Not true, close, but not true. People object to Crooksaders lies and and the RFL and Dick Head Lewis falling over himself to get you lot in. The spiel about each application being judged equally and fairly etc. Even the most biased Crooksaders fan can't believe that they actually deserved to be "given" their place now. I mean, what in your application have you ACTUALLY followed through with?

From the sounds of this post you have details of the Crusaders license application, as well as those clubs that didn't get in. Would you care to share these with us?

I think you'll find they were all quite public, about this time last year if I recall?

Can't agree with ya, sorry. Sure, there's more than a few folk who are just plain fed up with The RFL's efforts to expand (and frankly, who can bloody blame em!) Granted, there are also a handful who just don't want to see us expand at all.

You're confusing them with all the people - like me - who are all for expansion, but want to see it done properly, fairly and just for bloody once, somewhat successfully!

Celtic Crusaders (as it stands) = Not a very well thought through plan that sooner or later will end up costing the 'orrible heartland clubs a big woj to bail out

the more you post, the more you sound like a complete idiot........

I believe they earned it based on their standing [iat the time the applications were submitted. [/i

What club had a better application, and why?