Quote ="SmokeyTA"People have a problem with it because at best it is simply naive generalisations, at worst racial profiling.
There arent differences in race and ethnicity, there are differences in individual people, there are some top quality white long distance runners, and some fat, lazy, kenyans.
There is even a clear fallacy in your examples. In sprinting it has been supposed that the 'fast twitch fibres' more prominent in people of West African descent mean those people have a natural predisposition to being better sprinters. The question I would ask is who was the last person from West Africa to win olympic gold?
If people from West Africa have a natural predisposition to sprinting, why out of the 14 men to ever run 9.85sec and below only one from Africa (nigeria) and 13 from North America? Why in Womens sprinting is there not one African in the top 11 fast times ever run, yet there are 8 north americans and 3 Europeans? Why in the 200meters are there as many Italians as West Africans in the 10 fastest times ever run? Why in the Womens 200meters are there 4 Germans but 0 West Africans and 6 north Americans? How have 2 Italians and a Greek won an olympic 200metre title and not one person from West Africa?
Why hasnt there ever been an African 100 or 200 metre Olympic Gold medalist in either mens or womens sprinting ever and only 1 silver medalist (in the 200 frankie fredricks came 2nd twice) yet we have had 6 European gold or silver medalists. The entire continent of Africa's medal haul in olympic sprinting is less than that of Britain.
Since 1972 there has been 5 white European olympic mens champions in the 100 and 200 metres, there has been 0 from Africa. Never mind west Africa.
The fact is, Sprinting is dominated by North Americans, North American isnt a race, it isnt an ethnicity. The reason North America dominates sprinting is because they have the best coaches, the best facilities, a great development programme which is often part of an academic scholarship programme and sprinting is a lot more popular there than it is elsewhere'"
you realise it is because of slavery - right? all the tallest, strongest, most muscular west africans were forcibly removed some 150 years ago. this left a gene pool composed of smaller people to produce the present generations of west fricans. in the carribean and the us however, the black population was almost exclusively descended from the biggest, strongest and fastest people that had ever lived in west africa.
money obviously is a big factor too, and until relatively recently, west african nations could hardly afford to compete in sports tournaments while the usa pours funding into training, facilities, coaching etc. the fact remains though, the us (and carribean nations) are working with a 'hand picked' (horrible to say) genetic group in the first place.