Had me worried there,I thought they had signed Geoffrey .

Geoffrey would stiffen up their defence but the game would go on for five days and end up 0-0.
I will still be going.
I presume the gate is shared or do you keep your own takings?

Would have thought you keep all gate if your a home side tbh. Another incentive for getting extra home game

How does it work for league games?

Fine! We won't miss you and your chip on your shoulder and it looks like Bulls fans won't either.

I wonder how many realise that the original Middle 8s ranking had team 6 (which was Wakefield at that time, as it is now.
because they were unlikely to finish above last in SL) playing team 4 (Bulls) as an away fixture, and also Hull KR as an away fixture. The new one in tablets of stone is a home fixture against both Hull KR and the Bulls, plus I m told now that not only do Wakey get at least 2 plum home fixtures, but a £20k SKY payment! And who believes the statement that each team put £80k into a pot for eventual compensation if they got a SKY game. Is that the pot Mr Carter said they hadn't got to perform a bodily function in at the start and mid season??? Wonders will never cease?

06.09.2015 HKR v Wakefield?
Originally due to play champ winners home, second away.That has switched.

We all said at the midway point of the season that 2nd place was arguably the more preferable finishing position. Logically that should never be the case, otherwise it would be a clear flaw in the system. So the changes made by the RFL were justified imo.

And as far as I'm aware, the £80k put in by all SL clubs was done at the start of the season, so it would simply have been deducted from their central funding. So the referral to Michael Carter's comments doesn't really apply - they never had the £80k to start with.

Well I am so convinced with your arguement that I wonder where the £960k is sitting at this moment, not sure what you mean! Because logicaly the changes only affect Wakefield postionally in the middle 8 matrix, with other teams having to bend their fixtures.Believe me if you compared the matrix it looks highly suspicious to a cynic like what I am.
Are you saying that the RFL agreed that this was changed because of your reasoning?
Perhaps you could mention it to whoever decided to change it, and I suppose Mr Carter never said they were on the financial brink???

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Are you saying they changed the grid just to give Wakefield some cash? Why would they do that, they could have just chosen their matches to be televised anyway?

I am wondering why the changes were brought about, if you are a Hull KR or a Bulls supporter, who may have wished for a home fixture which would have brought more revenue into your club. It would also have given your club an advantage over a club that had finished at the bottom of the SL table, whilst your club had been a lot more consistent, and had not stated that they would give up due to it being better to save themselves for the middle 8, so they had a better chance of going back into super league, you may have felt aggrieved.

But personally I have stopped being over awed with the decisions we have to live with, if we follow RL.

Firstly why do you think it's Wakefield's fault how Super League split up the money?
Second, not supporting your team seems a really bad way to protest against an opposition club.
Third, why do you think the fixtures have changed? As far as I can see we are playing exactly who the RFL said we would play when the grid first came out.
Only the order you play the teams and who was on telly was decided late on.

and they then get some stick - much of it warranted, imo.

Well my friend if you read my original , and indeed subsequent threads. Yo may note that I never apportioned blame to Wakefield as I merely stated facts which are irrefutable> Who said I wasn't supporting my team?
Would I lie to you about the fixture change? Other people can confirm this to your satisfaction, no doubt.
And where did I mention the decision to arrange the televised game was either wrong or right?

The information I gave was factual, with a bit of speculation admittedly, but that , in my opinion, didn't detract from the facts, nor was it critical of Wakefield, whatever I think?

You have turned it into something that suits your feelings on the subject, which is OK, but don't attempt to shoot the messenger.

PopTart the original format has been changed, trust us on this one

Originally the team finishing 2nd in the championship seemed to have the better of the fixtures, which was obviously not right, so the RFL changed it mid season and probably hoped nobody would notice, which is obviously par for the course for them

The title of the thread and comments about Wakefield implied you had issue with Wakefield. If you say not I'm fine with that.
But saying you won't go because you don't want to give money to Wakefield is exactly not supporting your club.

As for the fixtures. Clearly it affected Bradford so you would notice more than me. I was just saying I hadn't seen them change. They don't seem to have for us.

Anyway, let's see how this weekend goes. It would be nice to be watching two teams with 2 points each next week.

PopTart, the fixtures were changed a few weeks ago. Another endearing moment for the RFL.

I understand the sentiment of the OP however I think his choice of action is maybe not correct. Why not go instead and show a protest banner to make your message?

Your team needs your support so to deny it because you have a dispute with the RFL is penalising an innocent.

I agree the funding for these middle 8 televised matches stinks and is unfair.

The RFL always seems to muddle through at first missing the obvious.

In terms of the 80k put in the pot, just have a look at how many home televised matches Wakey have had on Sky this year. Saints and Wigan spring to mind but I'm struggling to think of many beyond that. Crikey even Warrington get more appearances in a month and they've had a shocker of a season so far.

Come on down to the oldest RL ground in the world on Sunday and support your team. You are all welcome.

A band played Rebellion festival this weekend called Geoffrey Oicott. Could we Oicott Wakey instead?

Part of our (Leighs) problem with the Sky funding in the 8's is that logic says 7 weeks and all will get a live tv game 3pm saturday bar Sheffield who have no fans.
So when we get our 2 SL clubs as our first 2 fixtures at home live on Sky it stinks. Saturday crippled us 4500 when sunday would have been closer to 8000, even corporate was shafted as most regulars had booked corporate at Haydock parks big race day months beforehand. Probably cost us £60k we cant afford to throw away

Shouldn't be a problem, your fans' have been doing it for years.

Much like most of your own.

Not quite, just recently.

Your Attendances are an embarrassment

Hi again PT,

May I refute your idea that I won't go to the Wakefield game because I wouldn't want to give money to the club, is ridiculous,to me anyway. I don't ever believe staying away and cutting off your nose to spite your face is the silliest reason to not go to any game!

As for your comment on fixtures, both Hull KR and Bradford are the affected teams, as we both were subjected to a home fixture against team 6 (the 12th Finisher in SL) which was changed to an away fixture. In fact team 6 in every instance was replaced by team 7 (Sheffield). This in no way is any fault of your club? But I asked why, and as supporters shouldn't we have been told by the RFL? If it was a logical reason don't we deserve to be told what it is?

As for the £80k per team, this was never mentioned in the original policy review, and of course the new Sky deal doesn't kick in until 2017, so this £80k either came out of the £300k SL clubs got at the end of 2014, as a parachute payment> but if that was the case why didn't they say so at the time??

My case now rests!

I get the change thing now. I hadn't seen a change but everyone else seems to have so I bow to the greater knowledge.