He's been found guilty.

www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6488427893

www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6488427893

Banned for 12 matches.

Why didn't he just show them some of the threads on here?

Indeed, he (like some on here it seems) could have pleaded insanity. Right decision, right length of ban, move on.

A bit of a sham of a 'hearing' to be honest. He was judged even before the hearing had been done. The NRL's involvement in it has been a joke, lobbying the committee to ban him for longer than the longest possible ban is a joke, let the hearing decide his guilt surely?

He was re-graded on Tuesday, the ban could of been anything, upto the discretion of the panel!
Greenberg (Doggies CEO) seemed happy enough with the process and he was there!!

If England get to the final of the series will that knock another game off and be down to only miss 7 games in the NRL? If so not bad at all for a nice nibble of an ear

nah mate, was stipulated 2 internationals and 2 friendlies!

Looking at the pic that was in one of the Aussie Papers of Slaters ear how they can determine thats a bit mark is anyones guess it looks like a scratch nothing more.

If his ear had have been bitten then surely his ear would be marked around the edge of the ear on the helix more than just the tiny scratch inside on the anntihelix unless James Graham has a perculiar jaw action with one tooth thats much longer than his others.

This reminds me of an incident in the latter part of the 2010 season here in Oz in NSW Cup. www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5913053707 Just wondering if Slater felt the same thing?

This reminds me of an incident in the latter part of the 2010 season here in Oz in NSW Cup. www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5913053707 Just wondering if Slater felt the same thing?

More detailed report of the proceedings now up [url=http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/graham-judiciary/story-e6frfgbo-1226488427893 here[/url

12 weeks was not nearly long enough. Should have been a life ban. A disgusting act.

[url=http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/im-a-lover-not-a-biter-defiant-graham-maintains-innocence-20121004-271tw.htmlJammer is maintaining his innocence[/url

Clearly I have.

So despite the evidence presented against him biting (whilst the only evidence for him biting, was the inconclusive video clip) they've found him guilty.

And given him a longer ban than a player who definately had a chomp.

What a joke.

Looks like they have retained the same systems we used in the 18th century on them.

Yep. They had their minds made up before Graham even turned up.

Unbelievable stuff. So there is no evidence that there was a bite, medical evidence against it being a bite mark and supporting my theory that it was a nail injury. Yet they still find him guilty in less than 10 minutes and decide to go beyond the regulations and ban him for longer than the maximum ban.

I hope Slater gets what is owed to him next season. I should imagine there will be 17 Canterbury players out to hurt him properly next season. He's scum, this for me is a false allegation designed to get a player sent off in a Grand Final.

Clearly yet another trolling post from this contributor.

Why would there be '17 Canterbury players out to hurt him properly next season'?

The video evidence was as clear as day. Even the most blinkered Canterbury Bankstown Bulldogs supporter knows that Graham is guilty of a despicable act upon a fellow professional.

Quite a clever move by the Bulldogs staff to get Graham to go not out on this one though. In the highly unlikely event he was found innocent (which upon looking at the evidence was virtually nil) its a victory for the Bulldogs. Now they can claim an 'innocent' man has been convicted of this act they can use it to reinforce the 'no one likes us' mentality that the side and their predominantly Lebanese supporter base try and promote.

As an interchange player Graham was ultimately worth sacrificing.

You make it sound like he raped someone.

Nobody other than Jammer and Slater knows whether he is guilty of anything. However, people the world over like to join in with lynch mobs.

Personally, I believe he's innocent of the charge. I think he had been convicted even before he got there. Stinks rotten.

Oh dear...

Whatever, just because a concocted sham of a hearing that determined his guilt before any evidence had being presented means jack. Anyone with a couple of brain cells can see Slater was never bitten but go knock one out on your immoral victory. Your original comments are still distasteful..scum, not nice is it??