Quote ="tb"There's no rule on stating points deduction is relative to debt paid. There is and always has been a rule stating that the punishment for going into administration is a points deduction of up to a maximum. Taking account of mitigating circumstances, whatever they were, has always been part of implementing the rule. There has never been a rule stating that the maximum points deduction is the also the minimum, nor that it is mandatory.
So, in response to your claim that there's been a rule change, based - [ike so much else you've posted on these thread – on 'facts' that only exist inside your own head:
"What are you banging on about?"
Honest. If I were you, I'd give it a rest. You're not only making yourself look a fool, but severely undermining any case that might exist to criticise either the Crusaders or the RFL.'"
That's a no then, as no direct evidence on either side bar taking over cases into account their is no point carrying on. Undermining? I don't get that context, the only undermining is adapting rules to fit different parties.
All I will end on is the fool the one who looks wide and see's things with an open clear mind or the one who keeps his eyes shuts and waits for developments to effect them / really mess the game up. I just hope those with influence start getting their act together sooner rather than later.
