Boom! Boom! www.loverugbyleague.com/news_553 ... ition.html

Boom! Boom! www.loverugbyleague.com/news_553 ... ition.html

That link's not working.

Try here: [url=http://loverugbyleague.com/news_5539-rugby-league-secures-commonwealth-games-recognition.htmlRugby League secures Commonwealth Games recognition.[/url

Great news if this goes anywhere.

If not, we should be fighting to get RL players in the RU 7s tournaments. RU 7s frustrates the hell out of me - the basics of draw & pass, running lines, etc seems to have passed RU by. Can you imagine players like Sam Tomkins?? They'd take it by storm.

Sorry, might be down to the fact I'm on my phone.
Thanks for good link.

Great news for International RL.

Terrific news!

Is 2014 in Glasgow too soon for RL to be played? Imagine if it is played and a fair few folk turn out to support it and then Gold Coast hold the games in 2018.

The last thing I want is our players showcasing their stuff in front of various rugby unions and wealthy union backers. Apart from that sevens is a horrible freak show of a 'sport'. It offers absolutely nothing and as you alluded to it's no more than gloryfied tag.
If rugby league does eventually make it into the games would you prefer to see thirteen a side or nines?

Probably 9s. We want it to be an exhibition as much as a RL competition and 9s allows for more space and fluidity, more room to showcase a player's skills - and of course more try scoring opportunities.

Something like 15 mins each way, drop goals for conversions, 3-man scrums, 4 subs...

I don't think I'd change the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugby_league_nines#Lawscurrent rules[/url as having seen nines tournaments in the past I think they work just fine.
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rugby_league_nines#Buderus_blueprintDanny Buderus came up with some ideas that are worth at least discussing.[/url

Hadn't seen that before - all seems good to me. 5-man scrums free up more space and provide a different dynamic to the game.

Used to be 50 nations. Rugby league has that many.

Should be given strong consideration. Biggest sport on the Gold Coast.

RL didn't have 50 Commonwealth nations does it?

Didn't have to be once. Not sure what the current criteria are.

odd, given that they are on this thread.

This sounds weird, but 9's is better because there's less people in the team... If you want to get your developing nations involved its going to be easier for them to put a 9's squad together. In a country with little or no experience of RL it's easier and you're more guaranteed to find 13 or 14 quality players than 21 or 22. Its also cheaper transport 13/14 than 21/22.

That sounds strange, but I suppose this is why Fiji have done so well at 7's and not XV's. Same with the relative success of Kenya.

There is still no mention of numbers there. Perhaps you have them?

He's invented touch rugby...but with tackles.