Nothing like optimism for your own club.

I'm not a Saints fan.

HTH.

again not watched it back yet but when there no it looked fine.

I know. Your name gives it away. Ok, forget the irony. You don't think Warrington will get there?

HTH.

I think you've just issued a woooooooosh !

No.

HTH.

Meh.

Nah, can't see em losing four on the bounce

Ok.

Watch it back.

I work with children so I'm used to responses like that.
It's all about patience

Is that 11,195 and you are happy with that.

it was the right decision. mcguires torso was behind smiths but the ball was in front of his (mcguires) torso and smiths feet were behind his own torso ie smiths feet were behind the ball.

im struggling to see why people cant see that. use the poisition of the ball and smiths feet in relation to leon pryces back leg if you still dot get it.

No its the increase I am happy with. When a lot of clubs are seeing decreases in attendances ours have increased which has to be good does it not?

(what this has to do with the game I don't know but never mind!)

She was responding to my question of the Eastmond try

But good description on the Leeds try that everyone is getting wet about!! It was a try. Deal with it folks!

on eastmonds try he clearly did push the ball into donald, but he was in the act of picking it up at the time. if it was knocked on it was so tiny that no try should be disallowed for it

Having watched it back he never lets go of it so it's not a knock on.

It hit Donald. Its a knock on. But benefit of doubt to attacking team.

It turns out that Lee Smith's feet were at least level with McGuires when he kicked through. Benefit of doubt to attacking team.

There was only one angle which showed his position relative to the ball and he was clearly in front on that. The one you are referring to didn't show Smith as he was obscured so there is no telling which frame it was.

I can't understand why they don't use maths to decide offside decisions. Freeze the play on the frame the ball leaves the foot, draw a line across from there and one along from where the receiving player is at that moment. Offside calls aren't subjective, they are black and white.

The fans could see the two lines and there would be no moaning and it would take about 10 seconds to decide rather than 3 minutes.

And a try was given

Are you claiming Bentham was biased?

It's not though, it doesn't matter that it hit Donald, because it was also touching Eastmond when it did. Otherwise we'd have a knock on everytime a tackler touched the ball.

No, I'm claiming he was wrong.

What?

Well clearly after viewing more evidence than you have seen, and with the benefit of being neutral, and also adding to the fact that a try was given, it would appear, that on this occasion Mr Saddended!, that its you who is wrong

You surely can't fail to understand what I put. How the hell is it a knock on when Eastmond never lets go of it? There has to be a gap between Eastmond's hand and the ball for it to be a knock on when it touches Donald. I could use the same 2@y line you did about me being wrong but I won't.

I'd say almost every single person (Bar you) in the ground thought Smith's wasn't a try. The Leeds fans sat down en mass, the Saints fans cheered and everyone gasped when 'TRY' showed up.