First time Jamie Peacock has been charged and up at a disciplinary, over his Super League career www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search Justin Carney meanwhile has been charged 5 times www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search But let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.

First time Jamie Peacock has been charged and up at a disciplinary, over his Super League career www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search Justin Carney meanwhile has been charged 5 times www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search But let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.

Quote ="LeedsDave"First time Jamie Peacock has been charged and up at a disciplinary, over his Super League career www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search Justin Carney meanwhile has been charged 5 times www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search But let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.'" As I said above...... If you had a conviction for GBH, would you be expected to stand there and get your face smashed in if somebody attacked you ???

Quote ="LeedsDave"First time Jamie Peacock has been charged and up at a disciplinary, over his Super League career www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search Justin Carney meanwhile has been charged 5 times www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search But let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.'" As I said above...... If you had a conviction for GBH, would you be expected to stand there and get your face smashed in if somebody attacked you ???

And as a Widnes and England/GB fan i'm sure you were cheering JP on, on all 3 occasions

You are missing the point by quite a wide margin.

Using your GBH example, if you had a conviction for GBH and had 5 times been up in court for GBH would you expect a harsher sentence than someone who has never been up for GBH and never been done for it?

I fail to see how that's relevant? In sport and in society, repeat offenders are treated more harshly than first time offenders.



Really? I'd argue it had the opposite effect. Peacock returned to the field and made two clean breaks, one of which led to a try.

Quote ="LeedsDave"First time Jamie Peacock has been charged and up at a disciplinary, over his Super League career www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search Justin Carney meanwhile has been charged 5 times www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search But let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.'" First time Paddy Flynn was charged and up at a disciplinary, for the scrap with Carney, two game ban, so you can't really use a 'first offence leniency' as an excuse. Lets let the facts help to prove a conspiracy.

Quote ="LeedsDave"First time Jamie Peacock has been charged and up at a disciplinary, over his Super League career www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search Justin Carney meanwhile has been charged 5 times www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/discipl ... rch=search But let's not let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.'" First time Paddy Flynn was charged and up at a disciplinary, for the scrap with Carney, two game ban, so you can't really use a 'first offence leniency' as an excuse. Lets let the facts help to prove a conspiracy.

But the poster before said Carney was provoked, ergo it was Paddy Flynn who 'started it' this probably why he got banned.

Every case should be looked at on its own merits.

The facts are, peacock was hit with a swinging arm and an aggressive use of the head whilst on the floor, h e got up and swung a few, unfortunately for Matt Sarsfield Peacock is fairly handy and copped a good right hander.

Sin binning sufficient was easily the correct decision.

The Carney/Flynn scrap is shown on the SLTV highlights of the game, no worse than Peacock hitting two separate players when 'provoked'.

And both players were given the same initial charge - perhaps Flynn had a case to argue also?

Instead he took an early guilty plea. We'll never know.

What I find a touch bazare is according to the RFL disciplinary board, you punch someone, and can receive a £300 fine....break someone's jaw and get a 3 match ban,... but utter a childish insult that offends the PC Brigade and receive a 5 match lay off.

I should imagine that in all dressing rooms this week, the final advice of the Coach will be...."Keep it zipped, and let your fists do the talking!"

Call somebody a name 5 matches, punch somebody 2 matches.

Correction

so i see, the world's gone mad.

indeed, only a big club like leeds or Wigan would be given special dispensation to employ more overseas players, only a big club like Leeds or Wigan would be given another special dispensation to de-register then re-register overseas players to fit more in.....................oh that was HKR

Only a big club would get away with fielding an illegible player in the CC............oh that was hull fc.

Only a big club would receive a smaller punishment for breaking the SC because they went bust and didnt actually pay the money they promised...........oh that was Wakefield.

I think you'll find there was no special dispensation and it is allowed under the current rules. Other than that you are correct.

Quote ="LifeLongHKRFan"I think you'll find there was no special dispensation and it is allowed under the current rules. Other than that you are correct.'" you are wrong. [iRovers were allowed 'special dispensation' earlier this season to remove the then injured Dobson off their register to bring in Mason. It allowed them to effectively rotate an overseas quota position in their squad between the two players. However, RFL rules say that players who are de-registered should not be allowed to play for the same club again that season. [/i Read more: www.hulldailymail.co.uk/HULL-KR- ... z34Kmn4h4O

Quote ="LifeLongHKRFan"I think you'll find there was no special dispensation and it is allowed under the current rules. Other than that you are correct.'" you are wrong. [iRovers were allowed 'special dispensation' earlier this season to remove the then injured Dobson off their register to bring in Mason. It allowed them to effectively rotate an overseas quota position in their squad between the two players. However, RFL rules say that players who are de-registered should not be allowed to play for the same club again that season. [/i Read more: www.hulldailymail.co.uk/HULL-KR- ... z34Kmn4h4O

Quote ="SmokeyTA"you are wrong. [iRovers were allowed 'special dispensation' earlier this season to remove the then injured Dobson off their register to bring in Mason. It allowed them to effectively rotate an overseas quota position in their squad between the two players. However, RFL rules say that players who are de-registered should not be allowed to play for the same club again that season. [/i Read more: www.hulldailymail.co.uk/HULL-KR- ... z34Kmn4h4O'" My apologies. As you were

Quote ="SmokeyTA"you are wrong. [iRovers were allowed 'special dispensation' earlier this season to remove the then injured Dobson off their register to bring in Mason. It allowed them to effectively rotate an overseas quota position in their squad between the two players. However, RFL rules say that players who are de-registered should not be allowed to play for the same club again that season. [/i Read more: www.hulldailymail.co.uk/HULL-KR- ... z34Kmn4h4O'" My apologies. As you were

I agree.

Next we'll be having players running up to the teacher, sorry the ref and saying ....."Sir, did you hear what he just said?".

Or maybe it will be "keep you mouth shut, your fists down and act like the well paid professional sportsman the game expects you to be"?

What's the difference between watching RL and a Disney film?

JB Down Under: I don't know.

-----------------

I'm sure a pro RL coach has told his team to keep their mouths shut and their fists down. But he couldn't keep a straight face while he said it. And then he told his players to crush their opponents into the ground.

''Bunch of slack jawed faggots up in here''

Jesse ventura, Predator.

That will get you a 5 match ban !

"just get out of here Kaffir-lover"

Joss Ackland, Lethal Weapon 2

Against leeds in last seasons playoffs, briers smacked ablett from behind with no provocation and got no ban. The idea that it always favours leeds is wrong.

But that won't stop the clueless f*cks beefing about it, and btw, you hudds fans are the worst mothers out there for this rubbish.

Here here. Any excuse to attack players rather than praising them for showing back bone and fighting back. The fact Briers got off was shocking, but that's old ground.
Did JP deserve a ban? No? Similary, did Carney the other week? No he was defending him self also!