I did consider that possibility earlier!

AF and FA are creating random accounts to alter the vote

edit

I am 6 Iestyn 6.

Is this poll legally binding then? Are the board going to act on the results?
I had better get voting then.

edit

There is, of course, always the chance that some of the people who have given up posting (much) on here - you'd need to ask them why - nevertheless still voted. I used to. The OP only asked anyway for comments from those who selected option 5. It seems to me quite likely that the most passionate views are held by the proponents of change, the vocal ones who post on here.

Shush

Is it to do with the fact they can longer think up any defence of our current coach's failings.

macca to stay

edit

Having arrived back in the UK after spending nearly a year in China(not the easiest of places to keep up to date with Rugby)I just can't understand how McNamara is still in a job.

May well be.

Then again, it may be that they got fed up with the way everything got hijacked by the NT - at least that's what a few have told me is the reason.

And again, maybe its because they just think the debate and discussion on here is a load of crap anyway - one guy I know, who feels strongly that Macca HAS to go so he's an NT with bar, told me on Friday night that's why HE does not post.

Or maybe its cos some spell-checking and grammar-checking pedants jump on anyone whose communication skills are far stronger orally that in trying to type? One guy I know told me that was one main reason (he's in the PT).

Or maybe its because they are like so many in life, content to let others put their heads above the parapet.

Or maybe even because some of them have a life...!

edit

Maybe because they simply think that Option 1, which states:

... is a self-contained, open-and-shut option, which says all it needs to, and doesn't actually require a "Why"?

Maybe the problem is more that they have not voted the way those with an agenda expected them to vote? After all, we haven't seen anything like all the 55 (so far, assuming no multiple aliases) who voted options 2-4 giving their reasons either. Isn't that odd, given that you'd expect those who want to change something would make far more noise than those who do not?

Never mind though, its like the EU and Ireland over the EU Constitution - sorry Lisbon Treaty, silly me - if the voters do not come up with the required answer, just keep making them vote again till they do?

I was torn between 2 & three, but I went for look for another quality replacement. I don't mean as in publicly or anything, I just mean that if the right coach becomes available we should take a gamble.

This keeps getting mentioned a lot but who do we think is who. I always used to think Honourbull was you Adey.

It is/was.

Very possibly this is the case.

It is just the case if I wanted to defend my teams coach in the face of adversity amongst a growing number of dissenters because I think he is doing pretty damn well under the circumstances, then I would state my case for the defence.

Should that be a semi-colon after but, rather than a comma?

That's how you see things and people/personalities are all different. Nowadays I generally don't join in the fray and tosh that some post on here about how "they know" what to do to resolve the current difficulties. That's not because I can't promote an valid point/counter claim, it's just that generally I can't be ar$ed / don't have the time that some seem to have. All power to them - it gets their posting figures up / gets them [iknown[/i.

I can categorically confirm that to my knowledge (PM's et al) that there have been at least 5 (now ex) regular posters from here <and the old Bulls MB> that have simply had enough of not being able to make a simple/harmless comment about how they view things without "[ihaving someone else's view rammed down my throat, time and time again and with not too little sarcasm or vitriol[/i".

Coming on here for a chat around RL or The Bulls can now be a hazardous, and some one argue stress inducing, pastime. Some poster excel at being good at dancing around the margins of the AUP

edit

After but what?