Doesn't your outrage at this whole debacle and your vehement position upon the use of this particular word identify that said word is in your vocabulary whether you would use the word choicely or not?

Have you never said anything you aren't ashamed of?

No he isn't. He's your typical barrack room lawyer who thinks he can outsmart folk with his use of big words and lengthy arguments. He usually wins because said folk get p*ssed off and can't be bothered with the boring t*t.

Yes, it is. It is the referees decision to make.

Homophobia is unacceptable anywhere. Whether it is more or less acceptable the swearing on an RL field is neither here nor there. Its a false comparison you are using to feed in to your victim complex.

I never said that homophobia was less acceptable than swearing and it is deliberately disingenuous for you to pretend I did. Its not a competition and any type of ranking would be entirely meaningless and pointless.

Except in a case where a send off is warranted/expected. If the ref heard it he should have walked him. As a rovers fan I don't have a problem with Weyman being sent off if the ref thought the aggressive language was directed at him. What I do have a problem with is peacock not being walked for exactly the same thing. All fans ask for is consistency. Not hard for refs to know that foul language directed at them equals a send off every time. God forbid we become like soccer with players chasing refs around the pitch! The for the rfl to charge Weyman and not change peacock just rubs salt into the wounds.

I'm not trying to feed anything clown shoes I'm pointing out that refs decide which rules they want to apply when it suits them and in this case Child copped a deaf 'un seeing as we have statements saying he actually heard it. Any fan who isn't being disingenuous (Clearly not you) will admit that the bigger clubs get more decisions like this then the smaller ones.
Thanks however for admitting that refs play fast and loose with the rules although you could have just said that right from the start.

Yes refs do decide which rules to apply and when. That is because they are referees and that is their job. To apply the rules as and when they see fit. Did no one explain that to you when you were young?

And yes, children will tell you that their club is on the wrong end of a referees bias. Its how they deal with losing. They can't accept they or their team arent the bestest in the world so they need to find someone else to blame and the smaller teams lose more often.

So i will ask you again, which do you want? The RFL to watch every single game from every single angle and ban every single player they see swearing? or the referees power to send a player he thinks has gone to far from the field?