... and I've said it's not. My opinion is as irrelevant as his, since neither of us will be on the disciplinary.


Indeed, just as on this forum. Many of them were "surprised" that Leeds are in the GF not Wigan. But they are. That some folk are "surprised" is, however, also totally irrelevant.




... but you can't get any more irrelevant to the Graham case than that!

Irrelevant or not he's been found Guilty! Details to follow!

Banned for 12 Matchs!

Pretty much what I expected as soon as he was charged.

Well that's that, then. A finding has been made and so he'll have to live with it. Could it be the end of his Aus career I wonder?

Really interested when the reports come out to read what his actual defence case was.

What graham has done is NO different to that animal Elliot whitehead, both should be removed from the game. You can kind of excuse whitehead he's a rough head from wet bowling #scrote

Seriously, how are you still not banned from this forum?

It's not the Wigan forum where dissent, or plain stupidity, isn't tolerated. Give 'em enough rope.

Rope's already quite thin.

I don't think there's much point putting an appeal into the NRL panel. They've judged that he is a biter, despite his protestations of innocence.

If his good name is worth that much to him - he could really burn his bridges in the NRL for good and take his case to the courts. Not been done before. Would probably lose him his job & cost a lot of money. Would change the burden of proof. Would allow a lot more evidence to be heard. Slater would be present.

It'll be interesting to see the report. It may just be media slant but he seems to have been deemed guilty before he stepped before the NRL panel. It was just a formality to go through before he could be hit with a 12 match ban - when the previous bite ban was only 8 matches.

Another keyboard warrior, bet he dare not insult Elliot to his face.

Poor quality trolls aspire to a banning so they can blame the Mods. Much better to let them suffer a 'Varking or an Accounting for a few days, they always retreat under the bridge. It's good sport for us as well.

I knew you went fishing off that bridge!

I suspect some of them aren't the old-fashioned, fluffy sort which get squashed though. The more recent variety seem to be composed of a hard rubber which just bounces back unabashed. I do suspect that, rather than simply resilience, it may be due to a lack of understanding when it comes to words of more than two syllables or even four or five letters..

Funnily enough, I was never a supporter of the rope but as time passes I guess it may have its uses.

I think it is more the same few people with new usernames.

You may well be right with that.

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"There's no video evidence of him biting Slater, though. And as he has pleaded not guilty he obviously doesn't think he bit Slater. It's all analysed in the VT thread, you want to have a read of that.'" In the interests of Justice FA I think the lad was stitched up by the judiciary, even the Hacks are having 2nd thoughts www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6489479242 Using you powers of observation and Legal knowledge do you agree that he was indeed stitched up??

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"There's no video evidence of him biting Slater, though. And as he has pleaded not guilty he obviously doesn't think he bit Slater. It's all analysed in the VT thread, you want to have a read of that.'" In the interests of Justice FA I think the lad was stitched up by the judiciary, even the Hacks are having 2nd thoughts www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 6489479242 Using you powers of observation and Legal knowledge do you agree that he was indeed stitched up??