Langley and especially lynch are doing more minutes now then they were couple of yrs back, longer you`re on pitch more tired you get, more tired you get you drop off tackles.

Frank Bruno mode <Where's Hari?> =whiteObviously the forwards didn't lay a platform.

Both are doing more than they were in 05 but not so sure about whether they're doing any more than they were in 07 or 08. Lynch has been doing long stints for ages.

Just goes to show how important it is to have a decent set of subs.

Correct. Saves me typing it again,

but its going to come up on all these rumour/recruitment threads until we get an answer.

I agree and as for Lynch, playing with 4 props in the 17 would help rather than 3 and rotating a back rower which is what we've done so much. Langley gets through a tonne of work and has obviously been used differently over the past few seasons which is why he appears to have not kicked on from his early promise, he's still a very good player for us IMO.

And as for the topic I would not welcome signing Bailey, he's not as bad as some are making out by a long shot and would do a decent job for us, but IMO he's not what we need at the mo and I'd rather sign an impact prop and concentrate on getting another junior product to step up in the front row rather than have Bailey blocking someones prospects.

If tis signing happens, i'm noit going to bulls next year, Bailey is the most talentless and cheap shot and we've already got a s*** leeds prop in Scruton so we don't need another and he ain't even good enough for super league if we sign we are in desperation he is the worst prop in supetr league we need class not cheats who have no talent.

Ffs whens school hols finish, scruton s***?, he`s been playing better than lynch.

Don't feed the troll, old boy!

I hope this rumour is untrue

He's definitely trolling, and it wouldn't surprise me if he's a Leeds fan. Scruton has been class this year -bar a few games- and he shouldn't need to be criticized for much.

I think you start from the premise that anyone who either tries to incite fans to boycott games or says he/she/it will be so doing is either a troll or an [iagent provocateur[/i. Especially when their grammar and spelling is inconsistent. This one looks a bit familiar.

Of course, there is always the outside chance that a genuine poster is indeed such a complete wally - even if its likely well past their bedtime...

Well sorry but I disagree he's been an immense disappointment for me. Granted he's been better recent weeks but he still hasn't his Leeds heights.

Do you not think playing in a successful side of champions may have helped him look a little better than playing in a failing Bradford side. IMO he seems a confidence player so will have been struggling this year!

Confidence has nothing to do with effort.

I've been dissapointed with Scruton also.

Scruton has been one of the only decent performers in the second half of the season. He was never brilliant at Leeds, but it would be expected to be a little worse in a side lying 12th ni the table. His mpc has only gone down by 0.1 aswell from last year.

took a few games to get going but now putting some good work in. We got the good one in Scruton no need to go after the other one

Ok but how about a dominant pack, creative players and a decent gameplan?

Sounds familiar.