for "throwing punches".

Just when did the toughest sport in the world turn soft?

Never a sending off, both should hve been binned.
Ryan Bailey needs to have a word with himself.

Spoiled the game, or maybe made it better?

Has the knock-on rule changed too?

Probably for the cowardly act of hitting a man while he's lying on the floor. A little different to a fair square up. Correct decision by Ian Smith.

Unbelievable. Bailey gets attacked on the floor and yet again he is the only guilty party.

Bailey was elbowing Radford in the back of his head?

Or the cowardly act of elbowing an opposition player on the top of his head , I notice he only got up after somebody had hold of Radford

Not the only, people have sent they both should have gone.
Incase you didn't notice but Bailey started it with the several elbows to the head.
but yeah he's usually a saint and never puts in cheap shots to people on the floor himself...

so you too missed the repeated elbows to radfords head. and the headbutt by bailey on long?

you should be a superleague referee/touchjudge

I notice the forward passes have started as well

Typical Leeds fan with a "poor me" attitude



That should have been both off or nobody off, Smith bottled it or has been told to help Leeds, simple as.

See, now goes to the screen because Leeds told him to.

Where?

@ everyone painting Bailey out to be the only guilty man here. Are people trying to justify throwing punches to a man who was lying there defenseless?

Bailey may have been elbowing him In the head but that's not an excuse to start throwing
Punches at a player who is on he
Floor not even looking up. Right decision and the cut on baileys head didn't help

Are you going to justify throwing elbows to the back of somebodies head who's lying there defenceless?

I think you'll find Radford started it by holding Bailey down. Bailey shouldn't have attempted to escape the tackle with the elbow, but there was no excuse for throwing 2 punches at a grounded man. End of argument.

He was holding him preventing him from playing the ball



See my other post too.

Finally some sense.

The anti-Bailey/Leeds bias on here is cringeworthy.

Doesn't stop the fact Bailey should have been sent off too though, does it.

If it wasn't Bailey, everyone would be bemoaning Radford's antics. The anti Leeds brigadeis out in force tonight.

No, the fact is both should have been sent off, Bailey's blatant act of thuggery warranted a red, so did Radford's

Baileys one of my least favourite players but he didn't deserve it.

I agree.

You honestly believe Bailey shouild have been sent off? Would you have the same opinion if that was Rob Burrow "lashing out"?

Pathetic anti-Bailey bias.