Yep, I would agree with that. I was happy Wakefield won tonight.

I can't help myself here..... Did you watch the game? Did you think about what you typed?

I know its different on telly sometimes, but we scored a hatful - with 1 recognised ball player for 60 odd mins, we had 2 men limp off early not to return. We completely dominated the first 20 mins or so, creating pressure that lead to (granted a fairly weak to start with) defense cracking. As has already been pointed out, you can only beat whats infront of you and tonight (as we have 2 other times this year so far) did with relative ease - all things considered.

wakey were different class tonight if it had not been for bentham warrington would have been nild did you go

Bitter wakey hating t*****R!

Of course you were.

The big fanny is probably still vomiting now.

Just as well we play Shudds twice then, another 4 easy points,

Didn't you have a match of your own to watch tonight?

Too obsessed with us to even bother with it, he probably doesn't realise sheffield played today.

wow, so many eager biting fishies.

usual suspects mind.

Wow so many moderators who are tools.

Usual suspects mind.

Oh I see, it's trolling when aimed at you but because he's one of yours it's fishing. Considerinf Shudds fans are the most sensitive in the game you suddenly seem awfully leniant, how conveniant, how typically two faced.

aw bless, is someone picking on you, how precious.

No one was trolling. Wakefield scored 8 tries, of those 3 were from kicks, one was an interception and two were soft tries where Ferguson barged over the line. That leaves two tries that took some creative play, Blaymire's second and George's try. Blaymire's was as much down to terrible defence as creativity on Wakefield's part although Martin did well to set it up, and I have already praised George's try. As I have said, Wakefield generally rely on kicks and poor defensive efforts to score, which is ok because on paper they don't have the players to break down other teams. I've already praised their kicking game, so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Are you trying to suggest that this is not the case and that Wakefield beat Warrington with flair and skill tonight?

What is funny, the fact that you have absolutely no counter argument and are making yourself look a fool? I can see why that is funny for everyone else but why are you laughing?

|

When you post something other than the bile you have posted already which is worthy of a response i will let you know by replying in kind, whilst you are an utter c0ck i will respond in the same way.

Well done Wakey, with the injuries that they picked up during the game it could have been even worse for Wire had the 2 Wakey players not picked up the injuries. I'm very surprised with how Wakey have started but with JK they do have a very good coach who is brilliant at getting the best out of his players.

Brad Drew thus far is wallking the MOS award, early days I know but he is playing out of his skin and is literally carrying the Wakey side.

Because you're a tw@???

It is clearly apparent you are new to the game.

Creativity comes in many forms,not just through passing.
To suggest that creating a try cannot be seen as creative play because it came from a kick,shows your undoubted lack of knowledge of the game.
The Martin kick for the opening try,was well executed and created(theres that word again) the try for Blaymire.The reason Wakey were in that postion was on the back of two prevouis kicks that enabled Wakefield to build pressure and create(there it is again) an opportunity.
The Martin kick for the Halley try,once again created pressure on Riley.

In the second half a creative cross field kick from Drew,very nearly put Atkins away - but to your way of thinking,if Atkins had scored that wasnt creative.

But hey,stick with it,you will pick up the basics of the game eventually.

That is highly unlikely.

Ah,come on man,wheres your compassion.
You cant just give on people.


























But in this case your probably correct.

I finally know who this bafoon is, i have received some insider info on Mr Wes Fooligan and after reading this they must be one and the same as both are as clueless as each other.

[url=http://nakedleague.com/2009/02/james-lowes-press-conference-transcript/#more-410Clicky here to find out who this dumbass really is.[/url

boooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

booooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

boooooooooooooooooooooooooo




warringtons year again is it eddie

No one picking on us love, if you want to look stupid and petty carry on.