[url=http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/9490230.RFL_s_surprise_swoop_to_buy_Odsal_Stadium/WELL SAID[/url
[url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29258/cash-problems-for-bullsIT'S NOT LIKE YOU NEED MORE THAN 35 YEARS[/url
[url=http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/local/localbrad/11134968._Firm_behind_Bradford_Bulls_owed___1m_and_had_just___750_in_the_bank_/TO MAKE THE SPORT LOOK LIKE A[/url
[url=http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/11448458.Creditors_owed___2m_by_collapse_of_Bradford_Bulls_Holdings__new_report_reveals/SMALL TIME LOCALISED HOBBY[/url

Tinkler is an exception to the rule. He is an eccentric to put it mildly, not to mention being of similar physical construction to Nigel Wood..

A better example would be the News Corp ownership of the Cowboys, the Storm and the Broncos over many years. They have now sold their interest in all but the Broncos. Those private ownerships have hardly gone badly for the clubs one would think.

The Gold Coast Titans could do with a billionaire benefactor as well.

The Broncos have had Branson for christ sake they don't come much bigger or successful than him

They've also had Brisbane Broncos own them

Oh yes, that's exactly how it works.

From what I understand, Richard Branson dropped his ownership of the London Broncos because he couldn't abide the coaching of Anthony Rea (aka "Tony Ray"icon_wink.gif.