Quote ="vastman"What a load of old sh*te.
Wigan, Leeds and Saints supply the bulk of GB players yet you still manage to blame the three clubs who didn't supply any. This is the twisted logic peddled by SL apologists for years and carries no credibility at all.
Oddly the two British players who stood up best IMO were Ellis and especially Westwood and I wonder where they came from. Take a look at yourselves first.
It's nothing to do with the amount of games, quality of games or number of teams. It's far far simpler, we simply do not produce enough players with the bottle or desire to beat the Aussies and no amount of meddling with SL will change that. As a nation, as a sport and a people we have gone soft and simply can't match the belief and determination of the Aussies who are just better in every aspect.
We were like rabbits caught in the head lights on Sunday - it's absolutely pathetic and unforgivable when you consider nearly all those players have contested SL finals, CCup finals and previous Internationals.
STOP MAKING EXCUSES AND STOP BLAMING OTHER PEOPLE.
'"
I agree! But i do think the lack of competition within our game has a part to play alongside the fact the aussies are years ahead of us, and all we do is copy what they do, by which time they are onto a new thing (a'la Leeds Rhinos trying to adapt the Storms dominance in the ruck, just as the Storm moved on to playing much much faster after the NRL introduced a second referee).
Rugby League isnt out No1 sport, probably not even our second or third, but then football is and we are s*** at that.
Could it be the case that in this country we put so much emphasis on competing at grass roots and in schools, while the aussies focus purely on winning, as do other nations in other sports.