Stats dont mean nowt mate but thanks for showing me them, its obvious they dont mean owt to the coach, but the coach thinks Griffin is a better player than Lynch thats why Griffs in 1st class on friday and Lynch int.

So you're justifying one game against Cumbria as not being enough to be picked?

I'm not being funny but if we went on that system for Darell Griffin, he wouldn't get in the U13's team.

Where do you get this nonsense from?

Where are Gleeson, McIlorum, Chris Riley, Nick Scruton, Jon Clarke, Ryan Bailey, Andy Lynch, Richie Mathers, LMS, Richie Myler et al then based on this guff assumption?



So have many of the above. Be consistent in your standpoint.



Are you Marty McFly?



Again, wrong. But don't let that stop you.

And for 99% of League watchers, Darrell Griffin is nothing more than a journeyman. But then maybe Fartown like that. As England fans, it doesn't thrill us.

Stats don't mean anything?

You wouldn't want a prop to make more metres, more tackles, more offloads, miss less tackles and give away less penalties?

And as for McNamara's selections, they say nothing about the quality of the player's - he signed & continued to play Sheriffe, Worrincy, Reardon etc.

Apart from the young wigan hooker all the others have had a go and failed end of story.

Gurus you missed Lawrence,Mason,Patrick,D hodgson,oh but they were Giants want they.

Thanks for your thoughts lads but i am going now still got some stuff to pack for friday.

that's one well fed troll.

I wonder how Boyd2's opinion can be formed having only seen a maximum of half of Huddersfield's games this year. Since the chances of him being one of those 5 Giants fans that can be @rsed attending non-semi-final away games are fairly remote.

Given your lack of rationality, evaluation of evidence to the contrary and clear inability to construct a coherent sentence, it's probably for the best

Lots of stats i notice that you left out one

metres per carry Lynch 6.07 Griffin 6.7. If you are purely going on stats does that make Griffin 15% more effective than Lynch, therefore is Griffin better

I was in a rush so I only used the ones on the SL website, I didn't do any calculations.

I'm not suggesting going on 1 stat alone, i'm suggesting going on a combination of all the stats.

Griffin - less errors, better mpc

Lynch- more offloads, less penalties, more metres, more carries, more tackles, less missed tackles.

Only an idiot would think Darrel Griffin is better than Lynch. Hardly surprising Macca has picked him. FWIW though I dont think Lynch is international standard either.

Explain ya self Gurus

dont fa get mate am a frontrower

Keep ya chins up lads i hear you are getting some Quality props next year ,eeer him from Saints ,eeer ya know oh whats is name again, eeer oh well never mind.

Been on the old cider lollys?

You be careful now, don't want you hurting yourself.

whats his name.

James Graham.

Been on the cider lollys,no mate been on mad monday.

And Hudds fans dared to question why nobody wants them to win anything. They get like this when they finish 5th, imagine how bad they'd be if they actually won something?

I dont think i will live that long!!

They might have to hire a mini bus instead of a normal taxi for the fans that come over to Odsal

I see Macca is carrying on with his innovative training techniques.



Although I have to admit, what relevance a fear of flying,heights or water , has to a rugby match escapes me at the moment

He's full of crap mate. He does all this team bonding crap and it never works. the thing what bonds teams is hard work, getting out of ruts and coming through strong the other side. Not going sailing in the sun or go karting or bleeding climbing on adult climbing frames.

I know that mick, was the sarcasm in my post a bit too subtle?