So did I. You couldn't make up this stuff. I expect they'll gloss over it.

I hear our new rugby director is to be Steve McMascara. Nailed on.

PS Do you think that there would be a market for Bulls Foundation?

From what I understood the stands at Odsal could do with some? or maybe I am misunderstanding



While I cannot comment on cosmetics for Bulls specifically I gather from items in the news recently that several other domestic animals receive extensive "make overs" before reaching our plates!

Well Sammut, Purtell and Heath have had botox treatment could be sign of the times.

Her investmant could be £100k and for her to get alot of shares for that would be daft, if the supporters trust asked for all fans to donate £100 like at the pledge and they then donated that to the Bulls in exchange for shares we could raise 3x that maybe more 3000 donating £100 each makes £300k.

How much did our pledges alone generate or am i thinking along different lines???

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz[del[/del

Psssst! Tigs. Wrong login.

I'm not sure what happened here. Getting to grips with this new format is playing havoc. Anyway, I can't be bothered putting together another erudite post to lose it in cyber space.

I assume she also has jaywilley.com? Some of my cousins and friends used to visit an "Eye brow and nails" salon in Moortown with a Jay Willey.They recognised Jay's name in the press yesterday. Some of them are (sorry) Rhinos fans and didn't know she loved the game.

the next time sammut runs rings around the Giants I will content myself with observing the style of his eyebrows.

Did you not know? Eyebrows are SO yesterday.

Its beards now.

(Jaywilley.com redirects to the Kroma site, btw).

With the pledge the perilous situation brought a massive response from the fans - at the moment things (appear at least) to be more normal - so with I think apathy would reduce your anticipated take up.

A problem would arise if that level of investment could be raised from the fans as it would probably be more than both OK - and potentially Jay - would have put in - so if they got voting shares it would be fans take over time which I don't think is what OK has in mind - if they got a nice piece of otherwise valuleless paper (non-voting shares) to frame for their cash then it's "pledge the sequel."

Shes' got plenty of gold and siver hidden under her matress if shes' ever skint. Trouble is she has one off them fold up beds in her carravan that goes up right into the wall. When she drops it down for a bit of Bernie action the bling goes everywhere .

Sounds like theres something going down in the boardroom....

Ross Heppenstall @rosshtanda
Just spoken to @Kroma_uk and she is reviewing her options over her proposed investment in the Bulls and is seeking legal advice.

Ross Heppenstall @rosshtanda
Jay is not making any official comment but said she was "devastated" at how things have panned out for her at the club.

Ross Heppenstall @rosshtanda
Also spoken to Gerry Sutcliffe. He tells me the door is still open for Jay in invest in the Bulls.

KROMA MakeUp EU @Kroma_uk
Good Luck today Lads!! I won't be there as I haven't been invited! Wonder why.....?!!! #thethruthisgoingtocomeout xxx #COYB xxx

KROMA MakeUp EU @Kroma_uk
@KatyCummins Things are not good I'm devastated I love that Club. #theirloss xxx

TBH it all sounded a bit too good to be true when it was announced. Hope we weren't relying on that cash though.

To be honest, with her being so incredibly unprofessional about this, if we can survive without her money, I'm pleased that she's gone.

[urlhttp://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/10412677.Willey_withdraws_her_involvement_with_Bradford_Bulls/[/url

It'd be interesting to know what was behind all this.

Are irrevocable differences the same as irreconcilable differences, or is it a new type of difference?

Apparently there is now a difference where if each party agrees, it can be revoked and the difference(s) expunged from the record. Alas these differences weren't like that.

I'm going to really miss her arguing with abusive people on the T and A message board.

And so it begins

The T&A should have run a headline like "Willey leaves a mess after withdrawal".

Fnar, fnar....

Is it a coincidence that this story broke on day our management were in London and unable to respond promptly? Doubt it somehow

We certainly don't need negativity behind the scenes at the moment & we'd need a really good reason to turn down investment.

Whats more of a concern to me is the fact she seemed to have a good relationship with the players & the wheels have fallen off on the field recently too.

What she's said on twitter may be unprofessional but indicates that she was driven away and is looking at taking legal advice . She's also indicated its in the publics best interest to know whats happened.

I hope we have a full press release soon because at the moment it's painting the club in a negative light again.

You can respond from anywhere now in todays age.

Wouldn't argue with that for younger generation who are more upto speed with twitter/Facebook etc like miss Willey is, but khan and sutcliffe are a generation behind so maybe not as au-fait?

I would doubt a mp and former government minister is familiar with the modern electric telephone.