Quote ="chukabutt"So you know Rovers fans who thought it was disgraceful about the amount of Aussies a SL team had when we were not even in SL.'"
But it seems many don't seem to mind now. Hence this topic started by you.
Quote ="chukabutt"How many fans do you know that thought it was a disgrace FC were allowed to put Gateshead to the sword to save their own booty?'"
If it wasn't for your club, this wouldn't have happened as we'd have been in NFP.
Quote ="chukabutt"Or how many fans thought it was a disgrace you got to a CC Cup final with unregistered players which believe it or not the RFL gave you dissposition in the next round by just letting you play it.'"
He wasn't unregistered, he was cup-tied.
We didn't field him to cheat. We didn't need to. We played two lower league teams who (no disrespect) would not have beaten us regardless of whether Thackray played or not. We didn't bend rules to play him to get an advantage. We were just stupid. And we were fined (rightfully).
Quote ="chukabutt"The problem I have is when it's suits the fans of the teams it goes for it's ok but when It does not then were poop Aussie wannabees.'"
This is where you are failing to understand. It's not OK if Hull do it. It's not OK when a team someone else supports does it. Nobody thinks it's OK.
Quote ="chukabutt"We are playing by rules your board are not smart enough to understand just as catalan did with Dobbo and wire with Johns.'"
Both totally different and incomparable situations.
You're allowed to deregister players in a season and replace them with others. You're not allowed to re-register them again in that same season. It's in the rules. Rovers found the loop hole that allowed for exemptions. Rovers then started applying for different passports for a number of their players to allow Mason over. And when that didn't work quick enough, Rovers then looked for another loop hole by de-registering Dobson and are now seeking exemption to get him back. They're seeking this. They're intentionally trying to get as many Aussies in as possible. Is this in the spirit of the game? Is this the point of the quota? To allow teams to work around it in as many ways as possible to get more than the quota in? No.
Quote ="chukabutt"
Suppose it's like kids choosing sweets, even though they both have a choice one always what the others got.'"
Yes, it appears everyone in SL wants to be like Rovers and find as many loopholes to get around the quota as possible. Oh wait, it's only Rovers that have been doing it over the years...
Quote ="chukabutt"PS you did also break the cap lol'"
Yes, because our chief executive was an idiot and didn't realise that playing Andy Last for one game would mean his entire salary as a coach at the club would count on the cap. Again, we weren't intentionally trying to get around the rules like Rovers. We weren't doing it against the spirit of the game. We just didn't read the small print.