surely the bigger question is how was mason on 95K a year :O

under the rules, it never mentions that the player is in agreement with the payment, although by accepting the payment they are probably said to have agreed to the compromise agreement / termination payment:

correct:



Therefore if LOD's contract was 200k p.a. but he left after one month of the year (and didnt take any further payment), his 'salary cap value' would be £16,666.

It a club brings a player out of retirement who is on the books as a coach, his entire coaching salary would count as his 'salary cap value' for the year, even if he only pays 5 minutes of 1 game,

You gave that money to the hardship fund actually which wasn't anything to do with the administrator (at that time the club).

That was a fund managed by the Bulls Foundation (a registered charity and separate to the company that went bust and the new company OK Bulls). It helped people pay their rent and put food on their tables while working for nothing due to the club being in administration which was greatly received and a very admirable thing to do.

If you gave it to the club you were actually giving it to the administrator to help pay his funds.

Nope, you've still lost me. What compromise agreement / termination payment are we talking about?

At any rate, it is irrelevant, since it can't be Mason - who would hardly have been taking Shudds to court after he had agreed some compromise payment!

Bulls want Hudds to come up with more cash for Kopczak here :- www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... k/?ref=rss

Bulls want Hudds to come up with more cash for Kopczak here :- www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... k/?ref=rss