Well, you could argue they do show regular matches

Once a year (Summer Bash) is [iregular[/i. Just not very [ifrequent[/i

This is my theory, see if anybody can imagine this actually happening

The RFL and the Bulls have known all along we would not be relegated this season, hence no obvious attempts to really strengthen the squad to try avoid finishing in the bottom 2. The RFL knew if they just changed the format at the end of the season and the Bulls did not go down there would be hell on. Now with some championship chairmen, we don't know how many, stating they would not want the Bulls to be relegated, the RFL now have a perfect opportunity to change the format and keep the Bulls in the championship and say it was all the over clubs who wanted this to happen. They would be able to pass the buck onto somebody else and save face. And Big Nige gets to take over a club that is on the up and not in the bottom league

Now does anybody think that is too far fetched to be true

Not far-fetched at all

An even simpler scenario is that they'd decided that next seasons Championship would be 14 clubs, to even up the current 12/14/16 format to 12/14/14 and mean that League 1 can have a sensible format. With the Bulls in meltdown, they couldn't announce it then - because it would have looked like the RFL were massively favouring the Bulls. And Big Nigel couldn't have that, knowing that he was positioning himself to take over the club. So he whispered in Chalmers ear (hence the lack of investment). The rumblings from the Championship chairman simply gives him a convenient smokescreen.

Is that perhaps a bit less far-fetched

You make it sound very plausible put like that.

The answer to your question is at least six.

Listen to my interview with Alan Kilshaw from yesterday.

If it's 14 clubs in both championship and league 1 then the 13 home games works whichever division we're in. Careful what we wish for mind. Championship will have London Toulouse Toronto and still a chance of catalans

But. Chairmen not particularly bothered about results but finances. Looking at the clubs you mentioned the CH clubs coffers are not going to be swelled by away support.

Yep, even if we are somehow kept in the Championship we're not going to be in the top four at the end of the season. Will a mid-table finish bring in enough to rebuild in 2019 and push for a top 4 Champ slot - its a massive hill to climb irrespective of Champ/L1 next season.

However, we'd never get back into SL as the Championship chairmen wouldn't allow it..

I am close friends with someone who is let’s say at the top end of the pecking order at a very local championship team and he has offered to bet me £1000 that bradford will not be relegated, he has specifically said there’s been a meeting and bradford will not be going into league 1, make of that as you will but this is as close as to from the horses mouth as possible

I have heard from the man at the very very top that;

1. the Bulls are definitely NOT getting relegated down to League 1
2. the Bulls ARE definitely getting relegated down to League 1

There; wait till the truth is actually announced - I'll delete one of the above and take the credit for being in the know - simple - no-one will spot the fact that I actually know feck-all

Mick?

Mock me all you want but I did say make of it as you will and simply said it’s what I’ve been told and I don’t treat it as 100% truth just thought I’d share the convo as this thread is directly related to said conversation

But the squad strengthening started to happen when players for 2018 started to become available.

It all fits.

Personally i wish the RFL would do what they are paid to do and run the sport them bloody selves (not the clubs) and enforce the rules everyone signed up for at the start,

Massively this. How much of a joke is it that these sort of comments are even made? Not one other professional sport is run in such an unprofessional manner. I do think Roger Draper is a step in the right direction but it needs a whole heap more

The RFL is effectively made up of representatives from the clubs anyway, so it's pretty much the same thing. Just be thankful it's been streamlined a bit and the RFL committees don't involve one rep from [ievery[/i club as they did in years gone by.

BradfordLadB, I wasnt personally mocking you - if I wanted to do that I would have directly quoted you in my comment.
But we get plenty of first time posters on here who are "in the know".
So unless the cap fits, take a

pill.
We never know, Mr Chalmers himself may be one of the new posters

I am Mr Chalmers

More like Mr. Charmer !!

I created my account specifically to post on this topic that’s the reason for the 1st poster award

I never claimed to be in the know I was just passing on info that I have received like I said “make of it as you will” I don’t 100% believe it if I’m honest but with him wanting to bet me money, who knows.....

Now then Jim, are you alright

Well, he wouldn't be the first club official to do that.

I would take his bet.

I assume he's not quoting odds, just a straight Even money bet.

First, ring your bookie and ask what odds he'll give you for the Bulls NOT to be relegated. I've no idea what you'll get but I'd hazard a guess at 3/1, and say you stake £500

If the Bulls stay relegated you lose your £500 to the bookie but get £1k off your mate.

If they do not get relegated you owe your mate £1k but you win £1.5k off the bookie.

So £500 profit whatever happens.

These opportunities come along rarely. Seize the day.

love it