Quote ="Errol Stock"That about takes the biggest biscuit I've seen for a while..
Can't be bothered disecting as you do. I have an opinion and point of view equally as valid as yours.
You may think your keyboard magically translates your opinion into one that's more valid than mine - but actually you don't..
There have been plenty of people on here who put up with your condescending, supercilious high moral ground postings but I am not one of them.
I disagree with you - that's all - and you are not the flaming Oracle either.'"
FFS. If you don't like people discussing points of view, then why join a forum?
What it was I put that has so got your knickers in a twist I honestly have no clue.
You say you "disagree with me". But you don't say what, and you don't say why, which is odd in itself.
Far from having claimed magic powers or infallibility, you raised some interesting points and so I did you the courtesy of spending my own time telling you my considered opinions on them. I only "dissected" your post because that way it's easy to read comments about individual points. Whichever, I can't imagine why using paragraphs, of all things, could upset a person. If you want to invent tones of condescension or superciliousness or morality that weren't there, then that's your problem. It is a bit weird.
There was no "edge" to my post. But it seems I made the mistake of thinking you were a reasonable person amenable to discussion. I would genuinely have been interested to know what you thought about my points but if you want to fake being professionally offended then I can't do anything about that.