All this in fighting isn't very edifying is it?

You're all grown men aren't you?

Let's give it a rest please.

Mr. Moderator, can I just point out that I am (once again) complying with what the moderators have requested. The personal attacks are totally one-sided, and getting more than a bit irritating now.

(Edited as per Feeble's advice below.)

Might help your case if you didn't refer to mods by their first names, Adey. Makes nutty Eddie's accusations sound more plausible and its a little funny how you've suddenly started doing it.

?? I've always done it with Sam, from time to time, nothing new there. As I have with our friend Craig too, from time to time. I guess since I use my own first name on here, the thought never entered my head about what you suggest. Don't really see anyway why I should have to make "my case", though. House divided...all very sad.

So, when a deal was signed to buy OK's shares, how was it negotiated and agreed? Accidentally? It is an odd thing, that. To agree to buy someone's shares for £300K when you have no intention of doing so. Perhaps you could explain how that one works?


One of us is a perpetual liar, and as I have said, it isn't me. This particular mistake of yours, which you keep repeating, PROVES you to be a liar. Why? Because you don't say you simply "don't know of" any case, or that you've not heard of the case. You bluster that "THERE IS AND NEVER WAS" a case. And accuse me of perpetuating "a lie". No room for doubt, then. You are telling the forum that YOU KNOW, and therefore you know I "am lying".

So let me tell you the case details. It is - and has for very many weeks - been proceeding in the High Court at Leeds under case number A30LS219. In fact, oddly enough, OK started these legal proceedings at the time that he publicly announced in the local press that he had started these proceedings.

You have been a busted flush for a while, but your gamble on your wild guess that there was no case has failed, and you are a now proven LIAR. Well done you!


The remainder of your lies, like the above, can therefore be safely ignored as the invented product of your febrile imagination.

But it isn't is it? The RFL clearly stated one of the reasons for not accepting the financial bid & forecast was because there was no investment funding going forward.

Moore & then Whitcut both failed to detail what their plans were, but both chose to blame the RFL. That's afar wasier than actually talking figures and admitting they had no money to invest.

The same people signed on as directors at OK Bulls and had allegedly agreed to purchase the shares of OK Bulls from Khan. They then found, miraculously, financial transactions that one of the directors who had been running OK Bulls knew nothing about?

I think wh\t you'll find is Khan left Whitcut with the job of off loading the business asap. He almost pulled it off, but when the irregularities came to light they backed off. Khan realising his plan had been rumbled played the victim and said he was going to take legal action. He never did and hasn't.

The big difference you don't seem to understand is that the RFL were able to step in to vet purchasers pland once the business was in admin.

Prior to admin the only test was fit and proper as it would be the only influence they could have.

Oops! You LIED again

What's up troll - cat got your tongue?

For the avoidance of doubt, Moore told me and others personally some months ago that Khan had instigated a legal action against him and Whitcu*t over failure to proceed with the share purchase.

But he clearly must have been lying, since LiarDweeb assures us - categorically and unequivocally - that no such action was ever initiated.

The deal was agreed based on false information supplied via Whitcut who was still working for Khan.. Once the deception was rumbled, the buyers back ed out & reverted to their original plan.. BB2014 was set up to take over once OK Bulls failed, which it did.

You have said previously there were no details of cases publicly available. Now you are quoting case numbers and courts. Curiously you aren't linking to any court sites where these details can be verified.

YOU are the perpetual liar and troll.

Wait ... what are you rambling about now ... I have previously said that there are no public lists of such civil cases available on t'internet, but you think it's "curious" that I'm not linking to any court sites despite me having explained there aren't any such sites? That is pretty amazingly dense, even for you!

You didn't get sight of any documents? Which solicitor was apparently acting for Khan?

He can't take any more, LiarDweeb has left the building!

So there are no public lists, which begs the question what the number you have offered as a case number actually is? Leeds high court?

£1m? Any proof yet?

Oh grow up. Can you prove that NO action is taking place?

I presume you DO know that FA is a Lawyer? And has been for many years? You?

There are public lists, they pin them up each day on the court notice board.

Tell me though, which bit of

is it that you are struggling with?

Why are you suddenly not so cocksure that there is no case?

And are you going to apologise to me for calling me a liar, and to the forum for spouting bollox claiming it to be fact?

be careful. Are you again accusing me of lying? You want more humiliation?

Here is an excerpt from the T&A report


This has been confirmed to me by someone who was present at the meeting. That would be an odd thing to confirm if it had never happened.

So far as I am aware, nowhere has it ever been denied.

Whereas all you have is your own assertions, and as you are a proven liar, they aren't worth a great deal.

So you didn't get sight of any documents? Just like you said you voluntarily signed an NDA but couldn't confirm the capacity in which you allegedly saw financial information....

Leeds high Court?
Which solitcitor is acting for Khan?
The alleged case number you have a suggested is genuine relates to which parties, i.e who are the named parties in the alleged case?

Answer the question.

And I never said I could not confirm the capacity in which I signed the NDA. I merely said that I would leave it up to YOU to trawl back and find out. Maybe one day I'll make you look an even bigger wassock that you already do, by telling you, and showing you various places where I made it clear. But let's see you dig yourself an even deeper hole first, so I'll have even more fun when I so pìss on your parade that you'll never surface for air again.

Now answer the question.

LiarDweeb, I feel your pain

So you haven't had sight of any legal documents? All you have is what you say Moore told you? The same Moore who says he was misled about the financial state of OK Bulls, and who says he was misled by the RFL?

So you don't want to say in what capacity you saw these financial documents, but want people to believe you signed an NDA?

Are you in the pay of Khan or Moore?

I was wrong. The Black Knight has nothing on LiarDweeb.

I am off to bed, as no doubt he will come on later and say his account had been hacked again.

So the case number you have made up? You can't say who the parties are? You can't say who the solicitor is? You are saying Leeds High Court?

Still nothing on this £1m?

Busted flush.