I agree with this. I often wonder how many big lads have their talents wasted because they are automatically put at prop and told to stick hold of the ball and drive it in every time they get it, regardless of whether they can pass, kick, step, run fast, dive in at the corner etc. You also see a lot of lads who develop early wasted in their age group too because the coach would rather keep them in the team and stroll through the opposition every week than play him an age up where he will have more of a challenge.

Absolutely. They don't have the skills or the mentality because they've never had to use it. Plus in the mean time they put off a host of other kids when they're knocking them flying for fun.


I agree wholeheartedly with what Bren said on the youth/junior game. I'd also like to see a massive change in the open age system too. Too often it's a violent intimidating atmosphere and we need to change the culture of the game at that level.
We also need proper social 5/6 a side touch rugby leagues establishing. It's a massive untapped market in my opinion.

It's very easy to say they should do this do that,having played,coached watched the game for 30+ years I actually believe most clubs ameuter and professional get a very lot correct more right than wrong.Unfortunately there is a shortage of players especially from high school upwards this is the age when little Johnny realises the game is far tougher than he was expecting and decides to call it a day.

Sounds harsh yes but you just cannot just produce players they need a base in which to learn from,scouts are usually pretty good in getting players onto embed the pathways programmes which are now extensively run across the board. So from the age of 12/13 the vetting process begins in eliminating which lads have what it takes to move them into a scholarship programme. Players just don't come from ameuter clubs into a acadamy environment at the age of 17 or very rarely they do,it's a long drawn out process almost a military process of elimination. Size,skill,ability,fitness and a will to put your body through the pain barrier every day is a requirement to make it to pro level,even then there is a massive amount of luck involved. For anyone who believes you can just set up regional academies and flood them with lads off the street your very misguided on the standards required to become a pro player.

But that's not what the embedded pathway is about, it's about a clear pathway within the game at any age and at any point in the development of players, not "eliminating" them at 13 years old.
The system is changing and changing for the better IMO, I still has a long way to go, however, whilst we have an RFL running the game at tiers 1&2 and independent leagues and bodies governing the community game, we will have a fragmented system that is not fit for purpose.
There isn't a shortage of talent, there is a shortage of "correct" resource to develop that talent, there has been a big jump in participation numbers From u7-U10's since the introduction of the "sky try" programe with some fantastic success at certain clubs ((SL mainly) who have been targeted to develop these age groups or loose central funding.
It's not all doom and gloom, but it doesn't help when a club decides to scrap its academy and suddenly makes a plan to work with another club which in reality isn't in line with the RFL mandate.

When I did my Level 2 and my Embed the Pathway course they put a reasonable amount of emphasis on the difference between ability and maturity, and also first/fourth quartile babies which maybe helped a bit with counteracting this. There's a lot of support behind leagues being split by weight rather than age in Australia/NZ and I'd be curious to see the same over here. I remember reading a report that found those kids who were bigger at age 14-16 were less likely to make it as Super League players, presumably because they hadn't had to develop their skills as much as they were able to rely on being bigger than everyone.

Why would this temporary measure be necessary? I really can't take the idea that we are so efficient that we have absolutely exhausted the player pool seriously.

Absolutely.

But sadly not every coach does the Embed the Pathway course and fewer actually embrace the ethos of it properly, and even fewer are at clubs where they would be helped to do so, and yet fewer clubs are in league structures that help them to do so.

You're right on the stats about the young players and I know Leeds have been actively searching for quartile 4 players for this reason.

The Embed the Pathway scheme has given me a glimmer of hope because at least I know that the RFL recognise the issues. It just depends on how willing they are to confront the amateur leagues and force them to change. Right now they're sort of preaching to the converted, although that's not necessarily a bad thing to begin with.

The other side of the coin that is almost always missed by those who insist the amateur leagues are fine, is that the amateur setup has 2 purposes, not just 1. Yes they have to develop talent to push up the hierarchy, but their other equally important purpose is as a gateway to the sport for present/future supporters and sponsors. In this regard the amateur setup cannot be described as anything but a failure with only bright spots of mediocrity.

18 months ago, youth was the focus www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... ---9239057

18 months ago, youth was the focus www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... ---9239057