One thing Catalans has going for it ATM is that its the one foreign team in SL. If Toronto and other North American teams enter SL then the interest in Catalans will decrease and they'll become yesterday's news.

They do not produce games on Saturday because it costs SKY money. At the moment they can show 14 extra games for very little cost.

The question you asked was what Catalan bring to the UK game, the answer is a alot.

For those who don't know this, the French based BeiN Sports gets a feed of the two Sky televised SL games every week, which it shows at its own convenience (sometimes live, sometimes not). Having the BeiN Sports video feed of Catalans games on Sky would be partial payback to Sky for Sky's service to BeiN.

If Toulouse gets promoted to Super League, its home games will be on BeiN and also available for direct feed to Sky.

If you took the Catalans home games away because Catalans were demoted from Super League Sky would not be happy.

The best outcome for Sky would be to have both Catalans and Toulouse in Super League. That way it could be guaranteed a French Super League home game every Saturday night, and for minimal cost.

That's right,let's make sure the French teams are exempt from relegation,stuff the rest.Yer not reet int yed thee.

Why does a Leigh fan laugh at how much Catalan bring to SL, strange. Very strange.
Printer makes a good point about the potential damage to Catalan if there was another overseas club in SL.

Although Perpignan has the attraction of being close enough to visit for just a couple of days, there is little doubt that Toronto wins hands down as the better "destination" for a break, albeit more expensive to visit and many fans may choose Canada as their overseas trip.
Likewise, Toulouse, if they were in the top flight, would also dilute the number of fans visiting Catalan.

"we" do seem to be heading blindly into unknown territory (with the possible further expansion of SL) but it's time to show us the money and seriously think about where the game is heading what the effect's will be having SL spread half way round the world, with a possible 3/4 overseas clubs in the top flight.

Apart from 4/5 current SL clubs being "safe", everyone else becomes vulnerable in the new world order.

Perhaps, instead of protecting the new overseas wanabee's, we should set a minimum number for English clubs, which would theoretically protect the domestic game ?

You honesty believe that "away fans" is [ithat [/iimportant a metric as to the contribution a club makes? More important than so many others where Catalans really does blow many heartland clubs out of the water? Factors like financial stability, corporate revenue, TV audiences, player development, quality of facilities and home support?

Reading some of the comments on here, "away fans" are the be-all and end-all. My point is that as far as any other club goes, a game against Toronto or Catalans should be an opportunity to engage the local community. If clubs are getting crap crowds against expansion clubs, it's because those clubs are either lazy at marketing, crap at marketing, or both.

Interestingly, we're still waiting for your "oh so simple" explaination as to how we generate the revenue to make the investment that will "make the heartlands strong". You seemed to scurry back to your hidey hole pretty quickly after being call out on that.

And well done on reverting to type with the chippy little insults. Bravo matey. At least you tried.

The trouble with the 14 year SL last time was the reduction in allowed quota players that went along with it.
More teams but a reduced player pool? Only in RL could that be seen as a sensible move. But all it really meant was that english born players could suddenly demand a premium price for their services regardless of their level of talent.

If there is to be an increase in clubs, then quotas need to be done away with. I know the arguments about how foreign players limit the opportunities for young british players, but I personally think the opposite is true as it means that young british players have to push themselves that much harder in order to force themselves into contention for places which means the players that breakthrough will be the best of the best which means the pool for the international team gets stronger, which means the home nation national teams can get stronger which means the international scene gets stronger.

Totally disagree.

For young players to improve, the most important thing is for them to have the opportunity to play and before the reduction in quota numbers, coupled with an increase in "home grown players needed in the first team squad (albeit under the relative safety no relegation), we began to see greater numbers of youngsters getting their chance.
Many, of course, dont quite make it but, the return of P/R will continue to see clubs too afraid to blood young players.
It's no coincidence that the likes of Wigan, Leeds and Saints, who many believe have the greatest number of youngsters coming through are also, pretty damn safe from ever facing relegation (we'll ignore the blip that Leeds had a couple of seasons ago).
Without yong players getting serious game time, we will continue to have a desperate shortage of quality British youngsters coming through.
Behind this of course is the need to prize kids away from their I phones and Play Stations and get them involved in the game.
You are right about needing top quality imports, instead of "also rans". However with the disparity in salary cap between the NRL and SL, this isn't going to happen in the foreseeable, apart from those in the twilight of their careers or those trying to get their careers back on track after injury etc.

Of course, to make it to the top, you need the best players around you but, not getting into a star studded team wont help anyone.

You could argue that the England team which went within one score of winning the World Cup was the product of the reduced quotas.

In any case, I think the quota issue is a bit of a dead one now. It mattered when our clubs still had the cash to lure lots of Kiwis and Aussies here. But our salary cap is now so far behind Down Under, that even squad fillers in Oz are on salaries which would put them in the top paid cohort over here. The only reason I think it's worthwhile maintaining quota restricvtions is because I hope we might see the salary cap rising sometime soon.

Under the current system, it's ridiculous to say that clubs are afraid to blood young players due to the threat of relegation. It's not a trap-door for the team coming bottom of SL, and even if a team finds themselves in the middle 8's due to bringing through younger players, they still have ample opportunity to regain their place.

To be honest, the OP was just stating what he'd read, and questioned the value of the original reduction in numbers and the reintroduction P&R. This rapidly changed into "assumptions" that Toronto, Toulouse and New York would be included in SL, and hey, that actually means that the current numbers in SL needs to reduce by 1, not increase.

I stand by my thoughts that new teams need to prove themselves on the field. This means that they should start off in Championship 1, where they can find their feet in the competition. To be fair, this is what Toronto have done, and if they do gain promotion at the end of 2018 via the 8's then fair enough.

What we should know before the season starts though (it would be good to know already, but this is RL after all), is what the position will be at the end of the season if there will be an increase in SL clubs for the next year. Top 5 in the middle 8's and the MPG between 6th and 7th? That would give Toronto and Toulouse ample opportunity to stake their claim.

Sorry but, whilst ever there has been the threat of relegation, in the old first division, Super League (in the earlier years) and especially now, clubs in jeopardy go for experience over youth EVERY time, which necessarily impacts on the opportunities for less experienced players.
Yes, there have to be certain numbers of "home grown" players in each squad but, come the horse trading towards the end of the season, either to avoid the middle 8 or, to qualify for it, there isn't a club in England or France that wont take the "tried & tested" option over youth, not one.
SL clubs do have ample opportunity to retain their top flight status but, take a look at the MPG squads and/or late season signings.
Every club so far, when it comes to the crunch, has tried to bring in some experience .
Of course, clubs have to manage their squads through the season and the kid's do get a few games but, the point is that, when it comes to the crunch, experience is ALWAYS trusted over youth.
Under the franchise system, there were more clubs willing to play their youngsters for more games and this did appear to bring a whole raft of new faces through, which can only be good for the game.
I'm not advocating getting rid of P/R, just stating fact.
Btw, it doesn't always work.

Simple one to fix. Do what football do, and stop clubs bringing in new players after a certain point in the season.

That lot sums you up. Of course I do. Me and many others look forward to the local derbies far more than any other game.

I love it when the Leeds and Cas fans turn up and the singing and banter begins. Stuff your sterile corporate idea or RL.

I'd rather go to a full post office road than London, Birmingham or Toronto.

I don't need RL to go to Toronto I can go there on holiday. But a warm evening watching us stuff Leeds or narrowly lose to Cas. That's what it all about to me, against Catalan or any other non grad club it's just porential points.

Problem with people like you is you've lost your RL soul.

Merry xmas

On the topic of the importance of "away fans".....a few years back I did a season long comparison of the gates at Leeds, Wigan and FC. Factoring in local derbies, as well as the visits of Catalans and London, the overall result was that at 15 quid a ticket, away fans were worth about 20 grand to the clubs per game, therefore London and Catalan were costing each club 40k in lost revenue. To put that into perspective for you....that's about 2% of the income the clubs get from the TV deal.
Furthermore, Clubs like the 3 named above "go hard" when marketing the games featuring London and Catalans as they UNDERSTAND that SL isn't a league where you're "entitled" to get revenue from anywhere, but a pro sports league where you reap what you sew.

I understand that you'd like Wakey v Castleford all day every day, but unfortunately, tradition and heritage don't pay the bills, SKY and other TV companies do......and whilst you're waiting to see 10k at PO Road, we need the TV companies and their audiences.

For wakefield, absolutely the metric is away fans. That’s what keeps them afloat

Regards

King James

From a club and business angle, what would you rather have???

500 Leigh fans,

or zero Toulouse fans. and maybe at a push 10 Catalan or Toronto fans

Or a million pounds in central funding from the improved broadcast deal, increased sponsorship opportunities, improved public image, more local interest among non-traditional fans, almost every League 1 club got their biggest crowd of the season against Toronto and York had their biggest crowd in decades but yeah WHAT ABOUT THE 500 AWAY FANS THOUGH!!!!!!!

Hmmm....

500 Leigh fans delivers at best 10k in revenue.....for one game where Leigh are the visitors. A superleague club costs somewhere between 4.5 million and 5 million a year to run......so your 10k is .00000022% of the turnover of the club AT BEST.
Catalans gives SKY 13+ TV games for a pittance and is icing on their cake when it comes to the cash they give the game....money by the way that is 36% of the clubs turnover AT WORST........
.....so to recap, you'd bin 36% of the incomeof a club for .00000022% of the income because of "away fans"



It is the responsibility of a club to fill their own ground and not be dependent on away fans........Wigan, Leeds, Hull and Wire don't rely on away fans, but piddling little clubs on 6k and under seem to think that having that extra 10k is more important that spreading the games reach...which explains why after 125 years they are piddling little clubs........

..as an aside, just had a link pop up on FB saying Bath are playing Wasps....pictures of the clubs jerseys with Dyson and Land Rover as sponsors.....I wonder if either of those international brands are concerned with the number of away fans travelling to The Rec. I see Leigh are sponsored by a UK courier Company franchise operation who file their accounts under the heading of "small business holding"....I bet they don't care for the number of away fans either

Gutters, you are dealing with an intellectually challenged person. You must remember that he is from Leigh after all.

Roy, you are wasting your time. Expansion lovers are all over the VT (Not that many of them I know, but they care about how our game can allegedly improve, rather than their own club





) Most folk who aren't bothered about the 'Planet Earth RFL project' don't bother commenting, as the usual 5 or 6 suspects will 'tell them off' !!



I miss Blackpool Borough.....left to rot by the RFL.

Not forgetting the usual 7 London Broncos fans.....what a joke of a club, eh CALL ME GOD !

The reality is we currently have 14 English clubs capable of a place in SL, 2 French and 1 Canadian. Now get Avignon in the Mix with New Jersey/NYC and we almost have the 2 x 10 Structure we need to grow into and from.
The uneducated Chorley rabble are holding our sport back

SL 1 & SL 2 sound like a good idea, until you think a little deeper.

Unless you have 2 conferences say, East & West, having SL1 and SL2 is effectively a re branding of SL and The Championship.
You would actually be cutting the top flight by 2 teams, not too wise really.

You could go for a much larger league of 16/18 clubs but just play each other once, either home or away , depending how the fixtures are drawn up and then have some kind of split/play off system.

who is 'holding it back' ? Us Chorley fans have NO say in the matter.....