So folks thoughts on the final, more even than some will give credit for.

Leeds having been there and done that will go in the more comfortable, Warrington on paper being the better team.

I think this will be a similar game to the Wigan/Leeds semi, the winner being by a score of 6 or less.

Head says Warrington, Heart says don't care

If Warrington approach it like they did the CC Finals against Leeds, then they should win.

A lot will be made of it being their first GF appearance, but they know what it's like to go into a Final and win.

If Bentham plays any part in the final put your money on Wolves

or silverwood tried his hardest for wigan on friday, it was almost like he was under instructions, or someone took his door off at half time

I hope for a great game and do not care who wins

I just hope it hinges on a massive refereeing blunder. It will sum up the season brilliantly.

Fascinating thread.

Awww did your team not make it to the pinnacle of the season? Again?

And now I hope Warrington win.

Although both sets of fans are mostly detestable.

A true fan of the game.

Bless!

U mad?

Head says Warrington, heart is unsure.

There are a few things working against them, such as this being their first GF and it being Leeds' umpteenth, but if they can rise to it they should win as squad for squad they are the better team imo.

I'm personally hoping Wire win as quite simply another Leeds victory at OT will be boring. Not to mention the fact that if Leeds become 5th place "champions" again, having won only 59% of their domestic fixtures, it will ruin next years league. I wouldn't begrudge the Wolves their double if they pulled it off, it would be very well deserved and make up for their disappointment last year.

Hope Warrington win, for a couple of years now they have been arguably the most entertaining side to watch, we need a new winner, we need for our comp to be less predictable than it has been, hopefully next season a side like Hull can make more of an impact in the play offs to make it more interesting.

I know, it's ruined the NRL too.
1999 - Melbourne - 67% of games won
2001 - Newcastle - 61%
2002 - Sydney - 62%
2005 - Wests - 58%
2006 - Brisbane - 58%
2009 - Melbourne - 58%

As a Wire fan, I've never even been to Old Trafford, I had to look it up on Google. Why would he RL world begrudge us that ? We've struggled and failed and won and lost, we've entertained, frustrated and angered. We deserve our moment in the sun.

I think you have too much time on your hands.

Translates as

I have no comeback after being owned

There speaks someone who knows what its like to be detested.

For the record I also want a Wire win.

On the contrary, I'm busy preparing for saturday. I believe you have no such worries.

Huge difference between winning around 60% of your games in the competitive NRL and winning around the same percentage in SL given that 10 out of 14 of those SL teams are whipping boy SL rabble.

But you already know that

I'm well versed in terms such as whipping boy SL rabble, flat track bully etc

But the point is still relevant. If the NRL isn't "ruined" by a GF winning team losing so many games then neither is SL. Despite any relative difference in quality between the leagues.

Quality over quantity every time for me.

Each to their own

What a charmer, writing off the entire populations of one large city and one large town. You should go into politics.