at Wrexham actually approach the RFL, or did the RFL approach them?'" the RFL approached Leighton Samuel, The scorpions approached the RFL.
Quote It is my contention that the RFL made enquiries with the people concerned, only in desperation and as it was clear that the Celtic Crusaders were heading for the rocks. I wish they had done it sooner rather than later. '" and you would be wrong. for a change.
|
|
Quote ="Pepe"OK, I’m sorry to everyone who is sick of this argument and I will make this my last comment on the matter. Smokey TA can blow smoke through is booty for the rest of this thread if he wants, but I’ll just ignore it, as we seem to be annoying people.
Christ, how much flesh do you want on those bones?
Do you think they would say all this, if it wasn’t actually decided that it would be done?
From the 2005 article:
On how many clubs they will expand to:'"
“The RFL also confirmed plans to expand Super League from 12 to 14 clubs.'" Which they immediately explained was dependent upon talks which were to happen in 2008. Then they confirmed these PLANS in 2008 having had the talks. Again, nothing set in stone as you have claimed.
you are 0 for 1
Quote On how long P&R would last for, until the licence era began and information about where the new clubs will come from. Presumably, these clubs would be the ones, which the RFL thought would take up the slack, which the heartlands could not supply.
“Promotion and relegation will remain in place for the next four seasons but then potential new clubs are likely to come from London, Wales or France” '" These are POTENTIAL clubs, who are LIKELY to come from these places. It certainly mentions nothing about anything been decided which is your main contention.
you are 0 for 2
Quote On how long each licence period will run and what teams will be judged on.
“Thereafter, the RFL will only consider admitting new teams on a three-yearly franchise system based on clubs' infrastructure, finance and results.”'" so different to the actual process, But you are saying it was set in stone? 0 for 3
Quote Names of the actual clubs, which will be setting up as pro RL clubs, with a view to being ready for 2009:
“Toulouse have expressed their desire to join Perpignan, who will join the elite division next February, and an application from a Welsh club to be based in Bridgend will be considered by the RFL Council in July.”'" So Toulouse want to, but HAVENT, and didnt. Bridgened will be CONSIDERED
0 for 4
Quote On the chances of ambitious lower league clubs still being able to reach Super League, with the hint that it will not be a closed shop:
“But executive chairman Richard Lewis insists ambitious non-Super League clubs will still be able to reach the top and says the National League clubs have given their backing to the blueprint.”'" Doesnt mention anything about the process so is a little irrelevant, but are you really arguing that the RFL speaking to and getting back from the lower leagues is evidence of their lack of transparency
Quote On when preliminary assessments for SL clubs will take place:
“He added that all 12 Super League clubs will undergo an assessment in 2006”'" And?
0 for 5
Quote On how it will affect SL fixtures:
“The increase in the number of teams will lead to a reduction in Super League fixtures, since it will remove the need for additional games and enable clubs to play each other home and away.”'"
Quote …And there’s more that I could have put up, and that is just from that 2005 article!'" well you should have done, because nothing in their is evidence of anything been decided. Which is your main argument.
Quote I would suggest that the 2005 strategy document for Super League report would probably contain a much more detailed, account. That, which was put to the media was more than enough to show that there was plenty of meat on the bones, which shows that, barring disaster, this would definitely be going ahead in 2009. This was, and is not, some far away whimsical fancy, which may or may not take place. '" Yet it clearly changed from 2005 to 2008 and had scope to do so because they told us this. They said it to us.
Quote The decision to go to 14 clubs was clearly made in 2005, as outlined by the Strategy For Super League document. The only proviso was that SL wouldn’t expand to 14 if they didn’t believe there was enough clubs who would have access to enough quality players in order to make them competitive. They had already stated, in the SFSL report, that the heartland clubs would not be able to provide this. That can only lead to one conclusion; they needed the new expansion clubs which, coincidently, they had already begun the process of setting up in 2004. '" So they didnt decide then did they you bloody idiot.
They made a plan to do so, knowing that they couldnt confirm it until 2008 when had time to prepare for it and check they were ready. They told us all this
Quote =Lewis also stressed that plans for expansion were unlikely to take place until the current television deal with BSkyB expires at the end of 2008.'"
Quote "If we don't believe it is sustainable and we don't believe that enough players will come through to give us 14 clubs, we won't do it," he added'"
Quote You have me over a barrel on this one, Smokey. I have had a brief scout across the net, but haven’t found it yet. As it means reading every Celtic Crusaders report over the last 18 months or so, I may not find it. I can’t be bothered doing that for the sake of a daft argument. By now, it may even have been removed from whatever website it was on. All I will say, is that what I have said is true. Obviously, you will not believe it. I will keep looking though.
However, I did find this link, while looking for the other, where LS states that:
"I was approached in 2004 to start up a club that was capable of getting into Super League by 2009," said Samuel.
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 134656.stm
This basically confirms that the RFL wanted them ready to be included in SL by 2009. Not 2007, 2010, 2012 or 2020, but by the year they had planned for SL expansion and licences a year later, in the 2005 report. '" You mean 5 years from then. Seems a reasonable amount of time doesnt it? what it would also mean is your claim just got a little crazier by moving from the SL/RFL consultation deciding this. To it all being decided before even that had happened
but as long as we keep filling the gaps with our imaginations it does all fit.
Quote Here’s the timeline. Coupled with Leighton Samuels admission that the Celtic Crusaders were being set up for the purpose of being placed in SL, even as early as 2004, shows there is something in what I am suggesting. So, it is safe to say that the the RFl had been thinking about the licence process, and whom they want to see in SL, as early as 2004.
2004: The RFL set up two new expansion clubs, telling at least one of them that they need to be capable of getting into Super league in 2009.
2005: they come up with the Strategy For Super league report, which states that “that the competition should be expanded to 14 clubs and said it was not felt the heartland would be able to sustain that number of Super League clubs.” . It also announces that Super League will now be a licenced franchise competition from 2009 onwards. This ties in nicely with the setting up of two new expansion clubs the year before.
2006: The SL clubs go through a dummy run of submitting licence bids, which would allow all parties to assess what is needed for 2008. This seems to be confirmation that the process is a rock solid policy of their intentions to go ahead with a full scale bid process in 2008.
2008: more details are given to the press, which leads to speculation that both the Celtic Crusaders and Les Catalans are both favourites to gain licences. Later on in the year, this is proven to be correct.
2009: the licence era begins as promised. The heartland did not take up all 14 places, and the two new clubs, set up in 2004 were both included.
Again, is it a coincidence that they had these two clubs approached and set up, just a year before announcing their plans in 2004, which states categorically that the heartland clubs could not fill the a 14 club SL?
If you think that this is a coincidence, and these clubs were never destined from the outset to receive a licence in 2009, as long as they were still in business, then I honestly see no further point in arguing with you. It looks as obvious as the nose on my face, to me.
No, they clearly felt in the 2005 SFSL report, and, undoubtedly, in 2004, when they decided they needed to set up two new expansion clubs that year to be ready for the 2008 licence process.
It Makes no difference at all how many years Les Catalans would have a non-relegation clause for. Whether it was for three or four is irrelevant. What matters, is they were approached to be set up, along with the Celtic Crusaders, a year before they released a document which stated they would be extending the league to 14, and that there weren’t enough quality heartland clubs to fill it. The main thing is that Les Catalans were given up until 2009 which took them up nicely to when they would be secure of a place forever. Whether that period started from 2005 or 2006 is irrelevant. My conclusions still stand.
The RFL didn’t decide on SL expansion to 14 in 2008, it was in 2005 when they announced it in the SFSL document and to the media. They stated, at the time (2005), that it would not begin until after 2008, when the current TV contract ends. That is not the same thing as you are saying.
Where did the RFL ‘explicitly’ tell us in 2005 that they hadn’t had an agreement in place, to begin the process of moving to a licence system with 14 clubs?
They must have had some sort of agreement in place with BskyB in order to begin this process, otherwise it would have been a very expansive waste of time, effort and money, over a 3 year period. I’ve no doubt that they would have had to thrash out the finer detail with them later on, but they must already have come to an initial agreement. RL is one of Sky Sports’ flagship sports and must be in constant touch with the RFL on any changes to the structure of the game, which may be taking place. It would be extremely naive to suggest that they wouldn’t. I would suggest that the whole idea of licencing and league expansion probably came about at a meeting between RFL and BskyB officials sometime in 2003-2004. '"
Thats a lovely story. It really is. It doesnt even class as a co-incidence though.
UTC was 'set up' and later renamed Les Catalans in 2001. not in 2004. Les Catalans were due to enter in 2005 not 2006, with an exemption that only took them to 2008 not 2009 and Les Catalans were given the go ahead to join in 2002, 3 years before the SL/RFL consultation and 2 full years before the year you have randomly decided they were set up and told to enter.
They also didnt decide until 2008 that they would expand to 14 teams, they told us that in 2005 that they wouldnt decide until 2008, and then again in 2008 that they had decided.
they told us this in 2005 [iLewis also confirmed that he would like to see Super League expand from 12 to 14 clubs in the future.
"We would like to expand - it's an ambition," he said.
"We believe that the heartland clubs are going to get stronger and stronger but we also think there are opportunities to expand in London, in south Wales and in France." [/i
in fact in the beginning of 2008 they still told us they hadnt decided news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 207735.stm [iBut RFL chief executive Nigel Wood told BBC Sport: "We would not move from 12 to 14 if the quality was compromised.
"Subject to standard, we will be moving to 14 but that is not carte blanche on accepting inferior applications."[/i
news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 459782.stm
Quote
…Or, which is more likely in my opinion, they had decided that the heartlands wouldn’t be able to sustain 14 SL clubs and they needed a couple more expansion clubs, as early as 2004, when they went about setting them up. From then on, providing they were still around, both of these clubs would be licenced for 2009. It is probable, imo, that this made negotiations with people like Leighton Samuel and the LC officials easier, if they were promised a licence in 2009. There is no way LS would have bought into RL without that promise, imo. '" WHich is just plain wrong as the decision to admit Les Catalans (or UTC as it were then) was made in 2002 and explicitly proved wrong as they have stated [iBut RFL chief executive Nigel Wood told BBC Sport: "We would not move from 12 to 14 if the quality was compromised.
"Subject to standard, we will be moving to 14 but that is not carte blanche on accepting inferior applications."[/i which is exactly what i said and you have argued against.
Quote I’m not paranoid and I’m not making things up. I am commenting on what we know to have happened and on statements given to the press by those involved. I am clearly stating what I ‘m saying as merely being my opinion. As neither of us know the exact details of what went on, we can only use the timelines and history of events which took place, along with all the strange decisions made by the RFL, and draw our own conclusions. '" you are making things up, like that Les Catalans were set up in 2004, or the decision to expand was made in 2005. or which clubs where to be admitted was made in 2005, in fact pretty much all your nonsense.
Quote Correct!
Therefore, it’s not the best way to judge if a club is suitable for a 3 year licence in SL, as you are suggesting. If it was, all those clubs with potential like Paris, Celtic Crusaders, Gateshead and Fulham or the London Broncos would still be around in SL and thriving. They’re not though, are they?'" what a ridiculous argument. If Widnes dont have the potential to grow, Like crusaders do, like Les Catalans do, like Quins do, like Gateshead did, like Paris did, then they shouldnt be admitted to SL. If 2k crowds and a mid-table Championship side is all they have to offer then there isnt a place for them. After all we cant admit them on what they have the potential to do can we?
Quote This is because the RFL just looked at what they thought was their potential and threw them in at the deep end, while trying to pretend that they were as good as some of the best lower league clubs, when they clearly weren’t. '" except they didnt.
Quote I think the RFL need to take a broader look at the way they are trying to expand the game in non heartland areas. '" i think other vague things. Explain 'broader'?
Quote I did explain it, it’s just that you won’t accept that you are wrong. '" no you didnt, why has a Small town more potential than a small country? you explained why Widnes may be further on in developing their area but that is a different thing entirely.
Quote Then they are putting the cart before the horse.
To be fair, I think that the RFL wouldn’t have done this, if they intended to put the club in Wrxham in the first place. Because they were to go to South Wales, they did put in some amateur clubs in the area. '" Why? there has been welsh RL for the past 100 years, it was simply very small. putting an SL club there has given it a real shot in the arm and the growth has come from their visible presence.
Quote
Evidently, or they would have been in someone else’s academies and not at Widnes. '" so Widnes dont compete for youngsters, they just pick up the scraps?
Quote There is only so many places for young players, and there is only a finite number of places for each position available at those local SL clubs, yet there is an abundance of talent which will miss out. '" . if We need an SL club every 10 miles to make sure we pick the talent as a game we are fsking youth development very very badly.Quote This area, in particular, is not as saturated with RL clubs as it is in Yorkshire, and there is plenty of room for the three local clubs outside of their boundaries to find young talent and bring in more fans. '"
Yo wont find me arguing west yorkshire isnt overly saturated with SL clubs. But you talk to Cas and Wakey fans and they will blame their struggles on the bigger boys nicking their talent.
Quote There is also the question of how much effort the other SL clubs are willing to put into bringing through youngsters, particularly from outside there boundaries. If the other clubs don’t bother, then all potential goes to waste
Then there’s the quality of coaching and the support given to these youngsters as well as the infrastructure and environment in which they are learning. This is all top notch now at Widnes. They are trying new things too, with some of our young players being put in positions with NRL clubs and learning from the best youth coaches in the sport. We have already started this process, with Anthony Mullally now in the Brisbane Broncos youth set up.
There’s far more to than just how many people you have within a clubs boundaries. None of this suits you simplistic argument though.
'" you wont find me arguing with any of this. I agree, clubs need to do more. But im not sure why you think Crusaders cant also do these things, which will clearly benefit us more as they have a whole country to work with, whereas Widnes have a very small area and a fair few competitors.
Quote Yes, because they are the most local team and one which they are very aware of. Many people already come to watch Widnes from these areas, and as a percentage, I would bet it is more than any club in this area, except maybe St Helens. You only have to spen a short while on the TIW board to find out where many of the fans come from. Runcorn, Liverpool, West Cheshire and the The Wirral, even parts of Warrington and Wales!
This is before a concerted attempt to woo them begins in earnest. They’re already here and more of them will be coming shortly. This is a stated aim of Steve O’Connor. '" Then why arent we seeing it?
Quote
You apparently.
I’m not telling lies or making things up. I am putting over my point of view. I am stating what I think is has happened from the events which have actually taken place and the things which, those people in the know, have said. Unlike you, I am not willing to take the RFL’s word on everything they say.
If Richard Lewis was caught red handed humping a live chicken, and he said that he was merely checking for eggs, you’d believe him. '" and if the game had had success years of profit, growth, massive investment, and had won millions of pounds from the government to invest in grass roots, had a revitalised international game and had grown to having a presence in france, wales and london, had more people playing the game, you would still death ride the game and get any dig possible, try and highlight every negative simply because you cant accept Widnes were left behind, not by the RFL but by professionalism.
Quote
Did either the people who run the Scorpions or the people at Wrexham actually approach the RFL, or did the RFL approach them?'" the RFL approached Leighton Samuel, The scorpions approached the RFL.
Quote It is my contention that the RFL made enquiries with the people concerned, only in desperation and as it was clear that the Celtic Crusaders were heading for the rocks. I wish they had done it sooner rather than later. '" and you would be wrong. for a change.
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1869 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2018 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd like to say something on this - there seems to be a big battle on this forum, there is the 'anti-expansionist' who say that the whole of Rugby League can happily survive on a small stretch of land in the middle of the UK, and two Aussie States. Now, that's fine, my teams in that little stretch, and It'd be easier to get to, it wouldn't effect me in the slightest.
There's a second camp - the 'expansionist' who don't want the RFL to expand at a fast pace that'll kill the game, but would like to see a bit of slack cut to the teams outside of the stretch in the North. To be fair to them, Crusaders have done well on the field, and have paved the way for Wales to do well in the European Cup, which we are all happy about (I'm sure).
A lot of the problems Rugby League has seem to be created, and talked up. A lot of fans, me included, seem to be paranoid about things, and a lot of us seem to talk up problems, and if you look at it - they aren't there. We're a league in it's 15th year. Rugby League almost died because of expansionism in Australia, and that was because the Australia equivalent of flat-cappers refused to see the reasons to expanding and changing for the good of Rugby League, and although there was other things behind it, it was the main problem that just so happened to be inclusive with greed and the wanting of people to violate rights, and resign etc, etc, I never understood it (mainly cause I was about 5 at the time) when it happened - but it was a mess that caused Rugby League to die on its ass for 5 years. We don't want that to happen here, especially as we're in a fragile state at the moment.
Realistically, we need to look at the Bradley Report as a guide, we can't have seven teams from Yorkshire, probably five is enough, but who to refuse entry to is tough. We have a few contenders, Wakefield have added little to the competition, Castleford I like, but realistically could go, but also would be good to keep in that area due to the lack of football teams in Wakefield MDC.
In Lancashire, we can support a fifth team, Widnes is the obvious choice, they have the ground, the academy and the support to do it. So, we should realistically have five teams from Lancashire, 5 teams from Yorkshire, and 4 Expansion Teams.
We Currently have Crusaders, Catalans and London, the choice most would go for is Toulouse, but I would suggest a second London team perhaps, because if marketed well enough, could give London a little more character as a Footy club, with a rival someone to hate. Even a club from Nottingham or Darlington could be mooted, but this would take time, so would be an option probably be Toulouse or London. This would give us five yorkshire, five lancashire, two in france, and one from london and wales. It's expanding the game slowly, but realistically and in which the balance is restored.
Looking below the Super League, I would look for a separation of the RFL and Super League, not in an aggressive fashion, but in a co-operative fashion so that the RFL can concentrate on running the game in England, and the Co-Operative Championship should concentrate on developing players, and the RFL should work with both Super League and the Championship, to improve the standard of the grounds, the players and coaching staff, and should concentrate on running the game at that level, while also expanding the international game.
I would also look for an incentive of University Teams, to provide a belt of players at a reasonable standard, perhaps seeing Championship Clubs pairing with local University's to provide coaching, with incentives by the RFL. With this, we should see about 6/7 clubs (including those who were relegated) becoming dominant. When this occurs. I would promote those clubs to the League, and split the Super League into two divisions of ten. This would reduce fixtures, lead to less of a split between top/bottom clubs, and give promotion and return promotion and relegation. It'd lead to more marquee games that could be sold for a higher price to potential tv dealer.
It's a long term vision, 10-12 years, but it would be beneficial to the game in the long term.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1869 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2018 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| So, here was my Super League for those who didn't realise.
Leeds
Bradford
Hull
Hull KR
Huddersfield
Warrington
St Helens
Wigan
Salford
Widnes
Toulouse
Catalans
Harlequins
Crusaders
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Conorgiantsfan"I'd like to say something on this - there seems to be a big battle on this forum,=#FF0000 there is the 'anti-expansionist' who say that the whole of Rugby League can happily survive on a small stretch of land in the middle of the UK, and two Aussie States. Now, that's fine, my teams in that little stretch, and It'd be easier to get to, it wouldn't effect me in the slightest.
There's a second camp - =#FF0000the 'expansionist' who don't want the RFL to expand at a fast pace that'll kill the game, but would like to see a bit of slack cut to the teams outside of the stretch in the North. To be fair to them, Crusaders have done well on the field, and have paved the way for Wales to do well in the European Cup, which we are all happy about (I'm sure).
.'"
So which am I ?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1869 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2018 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I wouldn't like to say
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Conorgiantsfan"
Looking below the Super League, I would look for a separation of the RFL and Super League, not in an aggressive fashion, but in a co-operative fashion so that the RFL can concentrate on running the game in England, and =#FF0000:vhh05glnthe Co-Operative Championship should concentrate on developing players
For who ? , and why ?
| | |
| |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|