I was in The Coral stand, looking down and I thought he bounced it which was then pounced on for the try. But I've only seen it once, at full speed

Seriously, change the record FA. Yet again, someone has a difference of opinion and you accuse them of "being on drugs/substances". You are a one-trick pony and it is getting very tiresome now. You DO realise that people are entitled to have an opinion don't you?

It is also a bit low to try and humiliate people by making comments such as these.

Perhaps you are missing Adey to help you wear people down?

And I'm entitled to have an opinion on their opinion.

That's the bit you miss.


No, it's not, you need to look up "sarcasm".


Your other problem is that if any post is made in response, to anything that response always equals "trying to wear a person down". I find this a very strange concept. Someone else posts - that is never, to you, wearing anyone down. But I post - that IS, somehow, trying to wear someone down. Even by your standards of "logic", isn't that a bit contradictory?

Anyhoo, trying to work out WTF you're on about is wearing me down, so crack on.

You two argue like school children as I have seen previously - is that normal for this forum?

I shouldn't get drawn in, but he keeps piling in with this gratuitous chip-on-the-shoulder shoite. I try to ignore it but ...

You could just put him on your block list

I really didn't take any offense at his post, I thought it were a little bit funny if I'm honest. The only way I may have taken a bit of offense is if I thought his opinion carried any weight.

unfortunately yes. If you decide to stay on this forum you will appreciate that its not Eddie arguing with FA, but FA indiscriminately arguing with anybody in sight, and that casts a shadow across the forum that the "light touch" moderators refuse to lift. Woe betide the fresh new optimistic Bulls poster that makes a slight error even in grammar, FA will be straight down your throat. He knows everything, except what a Bullanker he is. A Bullot on the Fanscape.

And he admits he has no sense of humour. Add together the biggest volume of postings on this forum by FA and no sense of humour, equals run for your life Dr Feelgood, go join the Saints or Leeds (oops maybe not) forum. Or be prepared for venomous contempt from Far and Away up the Spectrum for an innocent comment.

The recent reference on this forum to Adey being a Bullmchum of FA is unfortunately misplaced. Adey is far too emotionally intelligent to be an FA Bullmchum, which is why he has not made a single post on this FA dominated forum for a long time. Remember, his Adey Icon was a FATroll-spray.

unfortunately Greg the issue is weight. if you are not in the FA clique you have to put up with the quantity and quality of his stream of Bull aimed at anyone in his sights. It really does get a bit wearing. And of course not challenged by his Bulmchums the moderators.

supreme irony. FA is the champion of the block list, but check out his responses. As I said Dr Feelgood, there's a load of FA's Bullmchums on this forum.

and the reason they are his Bumllchums? because the quantity and NATURE of his posts are so bloody wearing that if you cannot moderate him, join him.

Not for me.

Just to address the balance, I do like FA's considered posts about the Bulls team and the way they have or have not played. If only he would stick to that, and confessing he has no sense of humour.

It is the quantity and emotive quality of your posts FA that are so destructive to genuine debate (=wearing people down) on this forum. You have admitted you have no sense of humour, so now perhaps it is time for you to admit that you have no self awareness, and that you obsession with being a winning solicitor has no place on a forum that is supposed to be about discussion and debate about the Bradford Bulls.

As soon as you accept that you argue for arguments sake, the sooner this forum will be free of a TROLL.

So, VBFG, statistician supreme, can you please do an analysis of who is the biggest poster on this forum, and also - if you can cope with such a challenge - the emotive quality of their postings. Get what I mean, volume as one factor times emotion as the other factor. The emotive dimension is clearly a difficult one, but I would suggest that you use negative comments as a -10 and positive responses as a +10, and see where you get. Bulliac should be on that basis a resounding NIL. which is a compliment to him: if only he had the b=#FF0000ulls to impose his balance on the Fing Aholes of this forum.

Block list? Mine reads: "No foes currently defined"

Well, I find you funny, so my sense of humour must be working, but at least I'm not a homophobe, ("Bullmchums", ffs)

That's all I will restrict myself to replying to your offensive polemic, as (1) I don't think personal abuse is the way forward, (2) I have no wish to personally abuse you and (3) and I'm struggling to see how you think your personal vendetta relates to Bulls -v- Batley.

The mods can, I'm sure, speak for themselves, and I'm sure will pull their moderating socks up, now that you've set them straight. I do look forward to their views on the Fing Aholes of this forum, in the meantime, here's one for you to be going on with

I carry more weight than you could possibly imagine

The response from FA proves the point.

check out point 3 everybody, how has FA's vendetta against Eddie on the previous pages of this thread got anything to do with Bulls V Batley? you really are a hypocrite FA. this is what is meant by your overbearing oppressive attitude.

Shame you cannot understand a metaphor. Of course you are not bullgering the moderators and your other Bullchums, stupid. Its a METAPHOR. Makes me wonder, if you cannot understand a metaphor, quite where you are mentally? No homophobia in me, but I do dearly suspect you suffer from misanthropy.

And the really definitive response to my comments was: no comment. And yet you could not resist it, you had to have your say, and prove me and Eddie right. Moderators please take note.

So, Dr Feelgood, that is just a normal discussion with FA on this forum. Not nice. If you want to avoid the invective from FA, then make your posts completely bland and innocuous, otherwise EVEN THOUGH YOUR ARE A BULLS FAN, FA will be after you. Just check back through the threads.

of course you dont have anybody on your block list despite recommending it to others on numerous occasions, that is because you just want to argue with anybody you can. Come on, admit it, the only reason you are on this forum is for an argument, you cheapskate, you solicitors should be able to afford the Monty Python Argument Clinic fees

This is a forum about the Bradford Bulls. What weight can you possibly carry that is more than any other Bulls fan can imagine? Or are you carrying your private life problems into this forum?

In which case, dump them on your private life problems, not us Bulls fans.

Well, I had thought that, but you just seem to want to have a go, for some odd reason.


I was referring to my godlike physique




To be fair, i did resist it, until approximately your 78th consecutive direct flame at me.



Now go to bed, and sleep it off. You might be more amenable in the morning.

I doubt it, but you might.

Me and Eddie are actually good mates, so try again!

F A & M E are like one of those long time comedy duos, each needs the other to perform, but as neither is a natural straight man they have struggled occasionally, but along comes the perfect contributor in Martin WildBull who unknowingly fits that bill perfectly!

Remember Fellas The Show Must Go On (As I'm sure stage managers Bullseye and PumpityPump will ensure that it does)

I think this has run it's course now.

Reading back through the last few pages was frankly a pain in the behind. If posters don't cut out the personal attacks there will be warnings and bans. You're grown men so please act like it.