The RFL Disciplinary panel will decide
End of.

For something to write about, if you had won by 70 this page wouldn't exist.

The one on Crookes by Seymour.



Well done on resorting to name calling and swearing.


Not sure what you are referring to here.



True, don't think I or any other Bulls fan would dispute that.

It's only a dangerous tackle if the tackler raises the legs himself, Seymour didn't.
The momentum came from his upper body being driven into the ground.

The position he was tackled, momentun shift, body weight, reaction.......your not getting it are you
It wasn't classed as a spear tackle as he wasn't " speared", he got a good hit, got hurt , reacted............

Your making a mountain outa a mole hill mate

By Seymour. Therefore Seymour caused his legs to raise.

At the end of the day, no player was badly injured it should have been a penalty but it wasn't and made f all difference. I think we should be debating the Jeffries sin binning more!

It was a penalty.

So everytime the legs go above the head you think it's a penalty?

youtube "De Belin Thaiday"

ok

Ben deliberately took Briscoe out of play so that the defense could get back in line

professional foul and should be penalised more often, wished they had the balls more often to do this

So from now on I should expect every tackle that causes a players legs to raise above the head to be penalised? Even if the tackler didn't touch them?

I'm as clueless as our defence tonight. Its been a long day, emotional rollercoaster etc

Yeah, if you want players to be protected from neck injuries.

You could quite easily pick someone up in a wwe style piledriver without touching their legs and they'd go above the horizontal. It would just be momentum though so its fine.

Mate, you're starting to talk utter bollox now, so I'll leave it there.

I think BJ thought like i did that the tackle wasn't complete as the ball carrying arm was still free. He set a precedent early on in the game for which we should have some more yellow cards by his ruling. He completley lost the plot.

It wasn't a spear tackle. It was a penalty according to the rules because he did go over horizontal. It was the momentum of the tackle that took him over rather than a malicious attempt to injure the player. Seymor was right it goes on all the time in NRL but in SL it gets penalised, thems the breaks. Crookes lashed out but people often do when hurt, its a mans game. If it had happened to a Hull player I would have been up in arms about it at the time but on reflection realised it wasn't that bad.

The only thing dirty about the whole incident were the punches thrown by your player.
I find your sense of outrage very amusing.

This.

Odd, seen as i'm not outraged in any way.

Stop feeding the trolls.

If your not outraged, then you're doing a pretty good impression of someone who is.
You've been going on about a tackle that was not a spear tackle for an hour and a half now, the ref made a mistake in your teams favour, you have nothing to be upset about.

neck? quite clear to see numerous times that the bulls player landed on his back!

Discussing rugby on a rugby forum for an hour and half whilst i'm on the internet anyway ....outragred.


Where's this upset bit come from? Do you just like naming random emotions?

Not as random as outragred.