The ball was short but it wasn't lost. He still had his hand round it. Would have just been play on. Theres a decent chance he would have lost it getting back to his feet cause it wasn't a particularly good grip he had, but Quinlan took that chance away from him.
In my opinion the most clear cut decision of the 3, but still maybe slightly harsh to get a yellow for it.

dboy there's nothing wrong with having different opinions that's what this forum is for, I genuinely believe there was intent you clearly disagree, personally I'm not fussed either way I just voiced my opinion for what it was worth and I'm not prepared to get involved further, the review panel will sort it one way or tuther, but please don't lower yourself to the standards of some on here with the inference that I maybe on drugs, your much better than that.

Firstly well done Rovers had heart and desire something we used to have and lost it once the incompetent Marshall and Orr rocked into town.

We had some good momentum early on and the outright bent Kendall "yeah I said it bent Kendall" changed that with one of his normal crooked decisions something he does every game. we're sh*te under Marshall needs to go now, but with around a dozen out "injured or whatever" and no confidence the last thing we need is that crook. I'm close to done with this sport.

Just seen this, looks a cynical late hit with the shoulder no or little attempt at a real tackle, 4 match for that RFL set a president early in the season with Tetavano. Consistency is what we want.

I suggest you look again as you're either blind or you've had too much sun today



4 game ban my 'arris. Behave yourself. But the RFL have plenty of previous of giving Salford players ridiculously harsh bans so probably 8 games.

And no it wasn't shoulder, it was a chest on hit.

No the Tetevano one was much worse, late (later I think) and with contact to the head. IMO this one should be sending off sufficient, maybe one match.

So if the panel give him four matches it will because they have plenty of previous by giving ridiculously harsh bans and nothing to do with the intentional assault on the player, there's only one person with the sun in his eyes here fella, chest on hit

Def Red, should get 4-6 games as a real whiplash threat

I didnt think it was a red, he'd already started in on the tackle before he went to pass the ball.

We might as well red shirt play makers now, they're getting protected species like goal keepers

There are either some complete WUM's on here or excessive lockdown masturbation has seriously impacted the eyesight of a number of forumites.

We'll have to take your word on the latter as you appear to be the expert.

I am not joking but these guys have now made James Child into the best ref in the league followed by Liam Moore .

Why not just admit it. At the moment there are no top notch ref's. Watch NRL if you want to see a decent ref. I think the players challenge they have down there is an Aussie rule we could bring in here instead of some of the stupid ones we have.

Oh. My apologies.

I understood your user name to be a drugs reference!

I shall edit that post.

Decent refs in the NRL? Go watch the Kobe Hetherington sending off this weekend and tell me they have decent refs. By far the worst sending off I have ever seen

Not any more thanks to the Mods







whatever it was in whatever guises it's gone from here, and is infecting somewhere else....

So you found one bad decision from the NRL games this week, hardly compares with the number Kendall made in this one game. As I was saying with the Captains challenge they can question a decision in the NRL, and in most cases it usually proves the ref correct.

How did Pauli get on with his sending off ?

No further action

I think you will find that the captains challenge has been 50% successful this year so the ref was wrong 50% of the time. Thats not "usually proves the ref correct" now is it?

As I only watch the televised games in the UK I couldn't comment on the total actual percentage only on a perception of the games I actually watch. Are you stating the percentage that was given after 32 games this season.
Guess we'll never agree.

I’m stating the 50% that the official NRL stats page gives.

But feel free to keep digging a hole rather than admit you were wrong

So far you came up with 1 bad decision in a weekend of NRL games, when as I said this thread already highlights more than that in one game here.

Nothing in any of that seems to make me wrong.

Referee performance is on the whole subjective, you seem to think it is better in Superleague, I think it's better in NRL, end of subject.