You know Smokey will have a bench mark of 26 games to claiss them as regulars, dont you?

Then he would still be lieing as none of the 3 he mentioned played that many games

Thats nice. Im not sure how, bar the inclusion of Netherton, you thought it was an argument against [iIn fact only Murrell, Fisher, and Cockayne featured with any regularity and are still there now,[/i but its nice all the same.

They didnt come through the british RL system which is where you said the players we could add would come from.

Well no, the point you made was that there was players in youth teams, on dual contracts, and in the lower leagues who could play SL. I asked if there were, why are there so many overseas players in SL?

Yes sorry Smokey but what with you constantly changing your arguement all the time what do you expect.
Stiil as you rightly state Netherton proves that you were infact talking rubbish.

Well you will be the only person on the whole planet to think that Eastys post backs your argument.

What do you think about it I changed?

It was a simply misunderstanding, Easty clearly made a mistake in what he thought my argument was compared to what it actually was and he named 12 players who dont play for HKR any more

It seems you still dont understand it.

Easty's post doesnt back my argument, it doesnt even address it.

Bur does knock back this post.



They did build a team in NL1

Bar Vella, Ward, Bauer, Lovegrove, O'neill, Dyer, Hardman, Lennon, Cooke, Tandy, Gannon, they did. So apart from the 12 first team players they signed.

when 12 players make a team? Or squad for that instance?

The argument was that I suggested that you could potentially take 60/70 percent of a Championship team up to SL with you as HKR did , you suggested they only took up 3 players

So you were WRONG

End of , that bum crack of yours needs a wipe

This is why i don't respect Smokey as an authority. He doesn't have the good grace to admit he's wrong. He's no better than a common troll. He's full of it.

Wow...a troll calling a troll a troll.

Bazza - you came out of your mammy's tuppence trolling, carrying that very same irony meter in your chubby little hands.

Yes but everybody knows that Littlerich is just being entertaining , he doesn't take anything seriously , our friendly Leeds fan on the other hand however ?

If him posting has set it to max you have just done this.

The words 'littlerich' and 'entertaining' should NEVER be used in the same post.

EVER.

Yes Bazza. Toddle off to the NRL forum.

'Bazza'

sorry? I honestly dont know what you are trying to say here.

I cant believe this is still confusing you. I never suggested they only took up three players. You would need to be quite stupid to believe the statement
meant they only took up three players. It would be a ridiculous statement for anybody to make. What i clearly said was there was only three (it was in fact 4) players who played regularly for HKA in 2007 and are still their now.

I honestly dont know how such a simple statement managed to confuse so many people.

leave littlerich alone, hes a secret viking and as such is under our protection.
thankyou though PHIPPS, you calling littlerich a troll is the funniest thing i have heard in a long while.

We've being up 5 years Smokey. The fact we have 4 players that feature regularly after 5 years of being promoted is pretty good. However your changing this argument to suit your needs. Your initial comment was to Rovers only bring a handful of players up from the NL's. You where proved wrong and are now changing your argument to suit your own needs.