Which is what I have been saying for long enough. TBH, to expand slightly, it is the big game mentality of McNamara that is in question. Fair enough to say that Leeds and Saints are better than us but Wigan are not neccessarily, Salford in 2006 was a shocker too and it seems that he spectacularly fails when the going gets tough. (CC semi last year, Wigan play-off 2007 for example).

Glad to see you have caught up.

...takes me a while but I always get there in the end!

Why should it in 2006 we beat Saints and Leeds once since then it's 1 win in 2 seasons against both of them.

Question time for Bulls fans www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_fans/

Question time for Bulls fans www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_fans/

..and like everybody else, I'm struggling to see how they'll explain the inept performances we saw last year or what Mr Duffy will get out of this.

Afterall, it isn't yours or my fault that we have a coach who

a) failed to motivate his squad
b) tactically masterminded our worst season for how many years
c) brought in poor signings and then awarded them with 3 year deals (Platt)
d) could only defend his poor tactical choices and game plans by blaming officials

or a club that

a) has failed to acknowledge last year as a failure
b) seems to have no interaction with fans apart from a fans forum
[size=42
(This post is tongue in cheek btw, I will be at the fan forum and will also be getting my away shirt next week)[/size

As you have done throughout RER. It will certainly be interesting to hear what they have to say.

Except I presume to you, since your mind is as closed a book on the subject of the Bulls as a book that has been nailed shut, superglued together and pressed under a ton of concrete. They could get Barack Obama, Billy Graham and Abe Lincoln to speak, it would make no difference to you, so what's the interest?

Nothing you have got to say certainly.

e) has turned year on year losses which would have lead to to the bankruptcy of the club into consecutive years of profit.

f) has turned around years of under investment in the youth system.

g) has reduced by almost half the clubs reliance on overseas players.

h) has resolved a disastrous legal dispute with Leeds Rhinos without losing any of our best young players.

i) Has finished in the play offs despite losing 2 out of the 3 best players in the country to our fiercest rivals.

*pulls back the rods and reels him in..* (psst, check the smallprint)

Quote ="BradfordServiceCrew"Question time for Bulls fans www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_fans/'" There are some astute comments on that article

Quote ="BradfordServiceCrew"Question time for Bulls fans www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... ulls_fans/'" There are some astute comments on that article

There still remains the mystery of your temporary reform, some time just after the Quins away game IIRC. What happened there? Reminds me a bit of [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agatha_Christie#Disappearancethis[/url, though I'm not sure why.

+1

TBH I am puzzled as to why the likes of you and your fellow club parrot (and anagram of you) FA are so obsessed. OK, I was prepared to cut the coach a bit of slack but the bigger picture just does not lead to believe that he is anything else but incapable of coaching our side competently. By all means copy this out toname and shame me at the fans forum (you too Mr Duffy) because there is no reason to suggest that we are going anywhere else but backwards under Steve McNamara.

His 2009 recruitment is questionable TBH and I just have no confidence in him whatsoever. As I have been saying for a while now, he will soon prove me 100% correct.

[iWe're[/i obsessed?







This from a man who has now made pretty much THE self same post, changing the odd word here and there, but saying pretty much the same thing, since the early Middle Ages?

Well, you should know about obsession, that's for sure!

Sorry, I couldn't read it.

And tiny print still isn't irony.

Who said it was ironic? It was a deliverate attempt at trolling which seems to have worked.

The fact that you could see a very small piece of something there would indicate that you either couldn't be bothered to attempt to read it and would therefore try to be clever or you didn't know how (by either using your operating systems magnifier tool or enlarging your browsers font size).

Either way, it was a deliberate windup and trolling attempt. Some of my points were my opinions, some weren't. Move along..

So totally pointless then?

Look pal. You made yourself look stupid. Trying to backtrack and deflect the blow is a bit futile TBH.

I do indeed. Hence why I recognise YOUR obsession.

You've caught a whopper.

Whoah there, no obsession and no attack intended. I thought the Agatha Christie reference would have underlined the intended jocualrity. Just genuinely interested what happened to make you sympathise with SM for a short while there.

As for the parrot jibe, I've never heard Hood or Duffy compare McNamara to Clement Attlee (or Barack Obama

). By the way, do you think Attlee was crap? Or do the circumstances in which he became PM have to be taken into account? Just you've never said...

Being caught out over denying what that you called SM McBanana must have hurt but this is desperate even from you.

Paul Cullen