Bring back the mac.

IMHO MBBB is undoubtedly a comic genius and RAB legend . . . . but this does highlight the need to be aware of the sites [url=http://viewtopic.php?t=53321=redAcceptable Usage Policy[/url and the consequences of breeching that.

All of the rules are here for a reason - in this case to stop us getting our a$$e$ sued off / incurring associated costs - [url=http://viewtopic.php?t=53321=red1.2b. Copyrighted materials[/url

[iHopefully[/i the gifted one will be back with us all sooner rather than later . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Nazi.

Seems you cant do anything on here nowadays without breaching the AUP.

Facist!!

Bring back the flying scotsman

Made all the worse when some people who enforce the rules can say what they like about people in their "own zone."

Ve vere only obeying orders!!

Which board does Mintball cover anyway? And why did our moderators not do anything about it? bah - forum politics. We need to see their expense accounts!

It is not a problem with which board she is mainly based, it is comments in the secret moderator zone I was referring to.....

Yes, we're all obviously:-
- Nazi's,
- Fascist,
- Vegans
- and have massive bank accounts (which is, again, obviously why the Bulls can't buy in any more "big" name players)

[size=59(if some of you are going to be daft, I can be dafter - I've certificates in it)[/size

Our forum mods didn't do anything about [i"it"[/i because I, and I assume the others that are about at the mo, don't [ilive [/ion here and didn't see it.

Minball was left with no real alternative.

Mystic ? ? ? ? . . . "She"? Is their some history there then . . . .



Play nicely now everyone or 2.2 of the AUP may well have to be invoked

. . . . (see above four bullets)

How ban you possibly compare yourself with Spock.



Plus don't forget; Whilst we are complaining about you the players are being left alone.

I never said anything about Mintball.

Shame. How she ever became an admin is beyond me - she's the female version of Henry VIII. Say something that defies her own opinion and you're in for a chopping.

Hmmmm. . . . wasn't suggesting you were having a pop or anything



I was referring to your assertion that Mintball was a "she" rather than a "he" and was simply being a little mischievous over my implied liaison. . .


Nothing more.

Let's face it, she has bigger balls than her husband - tb

Don't know who Mintball actually is so I couldn't comment. . . . although I hope Mintball takes your '

's ' as an indication of levity rather than a veiled attempt to make some, possibly, pretty cutting

comment.

You're a brave man P . . . .

Or alternatively, put up a reasoned - and reasonably irrefutable - argument and I've noticed she quietly withdraws and doesn't seek to argue further in reply and tends not to argue the point further on the thread in question. Sensible strategy, I'd say.

So she likes to argue then...

Better add a "

"

Whooooosh . . . . . but still worth a

I am a member of Amnesty International. I feel a new campaign coming on...



Your royal majesty the dictatorship fascistness of RLfans moderation Sir,

We the undersigned demand the immediate release of Macbull, a citizen of this country being unfairly held against his will for the simple crime of unbeknowingly (maybe) breaking the AUP. He is a non-violent victim being held for his beliefs rather than for any crime.

We thank you for your most precious time

Yours

debaser

All sounds fair enough to me

. . . . and I quite like opening address



But what if . . . . . MBBB doesn't [iwant [/ito come back

What's all this cobblers about being sued for posting You Tube links anyway? Where's the steely backbone of the working class, from whence the game originated, and who exactly, in this imagined scenario that so offends the AUP, is going to sue who? I haven't noticed Sky launch a wave of litigation against You Tube where the so-called infringement was posted, nor would they, it would be patently ridiculous, so the idea that posting a link to such material would invoke a law suit is evidently a nonsense. What would be the point, it would cost more than could be recouped in compensation, it could be imaginatively defended (see McLibel) and would bring a wave of bad publicity and righteous ire upon those instigating such action. Hence it aint going to happen.

How sad is it that we cower, like little lambs, in the face of some imagined threat, bleating about others' naughtiness, whilst removing an individual's freedom of speech, a far more serious and odious crime than infringing copyright could ever be.

Bring back Keith before we lose him forever to the Cherry B, solidarity with the work shy and feckless and down with pedantic, power crazed mods!

Brilliant Post...

I salute you sir.