|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 1277 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Gronk!"Leave Mr Dog alone, he's been wrong every time in this thread
Although based on another forum, making false claims is the MO of Fev fans lately.'"
Heyup Gronky old mate. How's it going then? All well in Tiggerland?
Went down t'lane today but couldn't find this place to buy my snap from that you and Dicky have been going on about for a year now.
Oh, and to quote from the Wakey ground judgement:
"Castleford Tigers wish to pursue a retail scheme at the Wheldon Road site, but that is out of centre and at best problematic. Even so as Mr Francis noted that site alone could not generate significant revenue to fund a stadium let alone the lengthy new road link. Where would the rest come from even if a retail scheme came forward? The evidence is that it is unlikely, as the Tigers’ own announcement makes clear."
Maybe I'm not going to be wrong after all then, eh?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3224 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2018 | May 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Just a passing thought. Given that most SL clubs appear to be having an uphill battle to turn a decent profit, could Redhall be tempted to reduce SL to 12?
Bradford off to the Championship, and in that nice shiny new stadium that may get built at newmarket, we could have a new combined team of Calder.....
12 teams fairly painlessly, and a more financially secure new team underpinned by the profit on selling Castleford's ground.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1346 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| When are Leeds going to redevelop Headingley?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Barnabus"When are Leeds going to redevelop Headingley?'"
Carefully and sustainably, with our own money.
The funding was in place for a new South Stand last year. It was to be a replacement with the same capacity as currently just with corporate hospitality boxes to provide additional income. The council, in it's infinite wisdom, denied the application.
One of the reasons being, I sh|t you not, that the increased capacity would put additional strain on the local transport network and local population.
Now, at the time of the application the South Stand capacity had been reduced by IIRC around 2,000 (now back up again after a few hundred thousand spent on it) so the Council's rationale was that a new stand would increase the capacity of the stand, despite it only being a temporary reduction and the capacity had been at least what it is now (and previously higher) for over 50 years. Also the local population are predominantly students who are gone after a couple of years anyway.
The only stand the council would allow at the time was one at a size of the reduced capacity, with no corporate boxes and with significant sums of money put in to making it "aesthetically pleasing".
So the council would only allow Leeds to spend millions (with no council financial assistance) on a new stand that is smaller and provides less income than he current one. Needless to say, Mr Hetherington was not a happy bunny. Sadly some of the councillors on the planning cmte seemed determined to deny permission regardless.
When you take a look at how the monstrosity that masquerades as a new cricket stand at Headingley was waved through planning and with significant council financial assistance for YCCC in recent years, it beggars belief that the same councillors can be so intransigent toward a profit-making, highly successful sports club, yet go out of their way to do everything possible to assist one that so comprehensively isn't.
As I'm sure Wakefield fans will confirm, Leeds City Council are @r5eholes.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1346 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Him"Carefully and sustainably, with our own money.
The funding was in place for a new South Stand last year. It was to be a replacement with the same capacity as currently just with corporate hospitality boxes to provide additional income. The council, in it's infinite wisdom, denied the application.
One of the reasons being, I sh|t you not, that the increased capacity would put additional strain on the local transport network and local population.
Now, at the time of the application the South Stand capacity had been reduced by IIRC around 2,000 (now back up again after a few hundred thousand spent on it) so the Council's rationale was that a new stand would increase the capacity of the stand, despite it only being a temporary reduction and the capacity had been at least what it is now (and previously higher) for over 50 years. Also the local population are predominantly students who are gone after a couple of years anyway.
The only stand the council would allow at the time was one at a size of the reduced capacity, with no corporate boxes and with significant sums of money put in to making it "aesthetically pleasing".
So the council would only allow Leeds to spend millions (with no council financial assistance) on a new stand that is smaller and provides less income than he current one. Needless to say, Mr Hetherington was not a happy bunny. Sadly some of the councillors on the planning cmte seemed determined to deny permission regardless.
When you take a look at how the monstrosity that masquerades as a new cricket stand at Headingley was waved through planning and with significant council financial assistance for YCCC in recent years, it beggars belief that the same councillors can be so intransigent toward a profit-making, highly successful sports club, yet go out of their way to do everything possible to assist one that so comprehensively isn't.
As I'm sure Wakefield fans will confirm, Leeds City Council are @r5eholes.'"
Seems daft, I agree, especially the bit about the added strain on local transport/population etc.
I know the area well (I live in Leeds), and I'd have thought the 5/6 students per household, alot having their own cars, would be the cause of the 'strain', not 13 Rhinos games per year.
The council have already put a load of 'road blocks' in and around Ash Road as a result of the vast number of cars driving through and parked up along those streets.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4259 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2020 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Him"
As I'm sure Wakefield fans will confirm, Leeds City Council are @r5eholes.'"
Given the severe dressing down Leeds CC got in the planning inspectors report for Newmarket, the political leaders and the members of the Leeds area planning committees have to be more cautious about objecting to schemes for what would appear to be mainly political reasons (like the inspector effectively concluded on Newmarket) & not valid planning reason supported by the national & local frameworks and planning law.
I think if true, and your story confirms what I had heard, then GH needs to think (under advice from a good planning consultant) about putting in a planning application anyway, and if turned down, look to go through the appeals process. I think after a very rocky start the current government appear to have gotten a handle on planning issues now and appear to have found a good balance on appropriate and inappropriate development.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14970 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Inflatable_Armadillo"Given the severe dressing down Leeds CC got in the planning inspectors report for Newmarket, the political leaders and the members of the Leeds area planning committees have to be more cautious about objecting to schemes for what would appear to be mainly political reasons (like the inspector effectively concluded on Newmarket) & not valid planning reason supported by the national & local frameworks and planning law.
I think if true, and your story confirms what I had heard, then GH needs to think (under advice from a good planning consultant) about putting in a planning application anyway, and if turned down, look to go through the appeals process. I think after a very rocky start the current government appear to have gotten a handle on planning issues now and appear to have found a good balance on appropriate and inappropriate development.'"
The impression I get is that Hetherington will put an application in again in a year or so time. Probably taking some of the objections from the previous rejection on board but stressing the absolute need for at least the same capacity as now and the corporate boxes. As I understand it Leeds have permission for the smaller/useless plan but that is not something Hetherington is prepared to undertake, which is why the improvements/repairs to the South Stand (which they were trying to avoid having to make) went ahead, so that the South Stand can be fully functional until better planning permission is gained.
I do know Hetherington was privately furious about the decision, which is why there was a carefully worded release on the website naming the appropriate councillors!
But hopefully if as you say the planning cmte are more reasonable now then it won't be too long before Darth tries again.
I usually bow to either your or MjM's knowledge on things like this though!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 18789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Salford have lost "several revenue streams after leaving the Willows".
Not all new stadiums bring stability, especially ones which are financed by external money men.
[urlhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18577880[/url
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 6865 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
The present position with Headingley is complicated, as ever. The original scheme for the bells and whistles South Stand with boxes etc was ditched at an early stage - planning said it was unlikely to be approved and my understanding from Leeds is that they decided that even they would struggle to sell yet more corporate space (although that is debatable as it continues to sell out quite often).
So they went through a process of discussion with LCC as to what might be acceptable - the end result being the really crappy scheme that was put through for public consultation which IIRC would actually have reduced capacity overall. I spent half an hour chatting to the architect during that consultation and he was downbeat about the whole thing saying he'd done dozens of revisions, each time reducing the capacity and making it less appealing and less able to cover its costs.
The consultation did not appear to go well. Fans were outraged at this unambitious scheme; a small number of residents were also outraged at it despite all the concessions made. Most residents, such as they are, no doubt couldn't care less as they will be long gone by the time it is built.
Having had the roasting from the fans, the plans the club actually submitted to planning were not the crappy ones which went through that very public consultation but instead were an earlier version of the scheme, with a higher capacity and more substantial facilities. The planning committee said this was a very naughty thing to do and that the planning and consultation process was not well served by such shenanigans. And then promptly approved the larger scheme anyway:
www.therhinos.co.uk/news/17267.php
And then everything went quiet. Hetherington mumbled something about finding a new funding model which to some read as hoping LCC might lob a bit of cash their way. And there are some quite good rumours that the development is on hold whilst Caddick makes an exit and leaves it to a new owner to make a decision.
As it stands, this new SS as pictured below is approved and Leeds have several million ÂŁ in the bank ready to pay for most of it - I can't see anything larger being approved and I can't see there being a cheaper time to build it. But tens of thousands was spent on the existing stand earlier in the year so what happens next is open to question.
|
|
The present position with Headingley is complicated, as ever. The original scheme for the bells and whistles South Stand with boxes etc was ditched at an early stage - planning said it was unlikely to be approved and my understanding from Leeds is that they decided that even they would struggle to sell yet more corporate space (although that is debatable as it continues to sell out quite often).
So they went through a process of discussion with LCC as to what might be acceptable - the end result being the really crappy scheme that was put through for public consultation which IIRC would actually have reduced capacity overall. I spent half an hour chatting to the architect during that consultation and he was downbeat about the whole thing saying he'd done dozens of revisions, each time reducing the capacity and making it less appealing and less able to cover its costs.
The consultation did not appear to go well. Fans were outraged at this unambitious scheme; a small number of residents were also outraged at it despite all the concessions made. Most residents, such as they are, no doubt couldn't care less as they will be long gone by the time it is built.
Having had the roasting from the fans, the plans the club actually submitted to planning were not the crappy ones which went through that very public consultation but instead were an earlier version of the scheme, with a higher capacity and more substantial facilities. The planning committee said this was a very naughty thing to do and that the planning and consultation process was not well served by such shenanigans. And then promptly approved the larger scheme anyway:
www.therhinos.co.uk/news/17267.php
And then everything went quiet. Hetherington mumbled something about finding a new funding model which to some read as hoping LCC might lob a bit of cash their way. And there are some quite good rumours that the development is on hold whilst Caddick makes an exit and leaves it to a new owner to make a decision.
As it stands, this new SS as pictured below is approved and Leeds have several million ÂŁ in the bank ready to pay for most of it - I can't see anything larger being approved and I can't see there being a cheaper time to build it. But tens of thousands was spent on the existing stand earlier in the year so what happens next is open to question.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 1277 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5035 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2021 | Oct 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
It really is quite the obsession for you isn't it?
Just so you know - Cas have not been able to do anything since handing over to Opus, there is literally nothing they can do but wait.
Oh and nobody from Cas says oh sorry nothing has happened for a year, that is added by the writer.
|
|
It really is quite the obsession for you isn't it?
Just so you know - Cas have not been able to do anything since handing over to Opus, there is literally nothing they can do but wait.
Oh and nobody from Cas says oh sorry nothing has happened for a year, that is added by the writer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17983 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Gronk!"It really is quite the obsession for you isn't it?
Just so you know - Cas have not been able to do anything since handing over to Opus, there is literally nothing they can do but wait.
Oh and nobody from Cas says oh sorry nothing has happened for a year, that is added by the writer.'"
You aren't really comparing like for like here.
I dont think that Leeds are waiting for a supermarket to hand over a large wedge of cash before they can move forward.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5035 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2021 | Oct 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="wrencat1873"You aren't really comparing like for like here.
I dont think that Leeds are waiting for a supermarket to hand over a large wedge of cash before they can move forward.
'"
What are you on about?
Or did you miss the quoting of the Fev troll trying to have a dig at Cas for the 100th time in this thread?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1346 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Gronk!"What are you on about?
Or did you miss the quoting of the Fev troll trying to have a dig at Cas for the 100th time in this thread?
'"
Cas should be discussed on another thread.
This thread is for stadium [udevelopments[/u, and there's certainly nothing developing at Cas.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 17983 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Gronk!"What are you on about?
Or did you miss the quoting of the Fev troll trying to have a dig at Cas for the 100th time in this thread?
'"
Apologies Gronk, I really must concentrate harder nistead of jumping in
I thought your post was comparing Cas to Leeds
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 215 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2014 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Leeds council objected to the Headingley plans, the Wakefield plans and refused to upgrade South Leeds stadium when Hunslet got promoted to the top division a few years ago after they had promised to do so when Hunslet gave up their rights to play at Elland Road, which was council owned at the time. Do they have an anti RL agenda?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13870 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| LCC opposed the Newmarket Development because the leader, ironically called Keith Wakefield, is a ward councillor for Methley, where the majority of the objections came from.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 18789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| 56,384 views on this topic.
If each one of those views were turned into bricks we'd have two brand new stadiums.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6268 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2015 | Jul 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Too True!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9426 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Not strictly a stadium development, but at LSV there wll shortly be a Marstons pub right outside the ground, which should help to get fans together before a game and create a decent atmosphere pre match.
Looks like they've bought a lot of land too, so maybe a big beer garden too.
www.marstonstaverns.co.uk/leigh/whistlingwren
|
|
Not strictly a stadium development, but at LSV there wll shortly be a Marstons pub right outside the ground, which should help to get fans together before a game and create a decent atmosphere pre match.
Looks like they've bought a lot of land too, so maybe a big beer garden too.
www.marstonstaverns.co.uk/leigh/whistlingwren
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 18789 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="jonny the leyther"Not strictly a stadium development, but at LSV there wll shortly be a Marstons pub right outside the ground, which should help to get fans together before a game and create a decent atmosphere pre match.
Looks like they've bought a lot of land too, so maybe a big beer garden too.
www.marstonstaverns.co.uk/leigh/whistlingwren'"
At Fax there's rumours that a brand new burger van is to be installed - WITH customer seating and tables around it. Gives the opportunity for fans to gather before the match and then go to the terraces together smelling of chip fat and netto burger.
Give us Super League - NOW.
|
|
Quote ="jonny the leyther"Not strictly a stadium development, but at LSV there wll shortly be a Marstons pub right outside the ground, which should help to get fans together before a game and create a decent atmosphere pre match.
Looks like they've bought a lot of land too, so maybe a big beer garden too.
www.marstonstaverns.co.uk/leigh/whistlingwren'"
At Fax there's rumours that a brand new burger van is to be installed - WITH customer seating and tables around it. Gives the opportunity for fans to gather before the match and then go to the terraces together smelling of chip fat and netto burger.
Give us Super League - NOW.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 27039 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2017 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="littlerich"56,384 views on this topic.
If each one of those views were turned into bricks we'd have two brand new stadiums.'"
Are you saying thats how many bricks you need to build two stadiums, you learn something new everyday on here.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36144 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Gronk!"What are you on about?
Or did you miss the quoting of the Fev troll trying to have a dig at Cas for the 100th time in this thread?
'"
Everyone is a troll who doesn't agree with you aye Gronky, sue me.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9043 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2023 | Jul 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Could be some movement on a south stand redevelopment at craven park in the next 2 weeks as well
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 730 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2014 | Apr 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="MrPhilb"Could be some movement on a south stand redevelopment at craven park in the next 2 weeks as well'"
Good news but at the moment I would like to hear some news about the North stand first
|
|
|
|
|