Right, so Lees is meant to predict that Roberts is going to fall in a split second? And there’s nothing reckless about it, he goes to make the tackle and Roberts’ head catches Lees’ knee.

If anyone’s getting a ban it’s Mike Cooper for that shoulder charge on Bentley. Warrington were a joke yesterday with cheap, late hits. Goodwin, Patton and Westwood all guilty of that. Have to laugh at Kevin Brown running 20 yards to shove Richardson. Pathetic really, wouldn’t see him doing that to any of the big lads.

On the game itself, Warrington are a poor side and have no idea with the ball against any good defence. The only side out of the top 4 who have no chance of winning the Grand Final.

Roberts is knocked out on the floor. Lees is lay on top of Roberts. Brainboxes Westwood and Hill decide it'd be a good idea to start a scrap over a bloke who's just been whacked in the head.

Smart pair.

It's ridiculous just how biased towards Dire Eddie Hemmings is.

And when Warrington are losing he always has plenty of excuses up his sleeve for them.

I thought Eddie supports Widnes?

I've lost count of the number of sad fecks obsessed with the various teams who Eddie supposedly supports.

Its taken a while, but gradually you're getting there. Roberts was knocked out and he was whacked in the head and Lees was on the scene. All you need to do now is to put those three clues together...

No charges from the game. Ridiculous really, Cooper should have been banned for a clear shoulder charge.

You haven't got a clue have you?

What really needs addressing is how Wells is allowed to preach his nonsense ons Sky aimed entirely at getting a player from one of Cas's rivals banned. When Phil Clark of all people has to pull you up about the inconsistency of your 'expert' opinion you know somethings wrong.

I think Warrington have failed on all fronts, there were 4 attempts to injure Richardson in the game on Saturday, so for Lees to be innocent is a bit of justice.

50% correct. Must try harder.

I'd love to see the maths behind that statement. With that kind of logic you'd be a shoe in for the Disciplinary panel. If Lees is innocent does that mean the referee was wrong to yellow card him?

I think the question would be, if the Lees incident was worthy of a penalty and yellow card, then why wasn't Peyroux sin-binned in the second half? Or why was O Loughlin sin-binned for a similar incident is the St Helens vs Wigan game last month?

The only difference was that Lees ran in to the collision, which is not an offence nor is reckless in my view.

For what it's worth, I don't think any of the incidents referred to above were worthy of yellow cards.

Would have been a red card if Jon Wells was in charge of the game. I assume the ref being inexperienced wanted to take the heat out of the game.

Hopefully Lees will put a big hit on Roberts early in the semi final game, that would really blow Hill,s gasket.