Exhibit A:

Now exhibit A has invested an estimated £16,000,000 since 2008, taking London from a 7th placed SL club with Northern Clubs sniffing around our young prospects, playing out of a purpose built Rugby Ground and with about 4,000 fans..........to 660 fans, 7th in the 2nd tier and homeless AGAIN at the end of this year. That figure again....£16,000,000


Exhibit A has had help from key employees during this tenure. As CEO Blanchard was clueless, but made his replacement MacKay look like Bill Gates by comparison whilst 3 key coaching appointments by Hughes were Powel (19% win rate), Rea(32%) and Grima(11%).


Having money (and the exact level of investment by the good Dr is nowhere near that of Hughes.....did I mention the £16,000,000) is not enough. Koukash has blamed everyone for the failings at the club and until he employs a decent CEO to run the business, he'll continue to fail and blame everyone else.

Someone's "100%" is a variable thing. It varies with numerous factors both physical and mental. In the same way as a clubs conditioners are there to prepare the players to get the most out of them (predominantly) physically, a clubs leaders are at least partly responsible for the mental side of things. If you want a player's "100%" to be higher then treat them well and get them to "buy in" to the club. If you want to treat players like sh|t then their "100%" is likely to be lower.

It's the same as in any job, if you properly motivate your workforce you'll have a much more efficient and effective organisation than if the only motivation is through threats and negative motivation techniques.

I'd also imagine the vast majority of officers McDermott encountered in the Royal Marines spoke coolly and calmly. They're trained to do so for good reasons.

I have a question then.
In your opinion and based on the factual data available, how much has the improved engagement with the fans (note...not the clique) improved things for the club as a viable professional business.

Please also refer to the number of long term fans on here who have said that if the club move to Trailfinders Sports Grounds, that they will no longer follow them even though they are now apparently re-engaged and to St Joey of Parra in referencing the newfound engagement, as it is he who you hold 100% responsible for the players and fans interacting at the end of a game.

As a Salford fan of many decades, I would like to answer your query. I cannot as I can not make sense of the second paragraph. Please edit it so I can.

For some reason he has copied a post of mine from the london forum......given his recency, I'd suggest a newbie mistake of straight forward trolling.

Thank god for that, I thought I was going to have to prepare for another Salford conspiracy/crisis!!