That is very clever

Also very believable

They may as well go all out and start rewarding bonus points... But only for the other 13 clubs!

Who is going to appeal it NOW? The administrator? Is that his concern?
The deduction was for going into admin, which the bulls did so thats four or six points.
If the new owners once sought offer to pay the existing creditors from the old business i could see the RFL reducing that to four and think that would be fair in the circumstances.
I think that is well within the rules.

What rules?

Regarding penalty points for admin.
As i understand it the RFL need only administer a four point penalty for a club working with its creditors, so i guess reducing the penalty by two points (if that was the case with any new owner) would be within the rules.

Think it is more to do with BB2014 seemingly doing everything the RFL asked and being in talks with them for so long, and then for the RFL to slap a 6pt penalty on the Bulls which far as i can make out took BB2014 completely by surprise.

If the club is worth more with the points than without, then I guess it [iis[/i the administrators concern. The decision to dock the points was always a bit presumtious anyway, since they don't what, if anything, is going to be owed until the new owner emerges. The RFL - [ialways[/i on the ball..

Possibly so, but in fairness to the RFL the speed things were going betweek Omar and the new BOD they had to make a decision at some point and it was dragging on somewhat.
Was it overkill to put off BB2014? maybe it was (personaly i think it was) but it was none the less within their rules.

It depends on what you choose to believe.
The RFL say they are a bunch of flyers with no money which may have taken them by surprise, but we all know that the RFL are a bunch of flyers with no clue...which surprises nobody!

unfortunately none of have seen the proposed financial plan of a) buying the club and b) paying off creditors.
The RFL in the guise of Solly and Rimmer did work with BB2014, but it appears after the full board looked at what was on the table they had a drastic change of opinion, was it after as the RFL state they were not happy with the club being bought by the funds from the central funding and not owners putting in the cash..??

Guess this is what the spat is about and why BB2014 are looking to sue the RFL ....who knows

When was the deadline for the retraction, given by BB2014?

yesterday 16:00

and not much on that since. I presume discussions are taking place?

Just as likely that there is nothing to discuss.

No, the RFL made a brief statement yesterday that they would neither be issuing a public apology or taking the original press release off their website (it's still there), and said they would deal with the matter through their solicitors.

I didn't see that. I guess it's a legal game on now.

Quote ="phillgee"I didn't see that. I guess it's a legal game on now.'" It was one of those "an RFL spokesman said" quotes.... www.totalrl.com/web/rfl-refuses- ... s-dispute/ The original offending article is still on the RFL website.... www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29 ... ford-bulls

Quote ="phillgee"I didn't see that. I guess it's a legal game on now.'" It was one of those "an RFL spokesman said" quotes.... www.totalrl.com/web/rfl-refuses- ... s-dispute/ The original offending article is still on the RFL website.... www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29 ... ford-bulls

The best scenario is for you to go down this season and build the club up again in the new division over the next few seasons. You'll be competing at the top end of that division so the crowds should stick with you albeit you won't be playing the top SL sides but at least you'll be building up a club who gets used to winning again and competing at the top of the league.

You won't need to spend fortunes on players in the hope of staying up /staying in the top league for the new play off system and no pressure will be on you to break the bank on star players like you have done. It might be strange seeing Bradford out of the top division but would be worth it for you if you still have a team to support.

We are more worried about whether there's a way to get through this season to be honest.

Whilst that's maybe not a worst case scenario, it most certainly isn't the best one for us.

Cut your wage bill this season by letting the high earners leave if they wish to do so then bring through some younger players from your academy or like you are doing now bring in loan players from other clubs who could potentially be at Bradford next season. You're still a big club with some pull so players will want to play for you whatever division you are in.

It's not worth throwing money away on good established players in the hope of staying up this season as it just digs another financial black hole for you you don't really want or need. I don't know the ins and outs of your financial troubles at the moment but it's not worth further risking your clubs future by trying to stay up. I still can't believe the potential savours of Bradford walked out after you were hit with a points deduction. Wouldn't it be better building a club up with solid foundations from the bottom instead of fire fighting this season to stave off relegation for short term gain of staying up?

most people think going down is a deathknell, which it most likely is. In all likelyhood the best team from the 2nd league will get a one match chance to get promoted (4th v 5th) of the middle 8 mini league...This will almost certainly be against a SL team that will have a salary cap of £1.85m compared to £1m, going to be damn hard to get out of SL2

They didn't, they had been misled re that (they said) but what did foir them was the decision that despite being brand new owners, they couldn't run the club if they took it over, they would instead have been in special measures. That was what they especially couldn't accept.

Not only a deathknell for the club but, apparently, also financially ruinous for any new owner without very deep pockets

Really such a hardship?