Big well done to the wire, big increase in attendances worth a mention to. They have sold out a few times this season if I am not mistaken. still cant stand that westwood though.

He didn't win back to back titles at Leeds. He left after the first of three-in-a-row to coach England full time.

People often quote the sugar daddy thing in efforts to downplay the efforts of the club. There are quite a few clubs with rich backers, you still need to do all the right things, have the right staff, put the right processes in placem, which is easier said than done!

Quins have a sugar daddy, they're doing well aren't they?

Wire have a brilliant youth squad so i'm not even worried about the future either.

i've got no problems with warrington as a club, they are league winners for a reason, they have a superb coach, some of the top players in the competition and no doubt the best backroom staff, how they accrued them or pay them is of little relevance.
however it's not quite all rags to riches stuff as for the best part of 4/5 years sky have been bigging them up for glory, this year they have found the right combinations to unlock that treasure chest, they have also won 2 cup finals in the last 3 years.what im saying is yes their rise has been gradual but not as unexpected as people might think, lets not forget that they have underperformed quite a bit over the last few seasons too.
while we are on the subject, even though we have no trophies to show for it, our rise from perennial whipping boys to play off regulars and occasional cup finals is also worth noting, yes we are fortunate in that we have ken davy but we have also worked extremely hard to get where we are now.

so well done to warrington,its nice to see a different name at the top after years of domination by so few.

Spot on. Despite having a 'sugar daddy' apparently prepared to pump millions in for years now, we have still had some poor coaches, and shocking signings. As I said in my original post on this thread, money alone can't guarantee success.