I would have said 4 back before today but now we won that one, I think 2 back.

Conspiracy theorist me? Never!

You may well be right, but, TBH, I would take it. Anything is better than nothing and to pull back 4 points on Wakey in a few days would be a massive boost.

Our side, when fully fit, is a DECENT side, and I believe that we are capable, with a bit of luck on the injury front, of getting a few more wins. Look at Hull KR today FFS, they ain't much cop, and neither are their nearest and dearest in B&W. Salford are too much of a collection of individuals and they must be seen as a "game to target".

Ferguson, Blythe and Fakir back are massive boosts. Get Kearney back and Gaskell back to the halfs and we should pick up a few more points.

That said, no doubt we will lose another five to injury again this week.

Any evidence of this mythical £1m?
Any evidence of this mythical legal case?
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.

Well if we get our 6 points back, Wakefield will need a new sewage works with all their fans ting themselves, and talking e on here.

Any evidence off any of your claims? I'd suggest your the one who's done. Your just too thick to admit it.

Hopefully they give us six points back. This calling Carter's bluff. Fingers crosse he's a man of his word and not just the gob e i think he is and we dont have to listen to him going on and on kissing his own on radio leeds again.

What did he say? The usual?

Well, yes. If you're a creditor, you will have been already given the evidence. If you're not a creditor, you can ask Mr Wilson and see what he says. Or you can wait for his final report to be published. I don't know of any other options for you.

Not playing your stupid game. Anything specific you want to discuss, feel free.

No. I stated, unequivocally, that legal action is being taken. It is not a claim, it is advising the forum of the factual situation.

No, I can tell you, but choose not to. You are informed. Whetehr you personally choose to intake the information, or not, is up to you. What is stupid is for you to keep claiming the contrary, when you do not actually know anything.

No hearing yet scheduled.

I have told you the facts. You choose to dispute them, even though you don't know the facts. That is as previously remarked a strange case of repeatedly sing in the wind.

As I have individually called you a liar on specific points, and you have simply ignored it, I suggest you go back and requote the individual accusations of each of your lies, and refute them, if you really want to look more foolish. Your tactic of deliberately ignoring specific statements and then some time later disingenuously asking "what statements" is frankly pathetic.

How long before we know the outcome of this weeks hearing ?
Will we have to wait further or will it be announced straight after ?

I doubt there will be an official announcement on Wednesday, my guess would be Thursday or Friday with lots of our resident in the know experts claiming to know the result Wednesday evening.

:23uilwcn

Well, they'll all know what the result [i:23uilwcnought[/i that is for sure! 'Course, it would get a bit boring if it were otherwise.

do any of the resident in the know experts know if the Independent Panel have asked for an expert to provide evidence to help them with their decision as allowed by the appeal process. If so, there should not be much delay. quote from rfl website 14th April:

[iThe panel has the discretionary power to instruct an independent firm of accountants or alternative expert to provide evidence to assist them in deciding whether or not the insolvency event arose as a result of force majeure.[/i

If they haven't, it could take a bit more time to appoint and consider the evidence of such an expert. So you would have thought they have, but then nothing about this is straightforward.

The decision is supposed to be announced the week after the hearing,wonder if that date will get pushed back to August

Nothing would surprise me, not even if it were pushed back until after our game away at London. That's our final match, to save anyone looking it up.

Now that [icould[/i be a political hot potato..

Surely a more equitable solution to the requirement to reduce the number of teams in SL rather than the totally arbitrary method based on league position would be to relegate all teams beginning with W. Some unfortunate collateral damage - sorry Wolves fans but I am sure you will bounce straight back - and it will greatly help sell the game to Japanese TV

The RFL are appointing independent announcers to make the announcement.

if we had not had the 6 points deducted at the start of the season we would still be in 13th place, would we still have the coaching staff we have now, would Sammut, Scruts, and Cavel have left.

food for thought

But first, they will use their discretionary power to instruct an independent firm of experts to provide evidence to assist them in deciding who are to be the independent announcers.

If we still had Sammut, Scrutes and Carvel, we would more wins than we have currently posted

You can't say that. We have no idea what would have happened has BB2014 not felt bounced out. Who knows who would have left? Impossible to say, but as dayvez says had we kept something like a pack I'm sure we'd have had more points in the bag.

I was in Leeds station Wetherspoons on Friday, as were Big Nige & Ralph. Unlike me they were on a table of lovely ladies. It's strange what comes into your head after 6 pints of Acorn's splendid [iSur Votre Velo[/i. I went home instead & slept through Wire v Rhinos.